Klim v. Azar
Ann Klim |
Alex M. Azar |
9:2020cv81771 |
September 30, 2020 |
US District Court for the Southern District of Florida |
Raag Singhal |
Contract: Recovery Medicare |
28 U.S.C. ยง 1331 |
None |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on November 16, 2020. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Set/Reset Answer Due Deadline: Alex M. Azar response due 1/12/2021. SEE DE 6 ORDER (ail) |
Filing 6 PAPERLESS ORDER granting #5 Unopposed Motion for Extension of Time to Respond to Complaint. Defendant's Response/Answer due by 1/12/2021. Signed by Judge Raag Singhal on 11/13/2020. (pb00) |
Filing 5 Unopposed MOTION for Extension of Time Defendant's Unopposed Motion For Extension of Time to Respond to Plaintiff's Complaint re #1 Complaint by Alex M. Azar. Attorney Mary Beth Ricke added to party Alex M. Azar(pty:dft). Responses due by 11/30/2020 (Attachments: #1 Text of Proposed Order Exhibit A)(Ricke, Mary Beth) |
Filing 4 NOTICE OF COURT PRACTICEUnless otherwise specified by the Court, every motion, legal memorandum, brief, and otherwise shall: be double-spaced, in justified alignment, in 12-point font, using either Times New Roman or Arial typeface. This Notice does not supplant the requirements and provisions of Local Rule 7.1(c). The Court cautions parties against excessive use of footnotes.Multiple Plaintiffs or Defendants shall file joint motions with co-parties unless there are clear conflicts of position. If conflicts of position exist, parties shall explain the conflicts in their separate motions.Failure to comply with any of these procedures may result in the imposition of appropriate sanctions. Signed by Judge Raag Singhal on 10/1/2020. (pb00) |
Filing 3 Summons Issued as to Alex M. Azar. (amb) |
Filing 2 Clerks Notice of Judge Assignment to Judge Raag Singhal. Pursuant to 28 USC 636(c), the parties are hereby notified that the U.S. Magistrate Judge William Matthewman is available to handle any or all proceedings in this case. If agreed, parties should complete and file the Consent form found on our website. It is not necessary to file a document indicating lack of consent. Pro se (NON-PRISONER) litigants may receive Notices of Electronic Filings (NEFS) via email after filing a Consent by Pro Se Litigant (NON-PRISONER) to Receive Notices of Electronic Filing. The consent form is available under the forms section of our website. (amb) |
Filing 1 COMPLAINT for Judicial Review against Ann Klim. Filing fees $ 400.00 receipt number AFLSDC-13610665, filed by Ann Klim. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Summon(s))(Hayden, Eric) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Florida Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Search for this case: Klim v. Azar | |
---|---|
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Plaintiff: Ann Klim | |
Represented By: | Richard Donald Schuler |
Represented By: | Eric Hayden |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Defendant: Alex M. Azar | |
Represented By: | Mary Beth Ricke |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.