Hulse v. Aucta Pharmaceuticals, Inc.
Plaintiff: R. Douglas Hulse
Defendant: Aucta Pharmaceuticals, Inc. and Aucta Pharmaceuticals, LLC
Case Number: 9:2021cv82493
Filed: December 17, 2021
Court: US District Court for the Southern District of Florida
Presiding Judge: Raag Singhal
Nature of Suit: Contract: Other
Cause of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Jury Demanded By: None
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on February 7, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
February 7, 2022 Filing 21 Defendant's MOTION to Dismiss for Lack of Jurisdiction #1 Complaint, 14 Order on Motion for Extension of Time to File Response/Reply/Answer by Aucta Pharmaceuticals, Inc.. Responses due by 2/22/2022 (Attachments: #1 Affidavit Ex 1- Declaration of Li)(Sharkey Ross, Amanda)
February 7, 2022 Filing 20 Second Certificate of Other Affiliates/Corporate Disclosure Statement by Aucta Pharmaceuticals, Inc. identifying Corporate Parent Shanghai Aucta Pharmaceuticals Co., Ltd. for Aucta Pharmaceuticals, Inc. (Sharkey Ross, Amanda)
January 27, 2022 Filing 19 Joint SCHEDULING REPORT - Rule 26(f) by R. Douglas Hulse (Evans, Dale)
January 21, 2022 Filing 18 Clerks Notice to Filer re #17 Certificate of Other Affiliates/Corporate Disclosure Statement. Other Affiliates/Corporate Parents Not Entered; ERROR - The Filer failed to enter all Other Affiliates/Corporate Parents from the Certificate of Other Affiliates/Corporate Disclosure Statement. Filer is instructed to refile their Certificate of Other Affiliates/Corporate Disclosure Statement and enter the missing Other Affiliates/Corp Parents, Shanghai Aucta Pharmaceuticals Co. Ltd.. Note - Other Affiliates/Corporate Parents do not appear on the docket sheet. (jas)
January 20, 2022 Filing 17 Defendant's Corporate Disclosure Statement by Aucta Pharmaceuticals, Inc. (Sharkey Ross, Amanda)
January 14, 2022 Filing 16 Clerks Notice to Filer re #15 Certificate of Other Affiliates/Corporate Disclosure Statement. Other Affiliates/Corporate Parents Not Entered; ERROR - The Filer failed to enter all Other Affiliates/Corporate Parents from the Certificate of Other Affiliates/Corporate Disclosure Statement. Filer is instructed to refile their Certificate of Other Affiliates/Corporate Disclosure Statement and enter the missing Other Affiliates/Corp Parents, the Sage Group, Inc.. Note - Other Affiliates/Corporate Parents do not appear on the docket sheet. (jas)
January 13, 2022 Filing 15 Defendant's Certificate of Other Affiliates/Corporate Disclosure Statement - NONE disclosed by Aucta Pharmaceuticals, Inc. (Sharkey Ross, Amanda)
January 7, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 14 PAPERLESS ORDER granting #11 Motion for Extension of Time to File Response/Answer to a Complaint or Other Case Initiating Document. Response/Answer due 2/7/2022. Signed by Judge Raag Singhal on 1/7/2022. (eca)
January 7, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 13 PAPERLESS ORDER granting #10 Motion to Appear Pro Hac Vice, Consent to Designation, and Request to Electronically Receive Notices of Electronic Filing for Attorney Christopher G. Karagheuzoff. Signed by Judge Raag Singhal on 1/7/2022. (eca)
January 6, 2022 Filing 12 NOTICE of Attorney Appearance by Amanda Jean Sharkey Ross on behalf of Aucta Pharmaceuticals, Inc. (Sharkey Ross, Amanda)
January 6, 2022 Filing 11 Agreed MOTION for Extension of Time to File Response/Reply/Answer as to #1 Complaint, by Aucta Pharmaceuticals, Inc.. (Sharkey Ross, Amanda)
January 6, 2022 Filing 10 Defendant's MOTION to Appear Pro Hac Vice, Consent to Designation, and Request to Electronically Receive Notices of Electronic Filing for Christopher G. Karagheuzoff. Filing Fee $ 200.00 Receipt # AFLSDC-15296009 by Aucta Pharmaceuticals, Inc.. Attorney Amanda Jean Sharkey Ross added to party Aucta Pharmaceuticals, Inc.(pty:dft). Responses due by 1/20/2022 (Attachments: #1 Certification Certification of Christopher Karagheuzoff, #2 Text of Proposed Order Order On Pro Hac Vice)(Sharkey Ross, Amanda)
December 23, 2021 Filing 9 Certificate of Other Affiliates/Corporate Disclosure Statement - NONE disclosed by R. Douglas Hulse (Cunningham, Thomas)
December 23, 2021 Filing 8 Clerks Notice to Filer re #7 Certificate of Service. Other Affiliates/Corporate Parents Not Entered; ERROR - The Filer failed to enter all Other Affiliates/Corporate Parents from the Certificate of Other Affiliates/Corporate Disclosure Statement. Filer is instructed to refile their Certificate of Other Affiliates/Corporate Disclosure Statement and enter the missing Other Affiliates/Corp Parents. Note - Other Affiliates/Corporate Parents do not appear on the docket sheet. (jas)
