Todd Graves Golf School ,LLC v. Junge
| Todd Graves Golf School,LLC |
| Kirk Alan Junge doing business as Single Plan Golf Schools |
| Kirk Alan Junge |
| 9:2021cv80793 |
| April 29, 2021 |
| U.S. District Court for the Southern District of Florida |
| Aileen M Cannon |
| Trademark |
| 15 U.S.C. § 44 |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on June 18, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 20 First Certificate of Other Affiliates/Corporate Disclosure Statement - NONE disclosed by Kirk Alan Junge (Tandy, Heidi) |
| Filing 19 Certificate of Other Affiliates/Corporate Disclosure Statement by Todd Graves Golf School,LLC (Green, Ishmael) |
| Filing 18 Second MOTION to Stay re #14 SCHEDULING REPORT - Rule 26(f)/16.1 by Kirk Alan Junge. Responses due by 6/28/2021 (Attachments: #1 Exhibit Exhibit A, #2 Exhibit Exhibit B, #3 Exhibit Exhibit C, #4 Exhibit Exhibit D, #5 Text of Proposed Order Proposed Order)(Tandy, Heidi) |
Filing 17
PAPERLESS ORDER denying without prejudice #16 Defendant's Motion to Stay Proceedings. Defendant's Motion does not contain a certificate of conference, as required by S.D. Fla. L.R. 7.1(a)(3). Signed by Judge Aileen M. Cannon on Judge 13, 2021. (ahz)
|
| Filing 16 First MOTION to Stay Proceedings by Kirk Alan Junge. Responses due by 6/25/2021 (Attachments: #1 Exhibit, #2 Exhibit, #3 Exhibit, #4 Text of Proposed Order)(Tandy, Heidi) |
| Filing 15 ANSWER to Counterclaim by Todd Graves Golf School,LLC. (Green, Ishmael) |
| Filing 14 Joint SCHEDULING REPORT - Rule 16.1 by Todd Graves Golf School,LLC (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A)(Green, Ishmael) |
| Filing 13 ANSWER and Affirmative Defenses to Complaint , COUNTERCLAIM against Kirk Alan Junge by Kirk Alan Junge. (Tandy, Heidi) |
Filing 12
ORDER Requiring Joint Scheduling Report And Certificates Of Interested Parties. Joint Scheduling Report And Certificates Of Interested Parties are due by 6/18/2021. Signed by Judge Aileen M. Cannon on 5/24/2021. See attached document for full details. (kpe)
|
Filing 11
PAPERLESS ORDER granting #10 Defendant's Renewed Motion for Extension of Time to Answer Complaint. Defendant shall file an answer or responsive motion to the Complaint by no later than June 4, 2021. Signed by Judge Aileen M. Cannon on May 20, 2021. (ahz)
|
| Set Answer Due Deadline per DE 11 Order: Kirk Alan Junge response due 6/4/2021. (kpe) |
| Filing 10 Renewed MOTION for Extension of Time Extension in Time to Respond to Complaint on 6/4/2021 re #1 Complaint, by Kirk Alan Junge. Responses due by 6/2/2021 (Attachments: #1 Exhibit Proposed Order)(Tandy, Heidi) |
Filing 9
PAPERLESS ORDER striking #7 Defendant's Unopposed Motion for Extension of Time to Answer Complaint; and striking #8 Defendant's Proposed Order Granting Unopposed Motion for Extension of Time to Answer Complaint. Pursuant to Local Rule 7.1(a)(2), motions for extension of time "shall be accompanied by a proposed order that is filed and served via e-mail to the Court as prescribed by Section 3I(6) of the CM/ECF Administrative Procedures." S.D. Fla. L.R. 7.1(a)(2). Defendant incorrectly filed its proposed order #8 as a Motion on CM/ECF. Moreover, Defendant's Motion for Extension of Time #7 fails to set forth a basis for the enlargement sought, and parties cannot unilaterally amend Court deadlines by agreement. Accordingly, if Defendant chooses to file a renewed motion for more time, it must explain the basis for its requested extension, attach a proposed order as an exhibit to the motion on CM/ECF, and also submit a Word version of the proposed order via the Court's e-mail address at [email protected]. Signed by Judge Aileen M. Cannon on May 19, 2021. (ahz)
|
| Filing 8 STRICKEN Proposed Order re First MOTION for Extension of Time Extension in Time to Respond to Complaint filed 4/29/21 re #7 First MOTION for Extension of Time to File Response/Reply/Answer as to #1 Complaint, by Kirk Alan Junge. Responses due by 6/1/2021 (Tandy, Heidi) Modified on 5/19/2021 per DE 9 Order(kpe). |
| Filing 7 STRICKEN First MOTION for Extension of Time to File Response/Reply/Answer as to #1 Complaint, by Kirk Alan Junge. (Tandy, Heidi) Modified on 5/19/2021 per DE 9 Order(kpe). |
| Filing 6 NOTICE of Attorney Appearance by Heidi Howard Tandy on behalf of Kirk Alan Junge. Attorney Heidi Howard Tandy added to party Kirk Alan Junge(pty:dft). (Tandy, Heidi) |
| Filing 5 Summons Issued as to Kirk Alan Junge. (kpe) |
| Filing 4 NOTICE of Filing Proposed Summons(es) by Todd Graves Golf School,LLC re #1 Complaint, filed by Todd Graves Golf School,LLC (Green, Ishmael) |
| Filing 3 FORM AO 120 SENT TO DIRECTOR OF U.S. PATENT AND TRADEMARK. (kpe) |
| Filing 2 Clerks Notice of Judge Assignment to Judge Aileen M. Cannon. Pursuant to 28 USC 636(c), the parties are hereby notified that the U.S. Magistrate Judge Dave Lee Brannon is available to handle any or all proceedings in this case. If agreed, parties should complete and file the Consent form found on our website. It is not necessary to file a document indicating lack of consent. Pro se (NON-PRISONER) litigants may receive Notices of Electronic Filings (NEFS) via email after filing a Consent by Pro Se Litigant (NON-PRISONER) to Receive Notices of Electronic Filing. The consent form is available under the forms section of our website. (kpe) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against All Defendants. Filing fees $ 402.00 receipt number AFLSDC-14647442, filed by Todd Graves Golf School,LLC. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Exhibit A, #3 Exhibit B, #4 Exhibit C, #5 Exhibit D)(Green, Ishmael) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the U.S. Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Florida Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.