Joseph v. Ballou et al
| Emmanuel Joseph |
| Ballou, Art, CJ, Fose and Cooper |
| 9:2022cv80137 |
| January 27, 2022 |
| US District Court for the Southern District of Florida |
| Roy K Altman |
| Rodolfo A Ruiz |
| Habeas Corpus (Prison Condition) |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 State Prisoner Civil Rights |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on March 9, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 5
ORDER CONSOLIDATING CASES. Case Number 22-cv-80137-RAR is hereby CONSOLIDATED into Case Number 22-cv-80089-RAR. All future filings shall be made under Joseph v. Bryant, et al., No. 22-cv-80089-RAR. Signed by Judge Rodolfo A. Ruiz, II on 3/9/2022. See attached document for full details. Associated Cases: 9:22-cv-80089-RAR, 9:22-cv-80137-RAR (cds)
|
| Civil Case Terminated. Closing Case. PER DE#5 (cds) |
| Cases associated. (cds) |
|
Filing 4
ORDER OF TRANSFER to Judge Rodolfo A. Ruiz, II for all further proceedings, accepted and signed on 02/17/2022. Judge Roy K. Altman no longer assigned to case. Signed by Judge Roy K. Altman on 2/17/2022. See attached document for full details. (cds)
|
| Filing 3 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis by Emmanuel Joseph. (daa) |
| Filing 2 Judge Assignment to Judge Roy K. Altman. (daa) |
| Filing 1 Complaint pursuant to 42 USC 1983 against Art, Ballou, CJ, Cooper, Fose. Filing fee $ 402.00. IFP Filed, filed by Emmanuel Joseph.(daa) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Florida Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
