Dehaan v. CC FRANCHISE GROUP, INC. et al
Kevin Dehaan |
CC FRANCHISE GROUP, INC. and Mark B Cohen |
9:2021cv81724 |
September 13, 2021 |
US District Court for the Southern District of Florida |
Rodney Smith |
Consumer Credit |
15 U.S.C. ยง 1692 |
Plaintiff |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on October 19, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 12 ORDER OF DISMISSAL re #11 Notice of Voluntary Dismissal with Prejudice. All pending motions not otherwise ruled upon are DENIED as moot. Closing Case. Signed by Judge Rodney Smith on 10/19/2021. See attached document for full details. (jao) |
Filing 11 NOTICE of Voluntary Dismissal with prejudice by Kevin Dehaan (Phillips, Jason) |
Filing 10 Order Dismissing Party CC FRANCHISE GROUP, INC. re #9 Joint Stipulation for Dismissal with Prejudice as to Defendant, CC Franchise Group, Inc. Only Signed by Judge Rodney Smith on 10/8/2021. See attached document for full details. (jao) |
Filing 9 STIPULATION of Dismissal of Defendant CC FRANCHISE GROUP, INC. only with Prejudice by CC FRANCHISE GROUP, INC. (Attachments: #1 Text of Proposed Order)(Kohlmyer, Ernest) |
Filing 8 ORDER REQUIRING JOINT SCHEDULING REPORT, CERTIFICATES OF INTERESTED PARTIES AND CORPORATE DISCLOSURE STATEMENTS. Due by 10/22/2021. Signed by Judge Rodney Smith on 10/1/2021. See attached document for full details. (pes) |
Filing 7 PAPERLESS ORDER GRANTING #6 Defendants' Motion for Extension of Time to Respond to the Complaint. Defendants shall respond to the Complaint no later than October 18, 2021. Signed by Judge Rodney Smith on 10/1/2021. (zgs) |
Filing 6 Unopposed MOTION for Extension of Time to File Response/Reply/Answer as to #1 Complaint, by CC FRANCHISE GROUP, INC., Mark B Cohen. Attorney Ernest Henry Kohlmyer, III added to party CC FRANCHISE GROUP, INC.(pty:dft), Attorney Ernest Henry Kohlmyer, III added to party Mark B Cohen(pty:dft). (Attachments: #1 Text of Proposed Order)(Kohlmyer, Ernest) |
Filing 5 SUMMONS (Affidavit) Returned Executed on #1 Complaint, with a 21 day response/answer filing deadline pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 12 by Kevin Dehaan. CC FRANCHISE GROUP, INC. served on 9/17/2021, answer due 10/8/2021. (Phillips, Jason) |
Filing 4 SUMMONS (Affidavit) Returned Executed on #1 Complaint, with a 21 day response/answer filing deadline pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 12 by Kevin Dehaan. Mark B Cohen served on 9/17/2021, answer due 10/8/2021. (Phillips, Jason) |
Filing 3 Summons Issued as to CC FRANCHISE GROUP, INC., Mark B Cohen. (jao) |
Filing 2 Clerks Notice of Judge Assignment to Judge Rodney Smith. Pursuant to 28 USC 636(c), the parties are hereby notified that the U.S. Magistrate Judge William Matthewman is available to handle any or all proceedings in this case. If agreed, parties should complete and file the Consent form found on our website. It is not necessary to file a document indicating lack of consent. Pro se (NON-PRISONER) litigants may receive Notices of Electronic Filings (NEFS) via email after filing a Consent by Pro Se Litigant (NON-PRISONER) to Receive Notices of Electronic Filing. The consent form is available under the forms section of our website. (jao) |
Filing 1 COMPLAINT against CC FRANCHISE GROUP, INC., Mark B Cohen. Filing fees $ 402.00. Pay.gov Agency Tracking ID FLSDC-AFLSDC-15006048, payment transferred from : 21cv81723 Dehaan v. CC Franchise Group, filed by Kevin Dehaan. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Exhibit, #3 Summon(s), #4 Summon(s))(Phillips, Jason) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Florida Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.