Ham v. Inch et al
| Ottis Lee Ham |
| Francisco Acosta, Sargeant John Doe #3, SGT. Salmon, A. Johnson, Officer John Doe #4, Sargeant John Doe #2, J. Heller, Leroy Adams, Claude Maye, Captain John Doe #1, E. Adderly, Mark S. Inch, Sergeant John Doe and Sergeant Joseph Salmon |
| 9:2020cv81071 |
| July 7, 2020 |
| US District Court for the Southern District of Florida |
| Lisette M Reid |
| Rodolfo A Ruiz |
| Prisoner: Civil Rights |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on May 17, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 14
AMENDED COMPLAINT against Leroy Adams, Mark S. Inch, Joseph Salmon, John Doe filed in response to Order Granting Motion for Leave (PER ECF D.E. 13 ORDER), filed by Ottis Lee Ham. (Attachments: #1 Exhibits A-D) (daa)
|
|
Filing 13
PAPERLESS ORDER granting Plaintiff's #12 Motion to Amend the Complaint. Plaintiff's proposed Amendment attached to his motion shall become the operative complaint in this action, and will be screened in turn. Plaintiff need not refile the amended complaint. The Clerk is hereby directed to cause a copy of the proposed amended complaint to be docketed separately from the motion. Signed by Magistrate Judge Lisette M. Reid on 9/1/2020. (nn)
|
|
Filing 12
MOTION for Leave to Amend #1 Complaint, by Ottis Lee Ham. Responses due by 9/14/2020 (Attachments: #1 Amended Complaint, #2 Exhibit)(kpe)
|
|
Filing 11
ORDER granting #3 Motion for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis to the extent that the plaintiff need not prepay even a partial filing fee in this case, or to prepay costs such as for service of process. Plaintiff owes the United States a debt of $350.00 which must be paid to the Clerk of the Court as funds become available.USM Service NOT Ordered. Signed by Magistrate Judge Lisette M. Reid on 7/9/2020. See attached document for full details. (br)
|
|
Filing 10
ORDER denying #5 Motion to Appoint Counsel. Signed by Magistrate Judge Lisette M. Reid on 7/9/2020. See attached document for full details. (br)
|
|
Filing 9
ORDER OF INSTRUCTIONS TO PRO SE CIVIL RIGHTS LITIGANTS. Signed by Magistrate Judge Lisette M. Reid on 7/9/2020. See attached document for full details. (br)
|
|
Filing 8
Prisoner Consent Form and Financial Certificate by Ottis Lee Ham. (drz)
|
|
Filing 7
Declaration in Support re #5 MOTION to Appoint Counsel filed by Ottis Lee Ham. (drz)
|
|
Filing 6
MEMORANDUM of Law in Support of re #5 MOTION to Appoint Counsel by Ottis Lee Ham. (drz)
|
|
Filing 5
MOTION to Appoint Counsel by Ottis Lee Ham. Responses due by 7/21/2020 (drz)
|
|
Filing 4
NOTICE of Change of Address by Ottis Lee Ham (Address Updated in CM/ECF). (drz)
|
|
Filing 3
MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis by Ottis Lee Ham. (drz)
|
|
Filing 2
Clerks Notice of Judge Assignment to Judge Rodolfo A. Ruiz, II and Magistrate Judge Lisette M. Reid. Pursuant to Administrative Order 2019-2, this matter is referred to the Magistrate Judge for a ruling on all pre-trial, non-dispositive matters and for a Report and Recommendation on any dispositive matters. (drz)
|
|
Filing 1
Complaint pursuant to 42 USC 1983 against Francisco Acosta, Leroy Adams, E. Adderly, Captain John Doe #1, J. Heller, Mark S. Inch, A. Johnson, Claude Maye, Officer John Doe #4, SGT. Salmon, Sargeant John Doe #2, Sargeant John Doe #3. Filing fee $ 400.00. IFP Filed, filed by Ottis Lee Ham.(drz)
|
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Florida Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
