Klim v. Azar
Plaintiff: Ann Klim
Defendant: Alex M. Azar
Case Number: 9:2020cv81771
Filed: September 30, 2020
Court: US District Court for the Southern District of Florida
Presiding Judge: Raag Singhal
Nature of Suit: Contract: Recovery Medicare
Cause of Action: 28 U.S.C. ยง 1331
Jury Demanded By: None
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on November 16, 2020. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
November 16, 2020 Set/Reset Answer Due Deadline: Alex M. Azar response due 1/12/2021. SEE DE 6 ORDER (ail)
November 13, 2020 Opinion or Order Filing 6 PAPERLESS ORDER granting #5 Unopposed Motion for Extension of Time to Respond to Complaint. Defendant's Response/Answer due by 1/12/2021. Signed by Judge Raag Singhal on 11/13/2020. (pb00)
November 13, 2020 Filing 5 Unopposed MOTION for Extension of Time Defendant's Unopposed Motion For Extension of Time to Respond to Plaintiff's Complaint re #1 Complaint by Alex M. Azar. Attorney Mary Beth Ricke added to party Alex M. Azar(pty:dft). Responses due by 11/30/2020 (Attachments: #1 Text of Proposed Order Exhibit A)(Ricke, Mary Beth)
October 1, 2020 Filing 4 NOTICE OF COURT PRACTICEUnless otherwise specified by the Court, every motion, legal memorandum, brief, and otherwise shall: be double-spaced, in justified alignment, in 12-point font, using either Times New Roman or Arial typeface. This Notice does not supplant the requirements and provisions of Local Rule 7.1(c). The Court cautions parties against excessive use of footnotes.Multiple Plaintiffs or Defendants shall file joint motions with co-parties unless there are clear conflicts of position. If conflicts of position exist, parties shall explain the conflicts in their separate motions.Failure to comply with any of these procedures may result in the imposition of appropriate sanctions. Signed by Judge Raag Singhal on 10/1/2020. (pb00)
September 30, 2020 Filing 3 Summons Issued as to Alex M. Azar. (amb)
September 30, 2020 Filing 2 Clerks Notice of Judge Assignment to Judge Raag Singhal. Pursuant to 28 USC 636(c), the parties are hereby notified that the U.S. Magistrate Judge William Matthewman is available to handle any or all proceedings in this case. If agreed, parties should complete and file the Consent form found on our website. It is not necessary to file a document indicating lack of consent. Pro se (NON-PRISONER) litigants may receive Notices of Electronic Filings (NEFS) via email after filing a Consent by Pro Se Litigant (NON-PRISONER) to Receive Notices of Electronic Filing. The consent form is available under the forms section of our website. (amb)
September 30, 2020 Filing 1 COMPLAINT for Judicial Review against Ann Klim. Filing fees $ 400.00 receipt number AFLSDC-13610665, filed by Ann Klim. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Summon(s))(Hayden, Eric)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Florida Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Klim v. Azar
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Ann Klim
Represented By: Richard Donald Schuler
Represented By: Eric Hayden
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Alex M. Azar
Represented By: Mary Beth Ricke
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?