Johnson v. Castillo et al
Plaintiff: Lee Mitchell Johnson
Defendant: Lt. Castillo and Cert. Deputy Michaels
Case Number: 9:2021cv80517
Filed: March 8, 2021
Court: US District Court for the Southern District of Florida
Presiding Judge: Beth Bloom
Nature of Suit: Prisoner: Civil Rights
Cause of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Jury Demanded By: Defendant
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on July 26, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
April 27, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 25 ORDER REFERRING CASE to Volunteer Attorney Program. Signed by Judge Beth Bloom on 4/27/2021. See attached document for full details. (mee)
April 27, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 24 ORDER ON MOTION FOR ASSISTANCE OF COUNSEL,denying #23 Motion to Appoint Counsel. Signed by Judge Beth Bloom on 4/27/2021. See attached document for full details. (mee)
April 26, 2021 Filing 23 MOTION for Assistance of Counsel by Lee Mitchell Johnson. Responses due by 5/10/2021 (Attachments: #1 Exhibit)(mee)
April 22, 2021 Filing 22 AMENDED COMPLAINT against Castillo, Michaels, filed by Lee Mitchell Johnson.(mee)
April 22, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 21 ORDER REQUIRING SCHEDULING REPORT AND CERTIFICATES OF INTERESTED PARTIES. Joint Scheduling Report due by 5/13/2021. Signed by Judge Beth Bloom on 4/22/2021. See attached document for full details. (cds)
April 22, 2021 Filing 20 ANSWER and Affirmative Defenses to Complaint with Jury Demand by Michaels. (Barranco, Summer)
April 22, 2021 Filing 19 NOTICE of Attorney Appearance by Summer Marie Barranco on behalf of Michaels. Attorney Summer Marie Barranco added to party Michaels(pty:dft). (Barranco, Summer)
April 8, 2021 Filing 18 ANSWER and Affirmative Defenses to Complaint with Jury Demand by Castillo. (Barranco, Summer)
April 8, 2021 Filing 17 NOTICE of Attorney Appearance by Summer Marie Barranco on behalf of Castillo. Attorney Summer Marie Barranco added to party Castillo(pty:dft). (Barranco, Summer)
April 7, 2021 Filing 16 SUMMONS (Affidavit) Returned Executed on #1 Complaint 42 USC 1983 or Bivens with a 21 day response/answer filing deadline pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 12 Michaels served on 4/1/2021, answer due 4/22/2021. (pes)
April 6, 2021 Filing 15 CLERK'S NOTICE of Compliance by Modifying Docket Text/Terminating Motions 14 SEALED MOTION, 13 SEALED MOTION, pursuant to Chambers. (nc)
April 6, 2021 SYSTEM ENTRY - Docket Entry 14 [motion] restricted/sealed until further notice. (amb)
April 6, 2021 SYSTEM ENTRY - Docket Entry 13 [motion] restricted/sealed until further notice. (amb)
April 5, 2021 Filing 12 NOTICE of Filing Exhibit by Lee Mitchell Johnson (mee)
March 23, 2021 Filing 11 SUMMONS (Affidavit) Returned Executed by U.S.Marshals on #1 Complaint 42 USC 1983 or Bivens with a 21 day response/answer filing deadline pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 12 Castillo served on 3/18/2021, answer due 4/8/2021. (mee)
March 16, 2021 Filing 10 Summons Issued as to Cert. Deputy Michaels. (daa)
March 16, 2021 Filing 9 Summons Issued as to Lt. Castillo. (daa)
March 16, 2021 Filing 8 NOTICE of Compliance re ( copy of d.e. #1 , #6 , #9 and #10 sent to U.S. Marshal) re #7 Order Text Modified on 3/16/2021 (mee).
March 16, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 7 ORDER TO U.S. MARSHAL DIRECTING PERSONAL SERVICE UPON DEFENDANTS LT. CASTILLO AND CERT. DEPUTY MICHAELS. Signed by Judge Beth Bloom on 3/16/2021. See attached document for full details. (mee)
March 16, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 6 SCREENING ORDER. Signed by Judge Beth Bloom on 3/16/2021. See attached document for full details. (mee)
March 10, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 5 ORDER OF INSTRUCTIONS. Signed by Judge Beth Bloom on 3/9/2021. See attached document for full details. (mee)
March 10, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 4 ORDER, granting #3 Motion for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis. Plaintiff to Proceed without Prepayment of Filing Fee but Establishing Debt to Clerk of $ 350.00. Granting to the extent that the plaintiff need not prepay even a partial filing fee in this case, or to prepay costs such as for service of process. USM Service NOT Ordered. Signed by Judge Beth Bloom on 3/9/2021. See attached document for full details. (mee)
March 8, 2021 Filing 3 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis by Lee Mitchell Johnson. (daa)
March 8, 2021 Filing 2 Clerks Notice of Judge Assignment to Judge Beth Bloom. (daa)
March 8, 2021 Filing 1 Complaint pursuant to 42 USC 1983 against Castillo, Michaels. Filing fee $ 402.00. IFP Filed, filed by Lee Mitchell Johnson.(daa)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Florida Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Johnson v. Castillo et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Lt. Castillo
Represented By: Summer Marie Barranco
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Cert. Deputy Michaels
Represented By: Summer Marie Barranco
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Lee Mitchell Johnson
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?