SRAM, LLC v. Princeton Carbon Works Inc.
| SRAM, LLC |
| Princeton Carbon Works Inc. |
| 9:2021cv80581 |
| March 19, 2021 |
| US District Court for the Southern District of Florida |
| Roy K Altman |
| Dave Lee Brannon |
| Patent |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1338 |
| Defendant |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on May 3, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 17
ORDER REQUIRING SCHEDULING REPORT AND CERTIFICATES OF INTERESTED PARTIES - Joint Scheduling Report due by 5/21/2021 Signed by Judge Roy K. Altman on 4/30/2021. See attached document for full details. (ail)
|
| Filing 16 Princeton Carbon Works Inc.'s ANSWER and Affirmative Defenses to Complaint with Jury Demand and, COUNTERCLAIM against SRAM, LLC by Princeton Carbon Works Inc.. (Brafman, David) |
| Filing 15 PAPERLESS OMNIBUS ORDER granting #12 #13 #14 Motions to Appear Pro Hac Vice, Consent to Designation, and Request to Electronically Receive Notices of Electronic Filing for Attorney(s) Andrew H. DeVoogd, Matthew S. Galica, James Wodarski. Signed by U.S. Magistrate Judge Dave Lee Brannon on 4/20/2021. (jb02) |
| Filing 14 MOTION to Appear Pro Hac Vice, Consent to Designation, and Request to Electronically Receive Notices of Electronic Filing for James M. Wodarski. Filing Fee $ 200.00 Receipt # AFLSDC-14618716 by Princeton Carbon Works Inc.. Responses due by 5/3/2021 (Attachments: #1 Certification of James M. Wodarski, Esq., #2 Text of Proposed Order Granting Motion for Appearance Pro Hac Vice of James M. Wodarski, Esq.)(Brafman, David) |
| Filing 13 MOTION to Appear Pro Hac Vice, Consent to Designation, and Request to Electronically Receive Notices of Electronic Filing for Matthew S. Galica. Filing Fee $ 200.00 Receipt # AFLSDC-14618710 by Princeton Carbon Works Inc.. Responses due by 5/3/2021 (Attachments: #1 Certification of Matthew S. Galica, Esq., #2 Text of Proposed Order of Motion for Appearance Pro Hac Vice of Matthew S. Galica)(Brafman, David) |
| Filing 12 MOTION to Appear Pro Hac Vice, Consent to Designation, and Request to Electronically Receive Notices of Electronic Filing for Andrew H. DeVoogd. Filing Fee $ 200.00 Receipt # AFLSDC-14618703 by Princeton Carbon Works Inc.. Responses due by 5/3/2021 (Attachments: #1 Certification of Andrew H. DeVoogd, #2 Text of Proposed Order on Motion to Appear Pro Hac Vice of Andrew H. DeVoogd)(Brafman, David) |
| Set/Reset Answer Due Deadline: Princeton Carbon Works Inc. response due 4/30/2021.SEE DE 11 ORDER (ail) |
|
Filing 11
PAPERLESS ORDER granting in part and denying in part #10 Unopposed Motion for Enlargement of Time. The Defendant shall file a responsive pleading by April 30, 2021. Signed by Judge Roy K. Altman on 4/16/2021. (drd)
|
| Filing 10 Unopposed MOTION for Extension of Time to File Response/Reply/Answer as to #1 Complaint by Princeton Carbon Works Inc.. Attorney David S Brafman added to party Princeton Carbon Works Inc.(pty:dft). (Attachments: #1 Text of Proposed Order on Unopposed Motion for Enlargement of Time)(Brafman, David) |
| Filing 9 PAPERLESS OMNIBUS ORDER granting #7 #8 Motions to Appear Pro Hac Vice, Consent to Designation, and Request to Electronically Receive Notices of Electronic Filing for Attorney(s) Richard B. Walsh, Jr. and Michael J. Hickey. Signed by U.S. Magistrate Judge Dave Lee Brannon on 4/2/2021. (jb02) |
| Filing 8 MOTION to Appear Pro Hac Vice, Consent to Designation, and Request to Electronically Receive Notices of Electronic Filing for Michael J. Hickey. Filing Fee $ 200.00 Receipt # AFLSDC-14572272 by SRAM, LLC. Responses due by 4/15/2021 (Attachments: #1 Text of Proposed Order)(Christu, Eric) |
| Filing 7 MOTION to Appear Pro Hac Vice, Consent to Designation, and Request to Electronically Receive Notices of Electronic Filing for Richard B. Walsh, Jr.. Filing Fee $ 200.00 Receipt # AFLSDC-14572071 by SRAM, LLC. Responses due by 4/15/2021 (Attachments: #1 Text of Proposed Order)(Christu, Eric) |
| Filing 6 SUMMONS (Affidavit) Returned Executed on #1 Complaint with a 21 day response/answer filing deadline pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 12 by SRAM, LLC. Princeton Carbon Works Inc. served on 3/26/2021, answer due 4/16/2021. (Christu, Eric) |
| Filing 5 Bar Letter re: Admissions sent to attorney Richard B. Walsh Jr and Michael J. Hickey, mailing date March 22, 2021, (pt) |
| Filing 4 FORM AO 120 SENT TO DIRECTOR OF U.S. PATENT AND TRADEMARK (Attachments: #1 Supplement Complaint and Exhibits) (jao) |
| Filing 3 Summons Issued as to Princeton Carbon Works Inc.. (jao) |
| Filing 2 Clerks Notice of Judge Assignment to Judge Roy K. Altman and Magistrate Judge Dave Lee Brannon. Pursuant to 28 USC 636(c), the parties are hereby notified that the U.S. Magistrate Judge Dave Lee Brannon is available to handle any or all proceedings in this case. If agreed, parties should complete and file the Consent form found on our website. It is not necessary to file a document indicating lack of consent. Pro se (NON-PRISONER) litigants may receive Notices of Electronic Filings (NEFS) via email after filing a Consent by Pro Se Litigant (NON-PRISONER) to Receive Notices of Electronic Filing. The consent form is available under the forms section of our website. (jao) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against All Defendants. Filing fees $ 402.00 receipt number AFLSDC-14539211, filed by SRAM, LLC. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A, #2 Exhibit B, #3 Summon(s), #4 Civil Cover Sheet)(Christu, Eric) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Florida Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
