Aspen Licensing International, Inc. v. Brown Shoe Company, Inc.
| Aspen Licensing International, Inc. |
| Caleres Inc and Brown Shoe Company, Inc. a New York Corporation doing business as Caleres, Inc. |
| 9:2020cv82094 |
| November 13, 2020 |
| US District Court for the Southern District of Florida |
| Rodney Smith |
| Trademark |
| 15 U.S.C. ยง 1125 |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on January 5, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 15 NOTICE by Aspen Licensing International, Inc. re #14 Order Requiring Joint Scheduling Report, Certificate of Service (DuBosar, Howard) |
Filing 14
ORDER REQUIRING JOINT SCHEDULING REPORT, CERTIFICATES OF INTERESTED PARTIES AND CORPORATE DISCLOSURE STATEMENTS. Joint Scheduling Report due by 2/3/2021 Signed by Judge Rodney Smith on 1/4/2021. See attached document for full details. (drz)
|
|
Filing 13
PAPERLESS ORDER GRANTING #10 Defendant's Unopposed Motion for Extension of Time to Respond to Complaint #1 . Defendant shall file its Response to Complaint #1 no later than January 21, 2021. Signed by Judge Rodney Smith on 12/29/2020. (zgs)
|
| Filing 12 NOTICE of Change of Address, Email or Law Firm Name by Howard D. DuBosar (DuBosar, Howard) |
| Filing 11 NOTICE of Change of Address, Email or Law Firm Name by Harrison Ross DuBosar (DuBosar, Harrison) |
| Filing 10 Unopposed MOTION for Extension of Time to File Response/Reply/Answer as to #1 Complaint by Brown Shoe Company, Inc.. Attorney Jaime Rich Vining added to party Brown Shoe Company, Inc.(pty:dft). (Attachments: #1 Text of Proposed Order)(Vining, Jaime) |
| Filing 9 Summons Issued as to Brown Shoe Company, Inc.. (jua) |
| Filing 8 Clerks Notice to Filer re #7 Notice of Filing Proposed Summons(es),. Document not attached ; CORRECTIVE ACTION REQUIRED - Filer must file a Notice of Striking, then re-file the document with summons attached. (drz) |
| Filing 7 NOTICE of Filing Proposed Summons(es) by Aspen Licensing International, Inc. re 5 Clerks Notice to Filer re: Electronic Case, Summons(es), #1 Complaint filed by Aspen Licensing International, Inc. (Attachments: #1 Summon(s)) (DuBosar, Howard) |
| Filing 6 FORM AO 120 SENT TO DIRECTOR OF U.S. PATENT AND TRADEMARK (Attachments: #1 Complaint) (drz) |
| Filing 5 Clerks Notice to Filer re: Summons(es) cannot be issued. The party(ies) on the summons(es) does not match the initiating documents (drz) |
| Filing 4 Clerks Notice to Filer re: Electronic Case. Party(ies) Improperly Formatted. The Filer failed to enter the party name(s) in accordance with the CM/ECF Format for Adding Parties for Attorneys Guide. The correction was made. It is not necessary to re-file the document. (drz) |
| Filing 3 FORM AO 120 SENT TO DIRECTOR OF U.S. PATENT AND TRADEMARK. (drz) |
| Filing 2 Clerks Notice of Judge Assignment to Judge Rodney Smith. Pursuant to 28 USC 636(c), the parties are hereby notified that the U.S. Magistrate Judge William Matthewman is available to handle any or all proceedings in this case. If agreed, parties should complete and file the Consent form found on our website. It is not necessary to file a document indicating lack of consent. (drz) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against Caleres Inc. Filing fees $ 400.00 receipt number AFLSDC-13864931, filed by Aspen Licensing International, Inc.. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Summon(s))(DuBosar, Howard) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Florida Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
