Trimis v. Universal Protection Service, LLC
| Michael Trimis |
| Universal Protection Service, LLC |
| 9:2021cv80750 |
| April 21, 2021 |
| US District Court for the Southern District of Florida |
| Kenneth A Marra |
| Civil Rights: Jobs |
| 38 U.S.C. ยง 4311 |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on May 19, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 7 Defendant's Corporate Disclosure Statement by Universal Protection Service, LLC identifying Corporate Parent Universal Protection Service, LP, Corporate Parent Universal Services of America, LP, Corporate Parent Allied Universal Topco LLC, Corporate Parent Wendel SE, Corporate Parent Partners Group Holding AG, Corporate Parent Allied Universal Holdco LLC, Corporate Parent Universal Group Holdings LLC for Universal Protection Service, LLC (Woulfe, Richard) |
| Filing 6 Defendant's ANSWER and Affirmative Defenses to Complaint by Universal Protection Service, LLC. Attorney Richard Thomas Woulfe added to party Universal Protection Service, LLC(pty:dft). (Woulfe, Richard) |
| Filing 5 SUMMONS (Affidavit) Returned Executed on #1 Complaint with a 21 day response/answer filing deadline pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 12 by Michael Trimis. Universal Protection Service, LLC served on 4/28/2021, answer due 5/19/2021. (Hill, Brandon) |
Filing 4
Order Requiring Counsel to Confer and File Joint Scheduling Report. Signed by Judge Kenneth A. Marra on 4/22/2021. See attached document for full details. (ir)
|
| Filing 3 Summons Issued as to Universal Protection Service, LLC. (bb) |
| Filing 2 Clerks Notice of Judge Assignment to Judge Kenneth A. Marra. Pursuant to 28 USC 636(c), the parties are hereby notified that the U.S. Magistrate Judge William Matthewman is available to handle any or all proceedings in this case. If agreed, parties should complete and file the Consent form found on our website. It is not necessary to file a document indicating lack of consent. Pro se (NON-PRISONER) litigants may receive Notices of Electronic Filings (NEFS) via email after filing a Consent by Pro Se Litigant (NON-PRISONER) to Receive Notices of Electronic Filing. The consent form is available under the forms section of our website. (bb) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against Universal Protection Service, LLC. Filing fees $ 402.00 receipt number AFLSDC-14625574, filed by Michael Trimis. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Summon(s))(Hill, Brandon) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Florida Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: Trimis v. Universal Protection Service, LLC | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff: Michael Trimis | |
| Represented By: | Brandon J Hill |
| Represented By: | Amanda E Heystek |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant: Universal Protection Service, LLC | |
| Represented By: | Richard Thomas Woulfe |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
