Karafin v. Elsevier, Inc.
| Brian Karafin |
| Elsevier Inc. and Elsevier, Inc. |
| 9:2021cv81220 |
| July 12, 2021 |
| US District Court for the Southern District of Florida |
| Kenneth A Marra |
| Labor: Fair Standards |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1441 |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on September 3, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 12 Defendant's Amended ANSWER and Affirmative Defenses to Amended Complaint , COUNTERCLAIM against Brian Karafin by Elsevier, Inc.. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A - W-2s, #2 Exhibit B - Earnings Statements, #3 Exhibit C - Job Description, #4 Exhibit D - Separation Agreement)(Young, Kevin) |
| Filing 11 Defendant's ANSWER and Affirmative Defenses to Amended Complaint , Defendant's COUNTERCLAIM against Brian Karafin by Elsevier, Inc.. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A - W2s)(Young, Kevin) |
Filing 10
ORDER denying as moot #4 Motion to Dismiss for Failure to State a Claim. Signed by Judge Kenneth A. Marra on 8/13/2021. See attached document for full details. (ir)
|
| Filing 9 Plaintiff's AMENDED COMPLAINT AND JURY TRIAL DEMAND against Elsevier, Inc. filed in response to Order Granting Motion for Leave, filed by Brian Karafin.(Glassberg, David) |
|
Filing 8
ORDER granting #7 Consent Motion to Dismiss; granting #7 Motion for Leave to File. Clerks Notice: Filer must separately re-file the amended pleading pursuant to Local Rule 15.1, unless otherwise ordered by the Judge. Signed by Judge Kenneth A. Marra on 8/2/2021. See attached document for full details. (ir)
|
| Filing 7 Consent MOTION to Dismiss #4 MOTION TO DISMISS #1 Notice of Removal (State Court Complaint), FOR FAILURE TO STATE A CLAIM ( Responses due by 8/16/2021), MOTION for Leave to File by Brian Karafin. (Attachments: #1 Text of Proposed Order Proposed Order to Dismiss)(Glassberg, David) |
| Filing 6 Corporate Disclosure Statement by Elsevier, Inc. identifying Corporate Parent Elsevier STM Inc, Other Affiliate RELX Inc., Other Affiliate RELX PLC (LSE: REL; NYSE: RELX) for Elsevier, Inc. (Young, Kevin) |
| Filing 5 Notice of NO Pending, Refiled, Related or Similar Actions by Elsevier, Inc. (Young, Kevin) |
| Filing 4 MOTION TO DISMISS #1 Notice of Removal (State Court Complaint), FOR FAILURE TO STATE A CLAIM by Elsevier, Inc.. Responses due by 8/2/2021 (Young, Kevin) |
|
Filing 3
Order Requiring Counsel to Confer and File Joint Scheduling Report. Signed by Judge Kenneth A. Marra on 7/13/2021. See attached document for full details. (ir)
|
| Filing 2 Clerks Notice of Judge Assignment to Judge Kenneth A. Marra and Magistrate Judge William Matthewman. Pursuant to 28 USC 636(c), the parties are hereby notified that the U.S. Magistrate Judge William Matthewman is available to handle any or all proceedings in this case. If agreed, parties should complete and file the Consent form found on our website. It is not necessary to file a document indicating lack of consent. Pro se (NON-PRISONER) litigants may receive Notices of Electronic Filings (NEFS) via email after filing a Consent by Pro Se Litigant (NON-PRISONER) to Receive Notices of Electronic Filing. The consent form is available under the forms section of our website. (bb) |
| Filing 1 NOTICE OF REMOVAL (STATE COURT COMPLAINT - Brian Karafin v. Elsevier Inc., a For Profit Delaware Corporation) Filing fee $ 402.00 receipt number AFLSDC-14838025, filed by Elsevier Inc.. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Exhibit A, #3 Exhibit B)(Young, Kevin) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Florida Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
