Hudson v. JP Morgan Chase & Co.
J Steven Hudson |
JP Morgan Chase & Co. |
9:2020cv81494 |
September 3, 2020 |
US District Court for the Southern District of Florida |
Roy K Altman |
Dave Lee Brannon |
William Matthewman |
Raag Singhal |
Labor: E.R.I.S.A. |
28 U.S.C. ยง 1441 |
None |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on October 30, 2020. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 15 ORDER ADMINISTRATIVELY CLOSING CASE re #14 Notice of Settlement. The above-styled action is administratively CLOSED without prejudice. The Clerk of Court shall CLOSE this case for administrative purposes only. Any pending motions are DENIED AS MOOT. Signed by Judge Raag Singhal on 10/30/2020. See attached document for full details. (mc) |
Filing 14 NOTICE of Settlement by JP Morgan Chase & Co. (Massing, Steffie) |
Filing 13 PAPERLESS ORDER granting in part and denying in part #12 Motion for Extension of Time to File Response to #9 Motion to Remand to State Court filed by J Steven Hudson. Responses due by 10/30/2020. Signed by Judge Raag Singhal on 10/16/2020. (AHS) |
Filing 12 Unopposed MOTION for Extension of Time to File Response/Reply/Answer as to #9 MOTION to Remand to State Court by JP Morgan Chase & Co.. (Attachments: #1 Text of Proposed Order)(Massing, Steffie) |
Filing 11 PAPERLESS ORDER granting #10 Motion for Extension of Time to File Response/Reply to #9 MOTION to Remand to State Court. Response due by 10/19/2020. Signed by Judge Raag Singhal on 10/1/2020. (eca) |
Filing 10 Unopposed MOTION for Extension of Time to File Response/Reply/Answer as to #9 MOTION to Remand to State Court and to Confer and File a Joint Scheduling Report by JP Morgan Chase & Co.. (Attachments: #1 Text of Proposed Order)(Massing, Steffie) |
Filing 9 MOTION to Remand to State Court by J Steven Hudson. (mc) |
Filing 8 Certificate of Other Affiliates/Corporate Disclosure Statement - NONE disclosed by JP Morgan Chase & Co. (Massing, Steffie) |
Filing 7 ANSWER and Affirmative Defenses to Complaint re the Notice of Removal by JP Morgan Chase & Co.. (Massing, Steffie) |
Filing 6 Order Requiring Scheduling Report and Certificates of Interested Parties. Signed by Judge Raag Singhal on 9/8/2020. See attached document for full details. (drz) |
Filing 5 ORDER PROVIDING INSTRUCTIONS TO PRO SE LITIGANT. Signed by Judge Raag Singhal on 9/8/2020. See attached document for full details. (drz) |
Filing 4 NOTICE OF COURT PRACTICEUnless otherwise specified by the Court, every motion, legal memorandum, brief, and otherwise shall: be double-spaced, in justified alignment, in 12-point font, using either Times New Roman or Arial typeface. This Notice does not supplant the requirements and provisions of Local Rule 7.1(c). The Court cautions parties against excessive use of footnotes.Multiple Plaintiffs or Defendants shall file joint motions with co-parties unless there are clear conflicts of position. If conflicts of position exist, parties shall explain the conflicts in their separate motions.Failure to comply with any of these procedures may result in the imposition of appropriate sanctions. Signed by Judge Raag Singhal on 9/4/2020. (eca) |
Filing 3 ORDER OF RECUSAL. Judge Roy K. Altman and Magistrate Judge Dave Lee Brannon recused. Case reassigned to Judge Raag Singhal and Magistrate Judge William Matthewman for all further proceedings. Signed by Judge Roy K. Altman on 9/4/2020. See attached document for full details. (bms) |
Filing 2 Clerks Notice of Judge Assignment to Judge Roy K. Altman and Magistrate Judge Dave Lee Brannon. Pursuant to 28 USC 636(c), the parties are hereby notified that the U.S. Magistrate Judge Dave Lee Brannon is available to handle any or all proceedings in this case. If agreed, parties should complete and file the Consent form found on our website. It is not necessary to file a document indicating lack of consent. Pro se (NON-PRISONER) litigants may receive Notices of Electronic Filings (NEFS) via email after filing a Consent by Pro Se Litigant (NON-PRISONER) to Receive Notices of Electronic Filing. The consent form is available under the forms section of our website. (drz) |
Filing 1 NOTICE OF REMOVAL (STATE COURT COMPLAINT - Complaint (1) for Declaratory Judgment and (2) for Permanent Injunctive Relief) Filing fee $ 400.00 receipt number AFLSDC-13463267, filed by JP Morgan Chase & Co.. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Exhibit A, state court record, #3 Exhibit B, Notice of Filing Notice of Removal to be filed in the state court action)(Massing, Steffie) Modified on 9/3/2020 (drz). (No Answer, Affirmative Defenses or Miss to Dismiss Filed in State Court) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Florida Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Search for this case: Hudson v. JP Morgan Chase & Co. | |
---|---|
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Plaintiff: J Steven Hudson | |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Defendant: JP Morgan Chase & Co. | |
Represented By: | Steffie Kathleen Massing |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.