Alexander et al v. Stecker et al
| Kent Oelkers, Zach Alexander, Advantek Industrial Wood Pellets, LLC, Chris Jeffries, Luke Alexander and Kent Oelker |
| Nationwide Commercial Relief, Inc. and Mitch Stecker |
| 9:2020cv81042 |
| July 3, 2020 |
| US District Court for the Southern District of Florida |
| Rodney Smith |
| Contract: Other |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on July 20, 2020. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 11
ORDER Dismissing and Closing Case. Signed by Judge Rodney Smith on 7/20/2020. See attached document for full details. (kpe)
|
| Filing 10 Second AMENDED COMPLAINT against Nationwide Commercial Relief, Inc., Mitch Stecker filed in response to Order Granting Motion for Leave, filed by Kent Oelker, Luke Alexander, Chris Jeffires, Zach Alexander, Advantek Industrial Wood Pellets, LLC. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit Contract)(Stewart, Michael) |
|
Filing 9
ORDER to File Second Amended Complaint, ( Amended Complaint due by 7/20/2020.) Signed by Judge Rodney Smith on 7/15/2020. See attached document for full details. (kpe)
|
| Filing 8 AMENDED COMPLAINT against Nationwide Commercial Relief, Inc., Mitch Stecker filed in response to Order Granting Motion for Leave, filed by Kent Oelker, Luke Alexander, Chris Jeffires, Zach Alexander, Advantek Industrial Wood Pellets, LLC. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit Contract)(Stewart, Michael) |
|
Filing 7
ORDER to File An Amended Complaint, ( Amended Complaint due by 7/14/2020.) Signed by Judge Rodney Smith on 7/7/2020. See attached document for full details. (kpe)
|
| Filing 6 NOTICE of Filing Civil Cover Sheet by Advantek Industrial Wood Pellets, LLC, Luke Alexander, Zach Alexander, Chris Jeffires, Kent Oelker (Stewart, Michael) Modified text on 7/6/2020 (kpe). |
| Filing 5 Clerks Notice to Filer re: Summons(es) cannot be issued. Summons NOT issued for the following reason - Summons is blank. (kpe) |
| Filing 4 Clerks Notice to Filer re: Electronic Case. No Civil Cover Sheet. Filer is instructed to file a Notice (Other) with the Civil Cover Sheet attached within 24 hours of the notice. (kpe) |
| Filing 3 Clerks Notice to Filer re: Electronic Case. Party(ies) Improperly Formatted. The Filer failed to enter the party name(s) in accordance with the CM/ECF Format for Adding Parties for Attorneys Guide. The correction was made. It is not necessary to re-file the document. (kpe) |
| Filing 2 Clerks Notice of Judge Assignment to Judge Rodney Smith. Pursuant to 28 USC 636(c), the parties are hereby notified that the U.S. Magistrate Judge William Matthewman is available to handle any or all proceedings in this case. If agreed, parties should complete and file the Consent form found on our website. It is not necessary to file a document indicating lack of consent. Pro se (NON-PRISONER) litigants may receive Notices of Electronic Filings (NEFS) via email after filing a Consent by Pro Se Litigant (NON-PRISONER) to Receive Notices of Electronic Filing. The consent form is available under the forms section of our website. (kpe) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against All Defendants. Filing fees $ 400.00 receipt number AFLSDC-13126574, filed by Kent Oelkers, Luke Alexander, Chris Jeffries, Zach Alexander, Advantek Industrial Wood Pellets, LLC. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit Contract, #2 Summons (Stewart, Michael) Modified text on 7/6/2020 (kpe). |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Florida Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
