Wolfe v. Sanofi SA et al
David Robert Wolfe |
Sanofi SA, Sanofi US Services, Inc., Sanofi-Aventis US LLC, Boehringer Ingelheim Pharmaceuticals, Inc., Chattem, Inc. and GlaxoSmithKline, LLC |
9:2022cv80427 |
March 17, 2022 |
US District Court for the Southern District of Florida |
Bruce E Reinhart |
Robin L Rosenberg |
Personal Injury: Health Care/Pharmaceutical Personal Injury Product Liability |
28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 Diversity-Product Liability |
Plaintiff |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on March 25, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 3 ORDER of Consolidation and Administrative Close-Out. Closing Case for Administrative Purposes Only. Signed by Judge Robin L. Rosenberg on 3/25/2022. See attached document for full details. (pes) |
Filing 2 Clerks Notice of Judge Assignment to Judge Robin L. Rosenberg and Magistrate Judge Bruce E. Reinhart. Pro se (NON-PRISONER) litigants may receive Notices of Electronic Filings (NEFS) via email after filing a Consent by Pro Se Litigant (NON-PRISONER) to Receive Notices of Electronic Filing. The consent form is available under the forms section of our website. (bb) |
Filing 1 COMPLAINT against Boehringer Ingelheim Pharmaceuticals, Inc., Chattem, Inc., GlaxoSmithKline, LLC, Sanofi SA, Sanofi US Services, Inc., Sanofi-Aventis US LLC. Filing fees $ 402.00 receipt number AFLSDC-15485533, filed by David Robert Wolfe. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet Civil Cover Sheet)(Carlson, Craig) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Florida Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.