Siegel v. Blue Cross & Blue Shield of Florida, Inc.
Plaintiff: Evan Siegel
Defendant: Blue Cross & Blue Shield of Florida Inc. and Blue Cross & Blue Shield of Florida, Inc.
Case Number: 9:2021cv81973
Filed: October 25, 2021
Court: US District Court for the Southern District of Florida
Presiding Judge: Raag Singhal
Nature of Suit: Labor: E.R.I.S.A.
Cause of Action: 29 U.S.C. ยง 1132
Jury Demanded By: None
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on December 23, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
December 23, 2021 Filing 10 NOTICE of Attorney Appearance by Crystal Boni Carswell on behalf of Blue Cross & Blue Shield of Florida, Inc.. Attorney Crystal Boni Carswell added to party Blue Cross & Blue Shield of Florida, Inc.(pty:dft). (Carswell, Crystal)
December 21, 2021 Filing 9 Defendant's Corporate Disclosure Statement Rule 7.1 by Blue Cross & Blue Shield of Florida, Inc. identifying Corporate Parent GuideWell Mutual Holding Corporation for Blue Cross & Blue Shield of Florida, Inc. (Uhlemann, Justin)
December 21, 2021 Filing 8 NOTICE of Striking #7 Initial Disclosure(s) filed by Blue Cross & Blue Shield of Florida, Inc. by Blue Cross & Blue Shield of Florida, Inc. (Uhlemann, Justin)
December 21, 2021 Filing 7 Initial Disclosure(s) of Blue Cross and Blue Shield of Florida Inc's Rule 7.1 Disclosure Statement by Blue Cross & Blue Shield of Florida, Inc. (Uhlemann, Justin)
December 21, 2021 Filing 6 Unopposed MOTION for Extension of Time to File Response/Reply/Answer as to #1 Complaint, by Blue Cross & Blue Shield of Florida, Inc.. Attorney Justin Brian Uhlemann added to party Blue Cross & Blue Shield of Florida, Inc.(pty:dft). (Attachments: #1 Text of Proposed Order Extending Defendant's Deadline to Respond to Complaint)(Uhlemann, Justin)
October 29, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 5 Order Requiring Joint Scheduling Report And Certificates of Interested Parties. Signed by Judge Raag Singhal on 10/29/2021. See attached document for full details. (vmz)
October 29, 2021 Filing 4 NOTICE OF COURT PRACTICEUnless otherwise specified by the Court, every motion, legal memorandum, brief, and otherwise shall: be double-spaced, in justified alignment, in 12-point font, using either Times New Roman or Arial typeface. This Notice does not supplant the requirements and provisions of Local Rule 7.1(c). The Court cautions parties against excessive use of footnotes.Multiple Plaintiffs or Defendants shall file joint motions with co-parties unless there are clear conflicts of position. If conflicts of position exist, parties shall explain the conflicts in their separate motions.Parties are encouraged to seek extensions of time in a timely fashion. "A motion for extension of time is not self-executing; no motion is, unless expressly provided for by the applicable rule. Yet, by filing these motions on or near the last day, and then sitting idle pending the Court's disposition of the motion, parties essentially grant their own motion. The Court will not condone this." Compere v. Nusret Miami, LLC, 2020 WL 2844888, at *2 (S.D. Fla. May 7, 2020) (internal citations omitted).Local Rule 16.4, Local Rules for the United States District Court for the Southern District of Florida, requires that a Notice of Settlement "shall be filed and served jointly by counsel for all parties to the settlement." A unilateral notice of settlement will not stay pre-trial deadlines or hearings.Failure to comply with any of these procedures may result in the imposition of appropriate sanctions. Signed by Judge Raag Singhal on 10/29/2021. (eca)
October 26, 2021 Filing 3 Summons Issued as to Blue Cross & Blue Shield of Florida, Inc.. (kpe)
October 25, 2021 Filing 2 Clerks Notice of Judge Assignment to Judge Raag Singhal. Pursuant to 28 USC 636(c), the parties are hereby notified that the U.S. Magistrate Judge William Matthewman is available to handle any or all proceedings in this case. If agreed, parties should complete and file the Consent form found on our website. It is not necessary to file a document indicating lack of consent. (kpe)
October 25, 2021 Filing 1 COMPLAINT against Blue Cross & Blue Shield of Florida Inc.. Filing fees $ 402.00 receipt number AFLSDC-15120627, filed by Evan Siegel. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit Exhibit 1 - Plan, #2 Civil Cover Sheet Civil cover sheet, #3 Summon(s) Summons)(Denes, Gregory)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Florida Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Siegel v. Blue Cross & Blue Shield of Florida, Inc.
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Evan Siegel
Represented By: Gregory Lance Denes
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Blue Cross & Blue Shield of Florida Inc.
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Blue Cross & Blue Shield of Florida, Inc.
Represented By: Crystal Boni Carswell
Represented By: Justin Brian Uhlemann
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?