MORGAN v. ENTERPRISE LEASING COMPANY OF FLORIDA, LLC.,
| CARL MORGAN |
| ENTERPRISE LEASING COMPANY OF FLORIDA, LLC., doing business as d/b/a ALAMO RENT A CAR |
| 9:2021cv80549 |
| March 15, 2021 |
| US District Court for the Southern District of Florida |
| William P Dimitrouleas |
| William Matthewman |
| Civil Rights: Accommodations |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 12182 |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on October 8, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 13
PAPERLESS ORDER granting [DE 11] Defendant's Second Unopposed Motion for an Extension of Time to Answer or Otherwise Respond to Plaintiff's Complaint. Defendant ENTERPRISE LEASING COMPANY OF FLORIDA, LLC, dba ALAMO RENT A CAR will have through and including June 7, 2021, to file its answer or otherwise respond to Plaintiff's Complaint. Signed by Magistrate Judge William Matthewman on 5/4/2021. (zsa)
|
|
Reset Deadlines ENTERPRISE LEASING COMPANY OF FLORIDA, LLC., answer due 6/7/2021. (cqs)
|
|
Filing 12
ORDER REFERRING CASE to United States Magistrate Judge William Matthewman for Trial. Judge William P. Dimitrouleas no longer assigned as presider judge in case. Signed by Judge William P. Dimitrouleas on 5/3/2021. See attached document for full details. (cds)
|
|
Filing 11
Unopposed MOTION for Extension of Time to File Response/Reply/Answer as to #1 Complaint by ENTERPRISE LEASING COMPANY OF FLORIDA, LLC.,. (Attachments: #1 Text of Proposed Order)(Young, Kevin)
|
|
Filing 10
Notice and Consent to Jurisdiction US Magistrate Judge signed by all parties Notice to Proceed Before a United States Magistrate Judge. Filed by ENTERPRISE LEASING COMPANY OF FLORIDA, LLC., (Young, Kevin)
|
|
Filing 9
ORDER ON MOTION FOR EXTENSION OF TIME granting #8 Unopposed Motion for an Extension of Time to Answer or Otherwise Respond to Plaintiffs Complaint by ENTERPRISE LEASING COMPANY OF FLORIDA, LLC.,. Defendant ENTERPRISE LEASING COMPANY OF FLORIDA, LLC, d/b/a ALAMO RENT A CAR shall have up to and including May 7, 2021 to file its answer or otherwise respond to Plaintiffs Complaint. Answer due 5/7/2021. Signed by Judge William P. Dimitrouleas on 4/1/2021. See attached document for full details. (drz)
|
|
Filing 8
Unopposed MOTION for Extension of Time to File Response/Reply/Answer as to #1 Complaint by ENTERPRISE LEASING COMPANY OF FLORIDA, LLC.,. Attorney Kevin M. Young added to party ENTERPRISE LEASING COMPANY OF FLORIDA, LLC.,(pty:dft). (Attachments: #1 Text of Proposed Order)(Young, Kevin)
|
|
Filing 7
CERTIFICATE of Counsel re #6 Order of Requirements, by Matthew Wilson Dietz on behalf of CARL MORGAN (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A, #2 Exhibit B) (Dietz, Matthew)
|
|
Filing 6
ORDER REQUIRING CERTIFICATE OF COUNSEL REGARDING ANY PRIOR FILINGS UNDER THE AMERICANS WITH DISABILITIES ACT. Accordingly, it is ORDERED AND ADJUDGED that Plaintiffs counsel shall file with the Clerk of the Court the verified statement responding to the questions promulgated above on or before March 25, 2021. Signed by Judge William P. Dimitrouleas on 3/18/2021. See attached document for full details. (cds)
|
|
Filing 5
ORDER REQUIRING COUNSEL TO MEET, FILE JOINT SCHEDULING REPORT AND JOINT DISCOVERY REPORT. Signed by Judge William P. Dimitrouleas on 3/18/2021. See attached document for full details. (cds)
|
|
Filing 4
SUMMONS (Affidavit) Returned Executed on #1 Complaint with a 21 day response/answer filing deadline pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 12 by CARL MORGAN. ENTERPRISE LEASING COMPANY OF FLORIDA, LLC., served on 3/17/2021, answer due 4/7/2021. (Dietz, Matthew)
|
|
Filing 3
Summons Issued as to ENTERPRISE LEASING COMPANY OF FLORIDA, LLC.,. (cds)
|
|
Filing 2
Clerks Notice of Judge Assignment to Judge William P. Dimitrouleas. Pursuant to 28 USC 636(c), the parties are hereby notified that the U.S. Magistrate Judge William Matthewman is available to handle any or all proceedings in this case. If agreed, parties should complete and file the Consent form found on our website. It is not necessary to file a document indicating lack of consent. Pro se (NON-PRISONER) litigants may receive Notices of Electronic Filings (NEFS) via email after filing a Consent by Pro Se Litigant (NON-PRISONER) to Receive Notices of Electronic Filing. The consent form is available under the forms section of our website. (cds)
|
|
Filing 1
COMPLAINT against All Defendants. Filing fees $ 402.00 receipt number AFLSDC-14520918, filed by CARL MORGAN. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Summon(s))(Dietz, Matthew)
|
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Florida Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: MORGAN v. ENTERPRISE LEASING COMPANY OF FLORIDA, LLC., | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant: ENTERPRISE LEASING COMPANY OF FLORIDA, LLC., doing business as d/b/a ALAMO RENT A CAR | |
| Represented By: | Kevin M. Young |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff: CARL MORGAN | |
| Represented By: | Matthew Wilson Dietz |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
