Cancel v. GlaxoSmithKline LLC et al
| Hugo Cancel |
| GlaxoSmithKline LLC, GlaxoSmithKline (America) Inc., GlaxoSmithKline plc, Pfizer Inc, Boehringer Ingelheim Pharmaceuticals, Inc, Boehringer Ingelheim Corporation, Boehringer Ingelheim USA Corporation, Sanofi-Aventis U.S. LLC, Sanofi US Services Inc., Patheon Manufacturing Services LLC and Chattem, Inc. |
| 9:2021cv82374 |
| December 16, 2021 |
| US District Court for the Southern District of Florida |
| Robin L Rosenberg |
| Personal Inj. Prod. Liability |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on December 28, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 4 MDL Tag-Along Case Receipt from Southern District of Florida. Case Number 9:21-cv-82374-RLR Cancel v. GlaxoSmithKline LLC et al with documents 1-3. Re: FLSD MDL Case Number 9:20-md-02924-RLR. Clerks Note: JPML notified (mc) |
| Cases associated 9:20-md-2924-RLR. (mc) |
Filing 3
ORDER OF CONSOLIDATION AND ADMINISTRATIVE CLOSE-OUT. Signed by Judge Robin L. Rosenberg on 12/17/2021. See attached document for full details. (mc)
|
| Filing 2 Judge Assignment to Judge Robin L. Rosenberg. (scn) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT Hugo Cancel against All Defendants. Filing fees $ 402.00 receipt number AFLSDC-15252241, filed by Hugo Cancel. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet)(Fischer, Marlo) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Florida Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
