Sacks v. MNET Financial, Inc.
Plaintiff: Elsa Sacks
Defendant: MNET Financial, Inc.
Case Number: 9:2021cv82013
Filed: November 2, 2021
Court: US District Court for the Southern District of Florida
Presiding Judge: Aileen M Cannon
Nature of Suit: Consumer Credit
Cause of Action: 28 U.S.C. ยง 1441
Jury Demanded By: Defendant
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on December 23, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
December 23, 2021 Filing 10 NOTICE of Settlement by Elsa Sacks. Attorney Thomas John Patti, III added to party Elsa Sacks(pty:pla). (Patti, Thomas)
December 17, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 9 ORDER STAYING CASE. Case is administratively closed. Signed by Judge Aileen M. Cannon on 12/17/2021. See attached document for full details. (jas)
December 15, 2021 Filing 8 Unopposed MOTION to Stay by MNET Financial, Inc.. Responses due by 12/29/2021 (Philip-Spengler, Sangeeta)
December 2, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 7 ORDER Requiring Joint Scheduling Report And Certificates Of Interested Parties. Joint Scheduling Report and Certificates Of Interested Parties due by 1/4/2022. Signed by Judge Aileen M. Cannon on 12/2/2021. See attached document for full details. (kpe)
November 29, 2021 Filing 6 STATUS REPORT Removal by MNET Financial, Inc. (Philip-Spengler, Sangeeta)
November 10, 2021 Filing 5 Defendant's Certificate of Other Affiliates/Corporate Disclosure Statement by MNET Financial, Inc. identifying Corporate Parent Desert Shore Purchaser, Inc. for MNET Financial, Inc. (Philip-Spengler, Sangeeta)
November 9, 2021 Filing 4 Defenndant's ANSWER and Affirmative Defenses to Complaint re the Notice of Removal with Jury Demand by MNET Financial, Inc.. (Philip-Spengler, Sangeeta)
November 3, 2021 Filing 3 NOTICE OF COURT PRACTICES IN REMOVAL CASES. ( Status Report due by 11/29/2021.) Signed by Judge Aileen M. Cannon on 11/3/2021. See attached document for full details. (kpe)
November 2, 2021 Filing 2 Clerks Notice of Judge Assignment to Judge Aileen M. Cannon. Pursuant to 28 USC 636(c), the parties are hereby notified that the U.S. Magistrate Judge Bruce E. Reinhart is available to handle any or all proceedings in this case. If agreed, parties should complete and file the Consent form found on our website. It is not necessary to file a document indicating lack of consent. (kpe)
November 2, 2021 Filing 1 NOTICE OF REMOVAL (STATE COURT COMPLAINT - Complaint) Filing fee $ 402.00 receipt number AFLSDC-15142175, filed by MNET Financial, Inc.. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Docket Sheet, #3 Supplement State Court Complaint, #4 Supplement State Court Summons, #5 Supplement State Court Notice of Removal)(Golden, Dale) No answer/motion to dismiss filed. Modified on 11/2/2021 (kpe).

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Florida Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Sacks v. MNET Financial, Inc.
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Elsa Sacks
Represented By: Jibrael Jarallah Said Hindi
Represented By: Thomas John Patti, III
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: MNET Financial, Inc.
Represented By: Dale Thomas Golden
Represented By: Sangeeta G. Philip-Spengler
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?