Winshman et al v. Bright Mountain Media, Inc.
Plaintiff: Joey Winshman, Eli Desatnik and Nadav Slutzky
Defendant: Bright Mountain Media, Inc.
Case Number: 9:2021cv82503
Filed: December 17, 2021
Court: US District Court for the Southern District of Florida
Presiding Judge: Donald M Middlebrooks
Nature of Suit: Negotiable Instrument
Cause of Action: 28 U.S.C. ยง 1330
Jury Demanded By: None
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on February 1, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
February 1, 2022 Filing 12 Defendant's Certificate of Other Affiliates/Corporate Disclosure Statement - NONE disclosed by Bright Mountain Media, Inc. (Betensky, Gary)
January 24, 2022 Filing 11 Defendant's ANSWER and Affirmative Defenses to Complaint by Bright Mountain Media, Inc.. (Ingalls, Andrew)
January 12, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 10 PAPERLESS ORDER granting in part #9 Motion for Extension of Time. Defendant requests an extension of time to respond to the Complaint from January 12, 2022 until February 1, 2022. In support, Defendant represents that counsel was retained on January 10, 2022 and prior commitments prevent counsel from responding by the due date. Motions for extension of time must set forth good cause supported by specific facts. The motion does not explain why Defendant retained counsel just two days before its response deadline, and thus does not provide sufficient information from which the court can assess whether good cause exists. Nevertheless, given the date on which counsel was retained, and in light of Plaintiff's consent to the relief requested, I will grant the motion in part. Accordingly, Defendant must respond to the complaint on or by January 24, 2022. Signed by Judge Donald M. Middlebrooks on 1/12/2022. (kal)
January 11, 2022 Filing 9 Unopposed MOTION for Extension of Time time to respond to Complaint by Bright Mountain Media, Inc.. Attorney Andrew Robert Ingalls added to party Bright Mountain Media, Inc.(pty:dft). Responses due by 1/25/2022 (Attachments: #1 Text of Proposed Order)(Ingalls, Andrew)
December 23, 2021 Filing 8 SUMMONS (Affidavit) Returned Executed on #1 Complaint with a 21 day response/answer filing deadline pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 12 by Joey Winshman, Nadav Slutzky, Eli Desatnik. Bright Mountain Media, Inc. served on 12/22/2021, response/answer due 1/12/2022. (Cerenko, Marko)
December 20, 2021 Filing 7 Summons Issued as to Bright Mountain Media, Inc.. (jas)
December 17, 2021 Filing 6 NOTICE of Filing Proposed Summons(es) by Eli Desatnik, Nadav Slutzky, Joey Winshman (Cerenko, Marko)
December 17, 2021 Filing 5 NOTICE by Eli Desatnik, Nadav Slutzky, Joey Winshman re 4 Clerks Notice to Filer re: Electronic Case Civil Cover Sheet (Cerenko, Marko)
December 17, 2021 Filing 4 Clerks Notice to Filer re: Electronic Case. No Civil Cover Sheet. Filer is instructed to file a Notice (Other) with the Civil Cover Sheet attached within 24 hours of the notice. (mee)
December 17, 2021 Filing 3 Clerks Notice to Filer re: Electronic Case. Venue on the Civil Cover Sheet does not match the initiating document. The Clerks Office confirmed Palm Beach (Office - West Palm Beach) as the county with the filer. It is not necessary to re-file this document. (mee)
December 17, 2021 Filing 2 Clerks Notice of Judge Assignment to Judge Donald M. Middlebrooks. Pursuant to 28 USC 636(c), the parties are hereby notified that the U.S. Magistrate Judge William Matthewman is available to handle any or all proceedings in this case. If agreed, parties should complete and file the Consent form found on our website. It is not necessary to file a document indicating lack of consent. Pro se (NON-PRISONER) litigants may receive Notices of Electronic Filings (NEFS) via email after filing a Consent by Pro Se Litigant (NON-PRISONER) to Receive Notices of Electronic Filing. The consent form is available under the forms section of our website. (mee)
December 17, 2021 Filing 1 COMPLAINT against Bright Mountain Media, Inc.. Filing fees $ 402.00 receipt number AFLSDC-15257403, filed by Joey Winshman, Nadav Slutzky, Eli Desatnik.(Cerenko, Marko)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Florida Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Winshman et al v. Bright Mountain Media, Inc.
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Joey Winshman
Represented By: Jeremy Robert Kreines
Represented By: Marko Cerenko
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Eli Desatnik
Represented By: Jeremy Robert Kreines
Represented By: Marko Cerenko
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Nadav Slutzky
Represented By: Jeremy Robert Kreines
Represented By: Marko Cerenko
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Bright Mountain Media, Inc.
Represented By: Andrew Robert Ingalls
Represented By: Gary Steven Betensky
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?