Charlene Simmons v. GlaxoSmithKline, LLC et al
| Charlene Simmons |
| Glaxosmithkline LLC, Pfizer Inc, Boehringer Ingelheim Pharmaceuticals, Inc., Boehringer Ingelheim USA Corporation, Sanofi U.S. Services Inc., Sanofi-Aventis U.S. LLC, CVS Pharmacy Inc., Does 1 through 100, inclusive and Garfield Beach CVS, LLC |
| 9:2021cv81539 |
| August 30, 2021 |
| US District Court for the Southern District of Florida |
| Robin L Rosenberg |
| Personal Injury: Health Care/Pharmaceutical Personal Injury Product Liability |
| 28 U.S.C. § 1441 |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on September 14, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 17
ORDER OF CONSOLIDATION AND ADMINISTRATIVE CLOSE-OUT. Signed by Judge Robin L. Rosenberg on 9/14/2021. See attached document for full details. (mc)
|
| Filing 16 MDL Transfer In Case Receipt from Central District of California. Case Number 2:21-cv-06465 with documents 1-13. Assigned FLSD Case Number 9:21-cv-81539-RLR Charlene Simmons v. GlaxoSmithKline, LLC et al on 8/30/2021. Re: FLSD MDL Case Number 9:20-md-02924-RLR pursuant to Conditional Transfer Order 73. Clerks Note: JPML notified (mc) |
| Filing 15 Clerks Notice of Judge Assignment to Judge Robin L. Rosenberg. (mc) |
| Filing 14 Case transferred in from California Central; Case Number 2:21-cv-06465. Electronic file including transfer order and docket sheet received. .(mc). |
| Filing 13 Conditional Transfer Order (CTO-73) from the United States Judicial Panel on Multidistrict Litigation, MDL 2924, transferring case to USDC, Southern District of Florida for coordinated or consolidated pretrial proceedings, and with the consent of that court, assigned to Honorable Robin L. Rosenberg. Case transferred electronically. (MD JS-6. Case Terminated.) (jp) |
| Filing 12 FIRST AMENDED COMPLAINT against Defendants All Defendants amending Complaint - (Discovery),, filed by Plaintiff Charlene Simmons(Rueb, Gregory) |
| Filing 11 STIPULATION Extending Time to Answer the complaint as to All Parties, filed by Defendant Boehringer Ingelheim USA Corporation, Boehringer Ingelheim Pharmaceuticals, Inc..(Blaschke, Matthew) |
|
Filing 10
STANDING ORDERS FOR CIVIL CASES ASSIGNED TO JUDGE JOHN A. KRONSTADT upon filing of the complaint by Judge John A. Kronstadt. Please read each Order carefully as they differ in some respects from the Local Rules. Counsel are advised that the Court, at any time, may amend one or more of its Standing Orders. It is the responsibility of counsel to refer to this Court's Procedures and Schedules found on the website for the United States District Court, Central District of California (www.cacd.uscourts.gov) to obtain the operative order. The Court thanks the parties and their counsel for their anticipated cooperation in carrying out these requirements. (droj)
|
|
Filing 9
ORDER TO REASSIGN CASE due to self-recusal pursuant to General Order 21-01 by Judge Percy Anderson. Case transferred from Judge Percy Anderson to the calendar of Judge John A. Kronstadt for all further proceedings. Case number now reads as 2:21-cv-06465 JAK (MAAx). (esa)
|
| Filing 8 CIVIL COVER SHEET filed by Defendants Boehringer Ingelheim Pharmaceuticals, Inc., Boehringer Ingelheim USA Corporation. (Blaschke, Matthew) |
| Filing 7 NOTICE OF DEFICIENCIES in Attorney Case Opening RE: Notice of Removal (Attorney Civil Case Opening),, #1 . The following error(s) was found: Other error(s) with document(s): Attachment 1 Civil Cover Sheet should be e-filed separately. The correct event category is located under Civil Events Other Filings Miscellaneous Filings.. (car) |
| Filing 6 Notice to Counsel Re Consent to Proceed Before a United States Magistrate Judge. (car) |
| Filing 5 NOTICE TO PARTIES OF COURT-DIRECTED ADR PROGRAM filed. (car) |
| Filing 4 NOTICE OF ASSIGNMENT to District Judge Percy Anderson and Magistrate Judge Maria A. Audero. (car) |
| Filing 3 NOTICE of Interested Parties filed by Defendant Boehringer Ingelheim Pharmaceuticals, Inc., Boehringer Ingelheim USA Corporation, identifying Boehringer Ingelheim USA Corporation, Boehringer Ingelheim Corporation, and Boehringer Ingelheim International GmbH. (Blaschke, Matthew) |
| Filing 2 CORPORATE DISCLOSURE STATEMENT filed by Defendants Boehringer Ingelheim Pharmaceuticals, Inc., Boehringer Ingelheim USA Corporation identifying Boehringer Ingelheim USA Corporation, Boehringer Ingelheim Corporation, and Boehringer Ingelheim International GmbH as Corporate Parent. (Blaschke, Matthew) |
| CONFORMED COPY OF COMPLAINT against Defendants Boehringer Ingelheim Pharmaceuticals, Inc., Boehringer Ingelheim USA Corporation, CVS Pharmacy, Inc., Does 1 through 100, inclusive, GlaxoSmithKline, LLC, Pfizer, Inc., Sanofi US Services Inc., Sanofi-Aventis U.S. LLC. Jury Demanded, filed by Plaintiff Charlene Simmons. Filed in State Court on 6/30/2021 Submitted with Attachment 2 to Notice of Removal #1 (car) |
| Filing 1 NOTICE OF REMOVAL from Superior Court of Los Angeles County, California, case number 21STCV24150 Receipt No: ACACDC-31785310 - Fee: $402, filed by Defendant Boehringer Ingelheim USA Corporation, Boehringer Ingelheim Pharmaceuticals, Inc.. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Exhibit 1 - Complaint) (Attorney Matthew James Blaschke added to party Boehringer Ingelheim Pharmaceuticals, Inc.(pty:dft), Attorney Matthew James Blaschke added to party Boehringer Ingelheim USA Corporation(pty:dft))(Blaschke, Matthew) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Florida Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
