Kelly v. Sanofi SA et al
| Susan Kelly |
| Sanofi SA, Sanofi US Services, Inc., Sanofi-Aventis US LLC, Boehringer Ingelheim Pharmaceuticals, Inc., Chattem, Inc. and GlaxoSmithKline, LLC |
| 9:2021cv81796 |
| September 23, 2021 |
| US District Court for the Southern District of Florida |
| Robin L Rosenberg |
| Personal Injury: Health Care/Pharmaceutical Personal Injury Product Liability |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on October 4, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 4 MDL Tag-Along Case Receipt from Southern District of Florida. Case Number 9:21-cv-81796-RLR Kelly v. Sanofi SA et al with documents 1-3. Re: FLSD MDL Case Number 9:20-md-02924-RLR. Clerks Note: JPML notified (mc) |
| Cases associated 9:20-md-2924-RLR. (mc) |
Filing 3
ORDER OF CONSOLIDATION AND ADMINISTRATIVE CLOSE-OUT. Signed by Judge Robin L. Rosenberg on 9/28/2021. See attached document for full details. (mc)
|
| Filing 2 Judge Assignment to Judge Robin L. Rosenberg. (scn) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against Boehringer Ingelheim Pharmaceuticals, Inc., Chattem, Inc., GlaxoSmithKline, LLC, Sanofi SA, Sanofi US Services, Inc., Sanofi-Aventis US LLC. Filing fees $ 402.00 receipt number AFLSDC-15037124, filed by Susan Kelly. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet Civil Cover Sheet)(Carlson, Craig) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Florida Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
