Hayden v. Urvan
Matthew Hayden |
Steven F. Urvan |
9:2021cv82051 |
November 9, 2021 |
US District Court for the Southern District of Florida |
William Matthewman |
Rodney Smith |
Contract: Other |
28 U.S.C. ยง 1441 |
Plaintiff |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on November 22, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 17 ORDER Setting Discovery Procedure. Signed by Magistrate Judge William Matthewman on 12/16/2021. See attached document for full details. (ls) |
Filing 16 ORDER REFERRING CASE to Mediation. Mediation Deadline 7/1/2022. Signed by Judge Rodney Smith on 12/16/2021. See attached document for full details. (ls) |
Filing 15 SCHEDULING ORDER: ( Jury Trial set for 12/5/2022 before Judge Rodney Smith., Calendar Call set for 11/29/2022 09:00 AM before Judge Rodney Smith., Amended Pleadings due by 1/18/2022., Expert Discovery due by 6/6/2022., Fact Discovery due by 6/6/2022., Joinder of Parties due by 1/18/2022., Mediation Deadline 7/1/2022., In Limine Motions due by 11/10/2022., Dispositive Motions due by 7/11/2022., Motions due by 11/10/2022., Pretrial Stipulation due by 11/10/2022.), ORDER REFERRING CASE to Magistrate Judge William Matthewman for Pretrial Non-Dispositive Matters. Signed by Judge Rodney Smith on 12/16/2021. See attached document for full details. (ls) #Pattern Jury Instruction Builder - To access the latest, up to date changes to the 11th Circuit Pattern Jury Instructions go to https://pji.ca11.uscourts.gov or click here. |
Filing 14 PAPERLESS ORDER granting #9 Motion for Substitution of Counsel. Attorney Matthew Thomas Christ added. Signed by Judge Rodney Smith on 12/3/2021. (cbn) |
Filing 13 PAPERLESS ORDER granting #8 Motion for Substitution of Counsel. Attorney Fred Alan Cunningham added. Attorney Matthew Pearce McLauchlin representing Plaintiff terminated. Signed by Judge Rodney Smith on 12/3/2021. (cbn) |
Filing 12 CERTIFICATE of Counsel re Interested Persons by Matthew Thomas Christ on behalf of Matthew Hayden (Christ, Matthew) |
Filing 11 CERTIFICATE of Counsel re Interested Persons by Joanne M. O'Connor on behalf of Steven F. Urvan (O'Connor, Joanne) |
Filing 10 Joint SCHEDULING REPORT - Rule 16.1 by Steven F. Urvan (Attachments: #1 Text of Proposed Order PROPOSED SCHEDULING ORDER)(O'Connor, Joanne) |
Filing 9 Consent STIPULATED MOTION for Substitution of Counsel. Substituting Matthew Thomas Christ for Matthew Pearce McLauchlin by Matthew Hayden. Responses due by 12/13/2021 (Christ, Matthew) |
Filing 8 Consent STIPULATED MOTION for Substitution of Counsel. Substituting Fred Alan Cunningham for Matthew Pearce McLauchlin by Matthew Hayden. Responses due by 12/13/2021 (Cunningham, Fred) |
Filing 7 NOTICE of Attorney Appearance by Matthew Thomas Christ on behalf of Matthew Hayden. Attorney Matthew Thomas Christ added to party Matthew Hayden(pty:pla). (Christ, Matthew) |
Filing 6 NOTICE of Attorney Appearance by Fred Alan Cunningham on behalf of Matthew Hayden. Attorney Fred Alan Cunningham added to party Matthew Hayden(pty:pla). (Cunningham, Fred) |
Filing 5 Defendant's ANSWER and Affirmative Defenses to Complaint re the Notice of Removal by Steven F. Urvan. (O'Connor, Joanne) |
Filing 4 NOTICE of Attorney Appearance by Joanne M. O'Connor on behalf of Steven F. Urvan. Attorney Joanne M. O'Connor added to party Steven F. Urvan(pty:dft). (O'Connor, Joanne) |
Filing 3 ORDER REQUIRING JOINT SCHEDULING REPORT, CERTIFICATES OF INTERESTED PARTIES AND CORPORATE DISCLOSURE STATEMENTS - Deadlines by 12/3/2021 Signed by Judge Rodney Smith on 11/10/2021. See attached document for full details. (ail) |
Filing 2 Clerks Notice of Judge Assignment to Judge Rodney Smith. Pursuant to 28 USC 636(c), the parties are hereby notified that the U.S. Magistrate Judge William Matthewman is available to handle any or all proceedings in this case. If agreed, parties should complete and file the Consent form found on our website. It is not necessary to file a document indicating lack of consent. Pro se (NON-PRISONER) litigants may receive Notices of Electronic Filings (NEFS) via email after filing a Consent by Pro Se Litigant (NON-PRISONER) to Receive Notices of Electronic Filing. The consent form is available under the forms section of our website. (pes) |
Filing 1 NOTICE OF REMOVAL (STATE COURT COMPLAINT - Complaint) Filing fee $ 402.00 receipt number AFLSDC-15161772, filed by Steven F. Urvan. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A - Process, Pleadings and Orders, #2 Civil Cover Sheet)(Rothman, Steven) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Florida Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Search for this case: Hayden v. Urvan | |
---|---|
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Plaintiff: Matthew Hayden | |
Represented By: | Fred Alan Cunningham |
Represented By: | Matthew Thomas Christ |
Represented By: | Matthew Pearce McLauchlin |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Defendant: Steven F. Urvan | |
Represented By: | Steven Jeffrey Rothman |
Represented By: | Joanne M. O'Connor |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.