Jones v. American Security Insurance Company
| Mae Bertha Jones |
| American Security Insurance Company |
| 9:2020cv81354 |
| August 19, 2020 |
| US District Court for the Southern District of Florida |
| Rodolfo A Ruiz |
| Insurance |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1446 |
| Both |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on August 27, 2020. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 7
ORDER CONSOLIDATING CASES. The Clerk of the Court is instructed to CLOSE Case No. 20-CIV-81355-RAR for administrative purposes only. All future filings shall be made under Case No. 20-CIV-81353-RAR only. Signed by Judge Rodolfo A. Ruiz, II on 8/27/2020. See attached document for full details. (gp)
|
|
Filing 6
ORDER CONSOLIDATING CASES. The Clerk of Court is instructed to CLOSE Case No. 20-CIV-81354-RAR for administrative purposes only. All future filings shall be made under Case No. 20-CIV-81353-RAR only. Signed by Judge Rodolfo A. Ruiz, II on 8/24/2020. See attached document for full details. (gp)
|
|
Filing 5
ORDER TRANSFERRING CASE to Judge Rodolfo A. Ruiz, II for all further proceedings, accepted and signed on 08/22/2020. Judge Raag Singhal no longer assigned to case. Signed by Judge Raag Singhal on 8/21/2020. See attached document for full details. (as03)
|
| Case associated with 20-CIV-81353-RAR. (gp) |
| Civil Case Terminated. Closing Case. Per ECF No. #6 Order Consolidating Cases. (gp) |
| Filing 4 Notice of Pending, Refiled, Related or Similar Actions by American Security Insurance Company (Lazaro, Daniel) |
| Filing 3 Bar Letter re: Admissions sent to attorney Grant W. Krapf, mailing date 08/20/2020. (cco) |
| Filing 2 Clerks Notice of Judge Assignment to Judge Raag Singhal. Pursuant to 28 USC 636(c), the parties are hereby notified that the U.S. Magistrate Judge William Matthewman is available to handle any or all proceedings in this case. If agreed, parties should complete and file the Consent form found on our website. It is not necessary to file a document indicating lack of consent. (drz) |
| Filing 1 NOTICE OF REMOVAL (STATE COURT COMPLAINT - Complaint) Filing fee $ 400.00 receipt number AFLSDC-13378412, filed by American Security Insurance Company. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Exhibit Composite Exh 1, #3 Errata Exhibit 2, #4 Exhibit Exhibit 3, #5 Exhibit Exhibit 4, #6 Exhibit Exhibit 5)(Lazaro, Daniel) Modified on 8/20/2020 (drz). ( No Answer, Affirmative Defenses or Motion to Dismiss filed in State Court). |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Florida Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: Jones v. American Security Insurance Company | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff: Mae Bertha Jones | |
| Represented By: | Grant W. Krapf |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant: American Security Insurance Company | |
| Represented By: | Daniel R Lazaro |
| Represented By: | Sara Levy |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
