Kappock v. Ingalls Marine Diesel, Inc. et al
Plaintiff: Jonathan Kappock
Defendant: Ingalls Marine Diesel, Inc. and Matthew Ingalls
Case Number: 9:2021cv81929
Filed: October 18, 2021
Court: US District Court for the Southern District of Florida
Presiding Judge: Donald M Middlebrooks
Nature of Suit: Labor: Fair Standards
Cause of Action: 29 U.S.C. ยง 0201
Jury Demanded By: Plaintiff
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on December 15, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
December 15, 2021 Filing 14 RESPONSE in Opposition re #10 Plaintiff's MOTION to Strike #7 Answer to Complaint, Affirmative Defenses filed by Matthew Ingalls, Ingalls Marine Diesel, Inc.. Replies due by 12/22/2021. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A - Correspondence to Counsel)(Robertson, Lauren)
December 6, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 13 PAPERLESS ORDER granting #12 Plaintiff's Motion for Clarification. Plaintiff seeks clarification of Paperless Order (DE 11 ). The court notes that the apparent redactions appear to have been a technical error which have since been resolved. As such, Plaintiff's Motion to Strike (DE #10 ) is accepted and no refiling is required. Signed by Judge Donald M. Middlebrooks on 12/6/2021. (kal)
December 3, 2021 Filing 12 Plaintiff's MOTION for clarification 11 Order,, Set/Reset Deadlines, by Jonathan Kappock. Responses due by 12/17/2021 (Morgado, Allyson)
December 2, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 11 PAPERLESS ORDER REQUIRING RE-FILING of #10 Motion to Strike. Upon review of this Motion, it appears that several citations are redacted. Plaintiff shall re-file this Motion without redacted citations on or by December 3, 2021. Signed by Judge Donald M. Middlebrooks on 12/2/2021. (kal)
December 1, 2021 Filing 10 Plaintiff's MOTION to Strike #7 Answer to Complaint, Affirmative Defenses by Jonathan Kappock. Responses due by 12/15/2021 (Morgado, Allyson)
November 15, 2021 Filing 9 Plaintiff's Certificate of Other Affiliates/Corporate Disclosure Statement by Jonathan Kappock (Kleppin, Chris)
November 15, 2021 Filing 8 Certificate of Other Affiliates/Corporate Disclosure Statement - NONE disclosed by Ingalls Marine Diesel, Inc. (Robertson, Lauren)
November 10, 2021 Filing 7 ANSWER and Affirmative Defenses to Complaint by Matthew Ingalls, Ingalls Marine Diesel, Inc.. Attorney Lauren C. Robertson added to party Matthew Ingalls(pty:dft), Attorney Lauren C. Robertson added to party Ingalls Marine Diesel, Inc.(pty:dft). (Robertson, Lauren)
November 10, 2021 Filing 6 NOTICE of Attorney Appearance by Kimberly J. Doud on behalf of Matthew Ingalls, Ingalls Marine Diesel, Inc.. Attorney Kimberly J. Doud added to party Matthew Ingalls(pty:dft), Attorney Kimberly J. Doud added to party Ingalls Marine Diesel, Inc.(pty:dft). (Doud, Kimberly)
October 26, 2021 Filing 5 SUMMONS (Affidavit) Returned Executed on #1 Complaint with a 21 day response/answer filing deadline pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 12 by Jonathan Kappock. Matthew Ingalls served on 10/20/2021, response/answer due 11/10/2021. (Morgado, Allyson)
October 26, 2021 Filing 4 SUMMONS (Affidavit) Returned Executed on #1 Complaint with a 21 day response/answer filing deadline pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 12 by Jonathan Kappock. Ingalls Marine Diesel, Inc. served on 10/20/2021, response/answer due 11/10/2021. (Morgado, Allyson)
October 19, 2021 Filing 3 Summons Issued as to Matthew Ingalls, Ingalls Marine Diesel, Inc.. (cds)
October 18, 2021 Filing 2 Clerks Notice of Judge Assignment to Judge Donald M. Middlebrooks. Pursuant to 28 USC 636(c), the parties are hereby notified that the U.S. Magistrate Judge William Matthewman is available to handle any or all proceedings in this case. If agreed, parties should complete and file the Consent form found on our website. It is not necessary to file a document indicating lack of consent. Pro se (NON-PRISONER) litigants may receive Notices of Electronic Filings (NEFS) via email after filing a Consent by Pro Se Litigant (NON-PRISONER) to Receive Notices of Electronic Filing. The consent form is available under the forms section of our website. (cds)
October 18, 2021 Filing 1 COMPLAINT against Matthew Ingalls, Ingalls Marine Diesel, Inc.. Filing fees $ 402.00 receipt number AFLSDC-15101053, filed by Jonathan Kappock. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Summon(s), #3 Summon(s))(Morgado, Allyson)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Florida Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Kappock v. Ingalls Marine Diesel, Inc. et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Jonathan Kappock
Represented By: Allyson Morgado
Represented By: Chris Kleppin
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Ingalls Marine Diesel, Inc.
Represented By: Kimberly J. Doud
Represented By: Lauren C. Robertson
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Matthew Ingalls
Represented By: Kimberly J. Doud
Represented By: Lauren C. Robertson
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?