CORBIN v. HARD TACK, INC. et al
Plaintiff: SARAH JILL CORBIN
Defendant: DEALER RENEWAL SERVICES, ROYAL ADMINISTRATION SERVICES, INC. and HARD TACK, INC.
Case Number: 9:2020cv81887
Filed: October 9, 2020
Court: US District Court for the Southern District of Florida
Presiding Judge: Rodney Smith
Nature of Suit: Other Statutory Actions
Cause of Action: 28 U.S.C. ยง 1331
Jury Demanded By: Plaintiff
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on December 3, 2020. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
December 3, 2020 Filing 12 Plaintiff's MOTION for Extension of Time TO MOVE FOR DEFAULT FINAL JUDGMENT AGAINST DEFENDANT HARD TACK, INC., AND MOTION FOR LEAVE TO CONDUCT CLASS CERTIFICATION AND DAMAGES RELTAED DISCOVERY by SARAH JILL CORBIN. Responses due by 12/17/2020 (Attachments: #1 Text of Proposed Order)(Eggnatz, Joshua)
December 2, 2020 Filing 11 Clerks Entry of Default as to Hard Tack, Inc. - Motions Terminated: #10 Motion for Clerks Entry of Default Signed by DEPUTY CLERK on 12/2/2020. (mee)
December 2, 2020 Filing 10 Plaintiff's MOTION for Clerks Entry of Default as to HARD TACK, INC. by SARAH JILL CORBIN. (Attachments: #1 Text of Proposed Order)(Eggnatz, Joshua)
December 1, 2020 Filing 9 Defendant's ANSWER and Affirmative Defenses to Complaint by ROYAL ADMINISTRATION SERVICES, INC.. Attorney Leslie Lagomasino Baum added to party ROYAL ADMINISTRATION SERVICES, INC.(pty:dft). (Baum, Leslie)
November 2, 2020 Opinion or Order Filing 8 PAPERLESS ORDER granting #7 Motion for Extension of Time to File Response/Answer to a Complaint. ROYAL ADMINISTRATION SERVICES, INC. shall file its Answer to the Complaint by no later than 12/2/2020. Signed by Judge Rodney Smith on 11/2/2020. (ogn)
November 2, 2020 Filing 7 Unopposed MOTION for Extension of Time to File Response/Reply/Answer as to #1 Complaint, by ROYAL ADMINISTRATION SERVICES, INC.. Attorney Neil David Kodsi added to party ROYAL ADMINISTRATION SERVICES, INC.(pty:dft). (Attachments: #1 Text of Proposed Order)(Kodsi, Neil)
October 13, 2020 Opinion or Order Filing 6 Order Requiring Joint Scheduling Report, Certificates of Interested parties and Corporate Disclosure Statement. Joint Scheduling Report due by 12/14/2020 Signed by Judge Rodney Smith on 10/13/2020. See attached document for full details. (lk)
October 13, 2020 Filing 5 SUMMONS (Affidavit) Returned Executed on #1 Complaint, with a 21 day response/answer filing deadline pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 12 by SARAH JILL CORBIN. ROYAL ADMINISTRATION SERVICES, INC. served on 10/12/2020, answer due 11/2/2020. (Richards, Jordan)
October 12, 2020 Filing 4 SUMMONS (Affidavit) Returned Executed on #1 Complaint, with a 21 day response/answer filing deadline pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 12 by SARAH JILL CORBIN. HARD TACK, INC. served on 10/12/2020, answer due 11/2/2020. (Richards, Jordan)
October 9, 2020 Filing 3 Summons Issued as to DEALER RENEWAL SERVICES, HARD TACK, INC., ROYAL ADMINISTRATION SERVICES, INC.. (cds)
October 9, 2020 Filing 2 Clerks Notice of Judge Assignment to Judge Rodney Smith. Pursuant to 28 USC 636(c), the parties are hereby notified that the U.S. Magistrate Judge William Matthewman is available to handle any or all proceedings in this case. If agreed, parties should complete and file the Consent form found on our website. It is not necessary to file a document indicating lack of consent. Pro se (NON-PRISONER) litigants may receive Notices of Electronic Filings (NEFS) via email after filing a Consent by Pro Se Litigant (NON-PRISONER) to Receive Notices of Electronic Filing. The consent form is available under the forms section of our website. (cds)
October 9, 2020 Filing 1 COMPLAINT CLASS ACTION COMPLAINT FOR DAMAGES AND DEMAND FOR JURY TRIAL against DEALER RENEWAL SERVICES, HARD TACK, INC., ROYAL ADMINISTRATION SERVICES, INC.. Filing fees $ 400.00 receipt number AFLSDC-13667227, filed by SARAH JILL CORBIN. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Summon(s) as to Hard Tack, Inc., #3 Summon(s) as to Dealer Renewal Services, #4 Summon(s) as to Royal Administration Services, Inc.)(Richards, Jordan)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Florida Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: CORBIN v. HARD TACK, INC. et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: DEALER RENEWAL SERVICES
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: ROYAL ADMINISTRATION SERVICES, INC.
Represented By: Neil David Kodsi
Represented By: Leslie Lagomasino Baum
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: HARD TACK, INC.
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: SARAH JILL CORBIN
Represented By: Joshua Harris Eggnatz
Represented By: Jordan Lee Richards
Represented By: Michael James Pascucci
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?