McKinley v. NP, Inc.
Plaintiff: Ryan McKinley
Defendant: NP, Inc. and Resource Marketing Corp., LLC
Case Number: 9:2020cv80485
Filed: March 24, 2020
Court: US District Court for the Southern District of Florida
Presiding Judge: Rodney Smith
Nature of Suit: Other Statutory Actions
Cause of Action: 28 U.S.C. ยง 1331
Jury Demanded By: Plaintiff
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on May 13, 2020. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
May 13, 2020 Filing 9 NOTICE of Attorney Appearance by Heather Lena Ries on behalf of NP, Inc.. Attorney Heather Lena Ries added to party NP, Inc.(pty:dft). (Ries, Heather)
May 13, 2020 Filing 8 Summons Issued as to Resource Marketing Corp., LLC. (pes)
May 12, 2020 Filing 7 NOTICE of Filing Proposed Summons(es) by Ryan McKinley re #6 Amended Complaint filed by Ryan McKinley (Attachments: #1 Summon(s) RESOURCE MARKETING CORP., LLC) (Lehrman, Seth)
May 12, 2020 Filing 6 First AMENDED COMPLAINT against NP, Inc., Resource Marketing Corp., LLC, filed by Ryan McKinley.(Lehrman, Seth)
April 27, 2020 Opinion or Order Filing 5 ORDER REQUIRING JOINT SCHEDULING REPORT, CERTIFICATES OF INTERESTED PARTIES AND CORPORATE DISCLOSURE STATEMENT (Joint Scheduling Report due by 5/26/2020) Signed by Judge Rodney Smith on 4/27/2020. See attached document for full details. (jao)
April 8, 2020 Filing 4 WAIVER OF SERVICE Returned Executed by Ryan McKinley. NP, Inc. waiver sent on 4/3/2020, answer due 6/2/2020. (Lehrman, Seth)
March 24, 2020 Filing 3 Summons Issued as to NP, Inc. (jbs)
March 24, 2020 Filing 2 Clerks Notice of Judge Assignment to Judge Rodney Smith. Pursuant to 28 USC 636(c), the parties are hereby notified that the U.S. Magistrate Judge William Matthewman is available to handle any or all proceedings in this case. If agreed, parties should complete and file the Consent form found on our website. It is not necessary to file a document indicating lack of consent. Pro se (NON-PRISONER) litigants may receive Notices of Electronic Filings (NEFS) via email after filing a Consent by Pro Se Litigant (NON-PRISONER) to Receive Notices of Electronic Filing. The consent form is available under the forms section of our website. (jbs)
March 24, 2020 Filing 1 COMPLAINT against NP, Inc.. Filing fees $ 400.00 receipt number AFLSDC-12647144, filed by Ryan McKinley. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Summon(s))(Lehrman, Seth)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Florida Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: McKinley v. NP, Inc.
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Ryan McKinley
Represented By: Joshua Harris Eggnatz
Represented By: Michael James Pascucci
Represented By: Seth Michael Lehrman
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: NP, Inc.
Represented By: Heather Lena Ries
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Resource Marketing Corp., LLC
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?