Hornig et al v. Sanofi-Aventis US, LLC et al
| Edward Hornig, Jr. and Cyndi Hornig |
| Sanofi-Aventis U.S. LLC, Sanofi U.S. Services Inc., Boehringer Ingelheim Pharmaceuticals Inc. and Inc Pfizer |
| 9:2021cv81831 |
| September 29, 2021 |
| US District Court for the Southern District of Florida |
| Robin L Rosenberg |
| Tort Product Liability |
| 28 U.S.C. § 1332 |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on October 7, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 17
ORDER OF CONSOLIDATION AND ADMINISTRATIVE CLOSE-OUT. Signed by Judge Robin L. Rosenberg on 10/7/2021. See attached document for full details. (mc)
|
| Filing 16 Clerks Notice of Docket Correction. Document Filed in Wrong Case; DE# 14 and DE# 15 , Document restricted and docket text modified. Document refiled in correct case # 21-cv-81381. (jas) |
| Filing 13 MDL Transfer In Case Receipt from District of Nebraska. Case Number 8:21-cv-00349 with documents 1-10. Assigned FLSD Case Number 9:21-cv-81831-RLR. Re: FLSD MDL Case Number Hornig et al v. Sanofi-Aventis US, LLC et al on 9/29/2021 pursuant to Conditional Transfer Order 77. Clerks Note: JPML notified (mc) |
| Filing 12 Clerks Notice of Judge Assignment to Judge Robin L. Rosenberg. (mc) |
| Filing 11 Case transferred in from Nebraska; Case Number 8:21-cv-00349. Electronic file including transfer order and docket sheet received. .(mc). |
| Filing 10 CERTIFIED COPY OF CONDITIONAL TRANSFER ORDER. Case is transferred to USDC-Southern District of Florida, Docket No. 2924., Civil Case Terminated. (Attachments: #1 MDL Letter) (MKR) |
| Filing 9 COPY OF CONDITIONAL TRANSFER ORDER from the Multidistrict Litigation Panel. Clerk to wait for certified copy of order to transfer the file to USDC-Southern District of Florida, Docket No. 2924. (ADB) |
| Case transferred to District of Southern District of Florida. Original electronic file sent. (MKR) |
| Filing 8 Summons Issued as to defendants Boehringer Ingelheim Pharmaceuticals, Inc., Pfizer, Inc., Sanofi US Services, Inc. and Sanofi-Aventis US, LLC. YOU MUST PRINT YOUR ISSUED SUMMONS, WHICH ARE ATTACHED TO THIS DOCUMENT. PAPER COPIES WILL NOT BE MAILED. (LRM) |
| Filing 7 LETTER by Clerk regarding Complaint #1 with copy of docket sheet to Multidistrict Litigation Panel Office. (LRM) |
| Filing 6 TEXT NOTICE OF JUDGES ASSIGNED: Chief Judge Robert F. Rossiter, Jr. and Magistrate Judge Michael D. Nelson assigned. In accordance with 28 U.S.C. 636(c)(2), the parties are notified that, if all parties consent, a magistrate judge may conduct a civil action or proceeding, including a jury or nonjury trial, subject to the courts rules and policies governing the assignment of judges in civil cases. See Fed. R. Civ. P. 73; NEGenR 1.4. (LRM) |
| Filing 5 Summons Requested as to Pfizer, Inc. regarding Complaint, #1 . (Domina, David) |
| Filing 4 Summons Requested as to Boehringer Ingelheim Pharmaceuticals, Inc. regarding Complaint, #1 . (Domina, David) |
| Filing 3 Summons Requested as to Sanofi US Services, Inc regarding Complaint, #1 . (Domina, David) |
| Filing 2 Summons Requested as to Sanofi-Aventis US LLC regarding Complaint, #1 . (Domina, David) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT with jury demand against All Defendants ( Filing fee $ 402, receipt number ANEDC-4471773), by Attorney David A. Domina on behalf of Edward Hornig, Jr., Cyndi Hornig (Attachments: #1 Exhibit Short Form Complaint)(Domina, David) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Florida Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
