McCrackin v. Credit Control, LLC
Ashley McCrackin |
Credit Control, LLC |
9:2022cv80358 |
March 8, 2022 |
US District Court for the Southern District of Florida |
Rodney Smith |
Consumer Credit |
15 U.S.C. ยง 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act |
Both |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on April 12, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 8 ORDER STAYING AND ADMINISTRATIVELY CLOSING CASE Motions terminated: #5 Unopposed MOTION to Stay filed by Credit Control, LLC. Signed by Judge Rodney Smith on 4/12/2022. See attached document for full details. (pcs) |
Filing 7 PAPERLESS ORDER denying as moot #6 Motion for Extension of Time to File Response/Reply/Answer. Signed by Judge Rodney Smith on 4/12/2022. (tcl) |
Filing 6 Unopposed MOTION for Extension of Time to File Response/Reply/Answer to Complaint by Credit Control, LLC. (Philip-Spengler, Sangeeta) |
Filing 5 Unopposed MOTION to Stay by Credit Control, LLC. Responses due by 3/28/2022 (Philip-Spengler, Sangeeta) |
Filing 4 ORDER REQUIRING JOINT SCHEDULING REPORT, CERTIFICATES OF INTERESTED PARTIES AND CORPORATE DISCLOSURE STATEMENTS. Joint Scheduling Report due by 4/2/2022. Signed by Judge Rodney Smith on 3/10/2022. See attached document for full details. (amb) |
Filing 3 Defendant's Corporate Disclosure Statement by Credit Control, LLC identifying Corporate Parent Credit Control Holdings, Inc. for Credit Control, LLC (Philip-Spengler, Sangeeta) |
Filing 2 Clerks Notice of Judge Assignment to Judge Rodney Smith. Pursuant to 28 USC 636(c), the parties are hereby notified that the U.S. Magistrate Judge Shaniek M. Maynard is available to handle any or all proceedings in this case. If agreed, parties should complete and file the Consent form found on our website. It is not necessary to file a document indicating lack of consent. Pro se (NON-PRISONER) litigants may receive Notices of Electronic Filings (NEFS) via email after filing a Consent by Pro Se Litigant (NON-PRISONER) to Receive Notices of Electronic Filing. The consent form is available under the forms section of our website. (bb) |
Filing 1 NOTICE OF REMOVAL (STATE COURT COMPLAINT - Complaint) Filing fee $ 402.00 receipt number AFLSDC-15456314, filed by Credit Control, LLC. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Docket Sheet, #3 Summon(s) State Court Summons, #4 Supplement State Court Complaint, #5 Supplement State Court Notice of Removal)(Golden, Dale) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Florida Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Search for this case: McCrackin v. Credit Control, LLC | |
---|---|
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Plaintiff: Ashley McCrackin | |
Represented By: | Jibrael Jarallah Said Hindi |
Represented By: | Thomas John Patti, III |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Defendant: Credit Control, LLC | |
Represented By: | Dale Thomas Golden |
Represented By: | Sangeeta G. Philip-Spengler |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.