Cohan v. James King, Inc.
Plaintiff: Howard Cohan
Defendant: James King, Inc. a Florida Profit Corporation doing business as Ichiyami Buffet & Sushi
Case Number: 9:2020cv82131
Filed: November 20, 2020
Court: US District Court for the Southern District of Florida
Presiding Judge: Dave Lee Brannon
Referring Judge: Donald M Middlebrooks
Nature of Suit: Civil Rights: Americans with Disabilities - Other
Cause of Action: 42 U.S.C. ยง 12182
Jury Demanded By: None
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on December 22, 2020. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
December 22, 2020 Filing 7 ANSWER and Affirmative Defenses to Complaint by James King, Inc.. (Schwartz, Wayne)
December 7, 2020 Filing 6 NOTICE of Attorney Appearance by Wayne Howard Schwartz on behalf of James King, Inc.. Attorney Wayne Howard Schwartz added to party James King, Inc.(pty:dft). (Schwartz, Wayne)
December 7, 2020 Filing 5 Statement of: Responding to the Court's Interrogatories by Howard Cohan (Attachments: #1 Exhibit Photographs, #2 Exhibit Pacer Search)(Sconzo, Gregory)
November 23, 2020 Opinion or Order Filing 4 ADA TITLE III SCHEDULING ORDER. SCHEDULING ORDER: Mediation Deadline 2/26/2021. Status Report due by 2/19/2021. Until the Parties file the Case Management Report, all discovery in this case is STAYED, except as provided herein. Signed by Judge Donald M. Middlebrooks on 11/23/2020. See attached document for full details. (amb) #Pattern Jury Instruction Builder - To access the latest, up to date changes to the 11th Circuit Pattern Jury Instructions go to https://pji.ca11.uscourts.gov or click here.
November 23, 2020 Set/Reset Deadlines/Hearings ( Mediation Deadline 2/12/2021.), Deadline(s)/Hearing(s) terminated re DE #4 Order. (amb)
November 20, 2020 Filing 3 Summons Issued as to James King, Inc.. (amb)
November 20, 2020 Filing 2 Clerks Notice of Judge Assignment to Judge Donald M. Middlebrooks and Magistrate Judge Dave Lee Brannon. Pursuant to 28 USC 636(c), the parties are hereby notified that the U.S. Magistrate Judge Dave Lee Brannon is available to handle any or all proceedings in this case. If agreed, parties should complete and file the Consent form found on our website. It is not necessary to file a document indicating lack of consent. Pro se (NON-PRISONER) litigants may receive Notices of Electronic Filings (NEFS) via email after filing a Consent by Pro Se Litigant (NON-PRISONER) to Receive Notices of Electronic Filing. The consent form is available under the forms section of our website. (amb)
November 20, 2020 Filing 1 COMPLAINT against James King, Inc.. Filing fees $ 400.00 receipt number AFLSDC-13902436, filed by Howard Cohan. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Summon(s))(Sconzo, Gregory)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Florida Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Cohan v. James King, Inc.
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Howard Cohan
Represented By: Gregory Steven Sconzo
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: James King, Inc. a Florida Profit Corporation doing business as Ichiyami Buffet & Sushi
Represented By: Wayne Howard Schwartz
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?