Cohan v. Charcoal Pit, Inc.
| Howard Cohan |
| Charcoal Pit, Inc. a Florida Profit Corporation doing business as Brickyard Micro Brewery |
| 9:2020cv81983 |
| October 28, 2020 |
| US District Court for the Southern District of Florida |
| Dave Lee Brannon |
| Donald M Middlebrooks |
| Civil Rights: Americans with Disabilities - Other |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 12182 |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on December 22, 2020. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 11
ORDER CLOSING CASE Signed by Judge Donald M. Middlebrooks on 12/22/2020. See attached document for full details. (ail)
|
| Filing 10 JOINT STIPULATION of Dismissal With Prejudice by Howard Cohan (Sconzo, Gregory) Modified text on 12/18/2020 (ebz). |
|
Filing 9
PAPERLESS ORDER REQUIRING FILING OF CLOSING DOCUMENTS. On December 7, 2020, the Parties filed a Notice of Settlement. (DE #8 ). The Court congratulates the Parties on reaching an amicable resolution of this case. The Parties shall file appropriate closing documents within 10 days of the Notice, or by December 17, 2020. The Court will retain jurisdiction to enforce the terms of the Parties' settlement agreement if requested to do so before closing the case. The Parties are advised that the Notice of Settlement does not stay this litigation, and therefore until closing documents are filed, the Court will expect compliance with all pretrial deadlines. (Miscellaneous Deadline 12/17/2020.) Signed by Judge Donald M. Middlebrooks on 12/9/2020. (kal)
|
| Filing 8 NOTICE of Settlement by Howard Cohan (Sconzo, Gregory) |
|
Filing 7
PAPERLESS ORDER granting #6 Defendant's Unopposed Motion for Extension of Time to File Response to Complaint. Defendant seeks a 14-day extension of the deadline to respond to Plaintiff's complaint from November 23, 2020 to December 7, 2020. Defendant's counsel represents that he was "just retained" and therefore requires additional time "to investigate this matter" and "to prepare a cogent response to the Complaint." (DE #6 para. 2, 4). Motions for extension of time may not be premised upon conclusory assertions or vague generalities; rather, they must set forth good cause supported by specific facts. Although Defendant's Motion fails to set forth specific facts by which the Court may evaluate whether good cause exists, I will grant the motion because the extension is relatively brief and it is unopposed. Accordingly, the deadline for Defendant to respond to the Complaint is extended to December 7, 2020. Future requests for extensions will be denied unless the moving party can establish that a particular deadline could not be met despite diligent efforts supported by particular facts. The Parties are further advised that no deadlines set forth in the ADA Title III Scheduling Order (DE #4 ) are modified as a result of this Order. Signed by Judge Donald M. Middlebrooks on 11/24/2020. (kal)
|
| Filing 6 Unopposed MOTION for Extension of Time to Respond to Complaint Two Week Extension re #1 Complaint by Charcoal Pit, Inc.. Attorney Michael Anthony Pancier added to party Charcoal Pit, Inc.(pty:dft). Responses due by 12/7/2020 (Pancier, Michael) |
| Filing 5 Statement of: Responding to the Court's Interrogatories by Howard Cohan (Attachments: #1 Exhibit Photographs, #2 Exhibit Pacer Search, #3 Exhibit Prior Complaint, Dismissal Documents)(Sconzo, Gregory) |
|
Filing 4
ADA TITLE III SCHEDULING ORDER (Status Report due by 1/28/2021) Signed by Judge Donald M. Middlebrooks on 10/29/2020. See attached document for full details. (ebz)
|
| Filing 3 Summons Issued as to Charcoal Pit, Inc.. (ebz) |
| Filing 2 Clerks Notice of Judge Assignment to Judge Donald M. Middlebrooks and Magistrate Judge Dave Lee Brannon. Pursuant to 28 USC 636(c), the parties are hereby notified that the U.S. Magistrate Judge Dave Lee Brannon is available to handle any or all proceedings in this case. If agreed, parties should complete and file the Consent form found on our website. It is not necessary to file a document indicating lack of consent. Pro se (NON-PRISONER) litigants may receive Notices of Electronic Filings (NEFS) via email after filing a Consent by Pro Se Litigant (NON-PRISONER) to Receive Notices of Electronic Filing. The consent form is available under the forms section of our website. (ebz) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against Charcoal Pit, Inc.. Filing fees $ 400.00 receipt number AFLSDC-13774799, filed by Howard Cohan. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Summon(s), #3 Exhibit Settlement Agreement)(Sconzo, Gregory) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Florida Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: Cohan v. Charcoal Pit, Inc. | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff: Howard Cohan | |
| Represented By: | Gregory Steven Sconzo |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant: Charcoal Pit, Inc. a Florida Profit Corporation doing business as Brickyard Micro Brewery | |
| Represented By: | Michael Anthony Pancier |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
