United States v. Solomon
United States |
Evelyn Solomon |
9:2020cv82236 |
December 9, 2020 |
US District Court for the Southern District of Florida |
Aileen M Cannon |
Other Statutory Actions |
28 U.S.C. ยง 1331 |
Defendant |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on February 1, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 11 MOTION for Partial Summary Judgment by Evelyn Solomon. Responses due by 2/16/2021 (DiRuzzo, Joseph) |
Filing 10 Statement of: matieral facts by Evelyn Solomon (Attachments: #1 Exhibit 1st SOL extension, #2 Exhibit 2nd SOL extension)(DiRuzzo, Joseph) |
Filing 9 ANSWER and Affirmative Defenses to Complaint with Jury Demand by Evelyn Solomon. (DiRuzzo, Joseph) |
Filing 8 ORDER REQUIRING JOINT SCHEDULING REPORT AND CERTIFICATES OF INTERESTED PARTIES. Joint Scheduling Report and Certificates of Interested Parties due by 2/12/2021. Signed by Judge Aileen M. Cannon on 1/10/2021. See attached document for full details. (scn) |
Filing 7 NOTICE of Attorney Appearance by Daniel Lader on behalf of Evelyn Solomon. Attorney Daniel Lader added to party Evelyn Solomon(pty:dft). (Lader, Daniel) |
Filing 6 WAIVER OF SERVICE Returned Executed by Evelyn Solomon. Evelyn Solomon waiver sent on 12/9/2020, answer due 2/8/2021. (DiRuzzo, Joseph) |
Filing 5 NOTICE of Attorney Appearance by Joseph Andrew DiRuzzo, III on behalf of Evelyn Solomon. Attorney Joseph Andrew DiRuzzo, III added to party Evelyn Solomon(pty:dft). (DiRuzzo, Joseph) |
Filing 4 Notice of Pending, Refiled, Related or Similar Actions by United States (Nasta, John) |
Filing 3 Summons Issued as to Evelyn Solomon. (scn) |
Filing 2 Clerks Notice of Judge Assignment to Judge Aileen M. Cannon. Pursuant to 28 USC 636(c), the parties are hereby notified that the U.S. Magistrate Judge Dave Lee Brannon is available to handle any or all proceedings in this case. If agreed, parties should complete and file the Consent form found on our website. It is not necessary to file a document indicating lack of consent. Pro se (NON-PRISONER) litigants may receive Notices of Electronic Filings (NEFS) via email after filing a Consent by Pro Se Litigant (NON-PRISONER) to Receive Notices of Electronic Filing. The consent form is available under the forms section of our website. (scn) |
Filing 1 COMPLAINT against Evelyn Solomon. Filing fees $ 402.00. USA Filer - No Filing Fee Required, filed by United States. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Summon(s) Summons for Evelyn Solomon)(Nasta, John) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Florida Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Search for this case: United States v. Solomon | |
---|---|
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Defendant: Evelyn Solomon | |
Represented By: | Daniel Lader |
Represented By: | Joseph Andrew DiRuzzo, III |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Plaintiff: United States | |
Represented By: | John P. Nasta |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.