Datrec, LLC v. Progeny Genetics, LLC
| DATREC, LLC |
| PROGENY GENETICS, LLC |
| 9:2020cv81913 |
| October 14, 2020 |
| US District Court for the Southern District of Florida |
| Roy K Altman |
| Dave Lee Brannon |
| Patent |
| 15 U.S.C. ยง 1126 |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on November 19, 2020. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 16 FORM AO 120 SENT TO DIRECTOR OF U.S. PATENT AND TRADEMARK (Attachments: #1 Order Administratively Closing Case) (jas) |
Filing 15
ORDER Administratively Closing Case. Signed by Judge Roy K. Altman on 11/18/2020. See attached document for full details. (jas)
|
| Filing 14 Joint MOTION for Extension of Time to File Response/Reply/Answer by Progeny Genetics, LLC. (Attachments: #1 Text of Proposed Order Order Granting Joint Motion for Extension of Time to File Responsive Pleading)(French, Digna) |
|
Filing 13
PAPERLESS ORDER granting in part and denying in part #10 Unopposed Motion for Extension of Time. The Defendant may file a response by November 19, 2020. Signed by Judge Roy K. Altman on 11/2/2020. (drd)
|
| Filing 12 Corporate Disclosure Statement by Progeny Genetics, LLC identifying Corporate Parent Ambry Genetics Corporation for Progeny Genetics, LLC (French, Digna) |
| Filing 11 NOTICE of Attorney Appearance by Digna B. French on behalf of Progeny Genetics, LLC (French, Digna) |
| Filing 10 Unopposed MOTION for Extension of Time to File Responsive Pleading by Progeny Genetics, LLC. Attorney Digna B. French added to party Progeny Genetics, LLC(pty:dft). Responses due by 11/16/2020 (Attachments: #1 Text of Proposed Order Order Granting Defendant Progeny Genetics LLC's Unopposed Motion for Extension of Time to File Responsive Pleading)(French, Digna) |
| Filing 9 PAPERLESS ORDER granting #8 Motion to Appear Pro Hac Vice, Consent to Designation, and Request to Electronically Receive Notices of Electronic Filing for Attorney William P. Ramey, III. Signed by U.S Magistrate Judge Dave Lee Brannon on 10/19/2020. (jb02) |
| Filing 8 Corrected MOTION to Appear Pro Hac Vice, Consent to Designation, and Request to Electronically Receive Notices of Electronic Filing for WILLIAM P. RAMEY, III. Filing Fee $ 200.00 Amended/Corrected Motion to Appear Pro Hac Vice Filed - Filing Fees Previously Paid. See #6 Motion to Appear Pro Hac Vice, by Datrec, LLC. Responses due by 11/2/2020 (Attachments: #1 Certification CERTIFICATION OF WILLIAM P. RAMEY, III, #2 Text of Proposed Order Proposed Order, #3 Certification Certificate of Service)(Brieant, Victoria) |
| Filing 7 PAPERLESS ORDER denying without prejudice #6 Plaintiff's Motion to Appear Pro Hac Vice, Consent to Designation, and Request to Electronically Receive Notices of Electronic Filing for Attorney William P. Ramey, III. This Motion is denied as it does not include any information in the first paragraph for purposes of appearance as co-counsel on behalf of party being represented. Signed by U.S. Magistrate Judge Dave Lee Brannon on 10/16/2020. (jb02) |
| Filing 6 First MOTION to Appear Pro Hac Vice, Consent to Designation, and Request to Electronically Receive Notices of Electronic Filing for Order William P. Ramey, III,. Pay.gov Agency Tracking ID FLSDC-13700020. Filing Fee $ 200.00 by DATREC, LLC. Responses due by 10/29/2020 (Attachments: #1 Certification CERTIFICATION OF WILLIAM P. RAMEY, III, #2 Proposed Order, #3 Certificate of Service)(Brieant, Victoria) |
| Filing 5 Bar Letter re: Admissions sent to attorney William P. Ramey, III, mailing date 10/15/2020. (cco) |
| Filing 4 Summons Issued as to PROGENY GENETICS, LLC. (ebz) |
| Filing 3 FORM AO 120 SENT TO DIRECTOR OF U.S. PATENT AND TRADEMARK (Attachments: #1 Complaint) (ebz) |
| Filing 2 Clerks Notice of Judge Assignment to Judge Roy K. Altman and Magistrate Judge Dave Lee Brannon. Pursuant to 28 USC 636(c), the parties are hereby notified that the U.S. Magistrate Judge Dave Lee Brannon is available to handle any or all proceedings in this case. If agreed, parties should complete and file the Consent form found on our website. It is not necessary to file a document indicating lack of consent. (ebz) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT FOR PATENT INFRINGEMENT against PROGENY GENETICS, LLC. Filing fees $ 400.00 receipt number BFLSDC-13693924, filed by DATREC, LLC. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A to the Complaint, Patent at Issue, #2 Civil Cover Sheet Civil Cover Sheet, #3 Summon(s) Summons)(Brieant, Victoria) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Florida Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: Datrec, LLC v. Progeny Genetics, LLC | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant: PROGENY GENETICS, LLC | |
| Represented By: | Digna B. French |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff: DATREC, LLC | |
| Represented By: | Victoria Elisabeth Brieant |
| Represented By: | William P. Ramey, III |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
