Whited v. Sanofi Aventis U.S. LLC et al
Erania Whited |
Walgreens Boot Alliance, Inc., SANOFI US SERVICES INC, Sanofi S.A., Walgreens Co., GlaxoSmithKline LLC, Pfizer, Inc., Glaxosmithkline PLC, BOEHRINGER INGELHEIM PHARMACEUTCALS, INC., Sanofi Aventis U.S. LLC and Boehringer Ingelheim Pharmaceuticals, Inc. |
9:2020cv81694 |
September 17, 2020 |
US District Court for the Southern District of Florida |
Robin L Rosenberg |
Personal Inj. Prod. Liability |
28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 |
Plaintiff |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on October 6, 2020. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 10 MDL Tag-Along Case Receipt from Southern District of Florida. Case Number 9:20-cv-81694-RLR with documents 1-9. Re: FLSD MDL Case Number 9:20-md-02924-RLR. (mc) |
Cases associated 9:20-md-2924-RLR. (mc) |
Filing 9 SUMMONS (Affidavit) Returned Executed on #1 Complaint with a 21 day response/answer filing deadline pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 12 by Erania Whited. Walgreens Boot Alliance, Inc. served on 9/24/2020, answer due 10/15/2020; Walgreens Co. served on 9/24/2020, answer due 10/15/2020. (Pulaski, Adam) |
Filing 8 ORDER OF CONSOLIDATION AND ADMINISTRATIVE CLOSE-OUT. Signed by Judge Robin L. Rosenberg on 9/29/2020. See attached document for full details. (mc) |
Filing 7 SUMMONS (Affidavit) Returned Executed on #1 Complaint with a 21 day response/answer filing deadline pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 12 by Erania Whited. BOEHRINGER INGELHEIM PHARMACEUTCALS, INC. served on 9/23/2020, answer due 10/14/2020; GlaxoSmithKline LLC served on 9/23/2020, answer due 10/14/2020; Glaxosmithkline PLC served on 9/23/2020, answer due 10/14/2020; Pfizer, Inc. served on 9/23/2020, answer due 10/14/2020; SANOFI US SERVICES INC served on 9/23/2020, answer due 10/14/2020; Sanofi Aventis U.S. LLC served on 9/23/2020, answer due 10/14/2020; Sanofi S.A. served on 9/23/2020, answer due 10/14/2020. (Attachments: #1 Summon(s))(Pulaski, Adam) |
Filing 6 Summons Issued as to Walgreens Boot Alliance, Inc., Walgreens Co.. (dj) |
Filing 5 NOTICE of Filing Proposed Summons(es) by Erania Whited re #1 Complaint filed by Erania Whited (Attachments: #1 Summon(s)) (Pulaski, Adam) |
Filing 4 Clerks Notice to Filer re: Electronic Case. Alias Not Added. The Filer failed to add the alias information for the party(ies). The correction was made. It is not necessary to re-file this document. (pcs) |
Filing 3 Clerks Notice to Filer re: Summons(es) cannot be issued. Summons NOT issued for the following reason - Defendants need to be listed first on the Summons not Illinois Corporation Service Co. (pcs) |
Filing 2 Clerks Notice of Judge Assignment to Judge Robin L. Rosenberg. Pursuant to 28 USC 636(c), the parties are hereby notified that the U.S. Magistrate Judge Bruce E. Reinhart is available to handle any or all proceedings in this case. If agreed, parties should complete and file the Consent form found on our website. It is not necessary to file a document indicating lack of consent. Pro se (NON-PRISONER) litigants may receive Notices of Electronic Filings (NEFS) via email after filing a Consent by Pro Se Litigant (NON-PRISONER) to Receive Notices of Electronic Filing. The consent form is available under the forms section of our website. (pcs) |
Filing 1 COMPLAINT against All Defendants. Filing fees $ 400.00 receipt number AFLSDC-13541575, filed by Erania Whited. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Summon(s))(Pulaski, Adam) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Florida Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.