December 23, 2021 Filing 7 CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE by R. Douglas Hulse re 5 Order,,, Certificate of Interested Persons (Cunningham, Thomas)
December 17, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 6 Order Requiring Joint Scheduling Report and Certificates of Interested Parties. Signed by Judge Raag Singhal on 12/17/2021. See attached document for full details. (jas)
December 17, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 5 PAPERLESS ORDER TO FILE CERTIFICATE OF INTERESTED PERSONSWithin SEVEN (7) DAYS of entry of an appearance, each party, including governmental parties, must file certificates of interested parties and corporate disclosure statements that contain a complete list of persons, associated persons, firms, partnerships, or corporations that have a financial interest in the outcome of this case, including subsidiaries, conglomerates, affiliates, parent corporations, and other identifiable legal entities related to a party. The parties shall not include Judge Singhal or the paired magistrate judges as interested parties unless they have an interest in the litigation. Throughout the pendency of the action, the parties are under a continuing obligation to amend, correct, and update the certificates. Signed by Judge Raag Singhal on 12/17/2021. (eca)
December 17, 2021 Filing 4 NOTICE OF COURT PRACTICEUnless otherwise specified by the Court, every motion, legal memorandum, brief, and otherwise shall: be double-spaced, in justified alignment, in 12-point font, using either Times New Roman or Arial typeface. This Notice does not supplant the requirements and provisions of Local Rule 7.1(c). The Court cautions parties against excessive use of footnotes.Multiple Plaintiffs or Defendants shall file joint motions with co-parties unless there are clear conflicts of position. If conflicts of position exist, parties shall explain the conflicts in their separate motions.Parties are encouraged to seek extensions of time in a timely fashion. "A motion for extension of time is not self-executing; no motion is, unless expressly provided for by the applicable rule. Yet, by filing these motions on or near the last day, and then sitting idle pending the Court's disposition of the motion, parties essentially grant their own motion. The Court will not condone this." Compere v. Nusret Miami, LLC, 2020 WL 2844888, at *2 (S.D. Fla. May 7, 2020) (internal citations omitted).Local Rule 16.4, Local Rules for the United States District Court for the Southern District of Florida, requires that a Notice of Settlement "shall be filed and served jointly by counsel for all parties to the settlement." A unilateral notice of settlement will not stay pre-trial deadlines or hearings.Failure to comply with any of these procedures may result in the imposition of appropriate sanctions. Signed by Judge Raag Singhal on 12/17/2021. (eca)
December 17, 2021 Filing 3 Summons Issued as to Aucta Pharmaceuticals, Inc. (jbs)
December 17, 2021 Filing 2 Clerks Notice of Judge Assignment to Judge Raag Singhal. Pursuant to 28 USC 636(c), the parties are hereby notified that the U.S. Magistrate Judge William Matthewman is available to handle any or all proceedings in this case. If agreed, parties should complete and file the Consent form found on our website. It is not necessary to file a document indicating lack of consent. Pro se (NON-PRISONER) litigants may receive Notices of Electronic Filings (NEFS) via email after filing a Consent by Pro Se Litigant (NON-PRISONER) to Receive Notices of Electronic Filing. The consent form is available under the forms section of our website. (jbs)
December 17, 2021 Filing 1 COMPLAINT against Aucta Pharmaceuticals, Inc.. Filing fees $ 402.00 receipt number AFLSDC-15256690, filed by R. Douglas Hulse. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Summon(s) Summons, #3 Exhibit 1, #4 Exhibit 2, #5 Exhibit 3, #6 Exhibit 4, #7 Exhibit 5)(Cunningham, Thomas)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Florida Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Hulse v. Aucta Pharmaceuticals, Inc.
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Aucta Pharmaceuticals, Inc.
Represented By: Amanda Jean Sharkey Ross
Represented By: Christopher G. Karagheuzoff
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Aucta Pharmaceuticals, LLC
Represented By: Amanda Jean Sharkey Ross
Represented By: Christopher G. Karagheuzoff
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: R. Douglas Hulse
Represented By: Dale A Evans, Jr.
Represented By: Thomas Justin Cunningham
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?