HIGHTOWER v. Pfizer Inc. et al
JOHN DANIEL HIGHTOWER |
McKesson Corporation, Hi-Tech Pharmacal Co., Inc., Apotex Inc., Novitium Pharma, LLC, GlaxoSmithKline LLC, Sanofi US Services Inc., Boehringer Ingelheim USA Corporation, Ajanta Pharma USA Inc., Amneal Pharmaceuticals LLC, Ani Pharmaceuticals Inc., Teva Pharmaceuticals U.S.A., Inc., Perrigo Company, Pfizer Inc., GlaxoSmithKline (America) Inc., Boehringer Ingelheim Corporation, Boehringer Ingelheim Pharmaceuticals, Inc., Amneal Pharmaceuticals of New York, LLC, L. Perrigo Co., Dr. Reddy's Laboratories Inc., Sun Pharmaceutical Industries, Inc. f/k/a Ranbaxy Pharmaceuticals Inc., Geri-Care Pharmaceuticals Corp., Par Pharmaceutical, Inc., Strides Pharma, Inc., Perrigo Research & Development Company, Apotex Corporation, Glenmark Pharmaceuticals, Inc., USA, Aurobindo Pharma USA, Inc., Sandoz Inc., Denton Pharma Inc. d/b/a Northwind Pharmaceuticals, Sanofi Aventis U.S. LLC and Denton Pharma doing business as Northwind Pharmaceuticals |
9:2020cv82214 |
December 2, 2020 |
US District Court for the Southern District of Florida |
Bruce E Reinhart |
Robin L Rosenberg |
Personal Injury: Health Care/Pharmaceutical Personal Injury Product Liability |
28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 |
Plaintiff |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on December 31, 2020. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 11 ORDER OF CONSOLIDATION AND ADMINISTRATIVE CLOSE-OUT. Closing Case. Signed by Judge Robin L. Rosenberg on 12/30/2020. See attached document for full details. (pes) |
Filing 10 SUMMONS (Affidavit) Returned Executed on #1 Complaint with a 21 day response/answer filing deadline pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 12 by JOHN DANIEL HIGHTOWER. Hi-Tech Pharmacal Co., Inc. served on 12/21/2020, answer due 1/11/2021. (Antunovich, Tomislav) |
Filing 9 SUMMONS (Affidavit) Returned Executed on #1 Complaint with a 21 day response/answer filing deadline pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 12 by JOHN DANIEL HIGHTOWER. Ani Pharmaceuticals Inc. served on 12/16/2020, answer due 1/6/2021. (Antunovich, Tomislav) |
Filing 8 MDL Tag-Along Case Receipt from Southern District of Florida. Case Number 9:20-cv-82214-RLR with documents 1-7. Re: FLSD MDL Case Number 9:20-md-02924-RLR. (mc) |
Filing 7 Summons Issued as to Hi-Tech Pharmacal Co., Inc. (drz) |
Filing 6 Summons Issued as to Ani Pharmaceuticals Inc. (drz) |
Cases associated 9:20-md-2924-RLR. (mc) |
Filing 5 NOTICE of Filing Proposed Summons(es) re Hi-Tech Pharmacal Co., Inc. (DE, NY) by JOHN DANIEL HIGHTOWER (Antunovich, Tomislav) |
Filing 4 NOTICE of Filing Proposed Summons(es) re Ani Pharmaceuticals Inc. (DE, MN) by JOHN DANIEL HIGHTOWER (Antunovich, Tomislav) |
Filing 3 Clerks Notice to Filer re: Summons(es) cannot be issued. Summons NOT issued for the following reason - All Parties were listed on one Summons. Each party requires an individual Summons. (drz) |
Filing 2 Clerks Notice of Judge Assignment to Judge Robin L. Rosenberg and Magistrate Judge Bruce E. Reinhart. Pursuant to 28 USC 636(c), the parties are hereby notified that the U.S. Magistrate Judge Bruce E. Reinhart is available to handle any or all proceedings in this case. If agreed, parties should complete and file the Consent form found on our website. It is not necessary to file a document indicating lack of consent. (drz) |
Filing 1 COMPLAINT against All Defendants. Filing fees $ 402.00 receipt number AFLSDC-13967234, filed by JOHN DANIEL HIGHTOWER. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Summon(s))(Antunovich, Tomislav) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Florida Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.