Cohan v. Duffy's of Jupiter, Inc. et al
| Howard Cohan |
| Duffy's of Jupiter, Inc., Duffy's of Jupiter West, Inc., Duffy's of Port St. Lucie West, Inc. and Duffy's of Waterford Lakes, Inc. |
| 9:2022cv80437 |
| March 18, 2022 |
| US District Court for the Southern District of Florida |
| Rodney Smith |
| Civil Rights: Americans with Disabilities - Other |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 12182 Americans with Disabilities Act |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on May 12, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 10 STIPULATION of Dismissal With Prejudice (Jointly Filed) by Duffy's of Jupiter West, Inc., Duffy's of Jupiter, Inc., Duffy's of Port St. Lucie West, Inc., Duffy's of Waterford Lakes, Inc. (Cruz, Edwin) |
| Filing 9 NOTICE OF COURT PRACTICE ON NOTICE OF SETTLEMENT. Closing Case. Signed by Judge Rodney Smith on 4/12/2022. See attached document for full details. (mee) |
| Filing 8 NOTICE of Settlement (filed Jointly) by Duffy's of Jupiter West, Inc., Duffy's of Jupiter, Inc., Duffy's of Port St. Lucie West, Inc., Duffy's of Waterford Lakes, Inc.. Attorney Edwin Cruz added to party Duffy's of Jupiter West, Inc.(pty:dft), Attorney Edwin Cruz added to party Duffy's of Jupiter, Inc.(pty:dft), Attorney Edwin Cruz added to party Duffy's of Port St. Lucie West, Inc.(pty:dft), Attorney Edwin Cruz added to party Duffy's of Waterford Lakes, Inc.(pty:dft). (Cruz, Edwin) |
| Filing 7 SUMMONS (Affidavit) Returned Executed on #1 Complaint with a 21 day response/answer filing deadline pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 12 by Howard Cohan. Duffy's of Jupiter West, Inc. served on 3/23/2022, response/answer due 4/13/2022. (Sconzo, Gregory) |
| Filing 6 SUMMONS (Affidavit) Returned Executed on #1 Complaint with a 21 day response/answer filing deadline pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 12 by Howard Cohan. Duffy's of Waterford Lakes, Inc. served on 3/23/2022, response/answer due 4/13/2022. (Sconzo, Gregory) |
| Filing 5 SUMMONS (Affidavit) Returned Executed on #1 Complaint with a 21 day response/answer filing deadline pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 12 by Howard Cohan. Duffy's of Port St. Lucie West, Inc. served on 3/23/2022, response/answer due 4/13/2022. (Sconzo, Gregory) |
| Filing 4 SUMMONS (Affidavit) Returned Executed on #1 Complaint with a 21 day response/answer filing deadline pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 12 by Howard Cohan. Duffy's of Jupiter, Inc. served on 3/23/2022, response/answer due 4/13/2022. (Sconzo, Gregory) |
| Filing 3 Summons Issued as to Duffy's of Jupiter West, Inc., Duffy's of Jupiter, Inc., Duffy's of Port St. Lucie West, Inc., Duffy's of Waterford Lakes, Inc.. (mee) |
| Filing 2 Clerks Notice of Judge Assignment to Judge Rodney Smith. Pursuant to 28 USC 636(c), the parties are hereby notified that the U.S. Magistrate Judge Shaniek M. Maynard is available to handle any or all proceedings in this case. If agreed, parties should complete and file the Consent form found on our website. It is not necessary to file a document indicating lack of consent. Pro se (NON-PRISONER) litigants may receive Notices of Electronic Filings (NEFS) via email after filing a Consent by Pro Se Litigant (NON-PRISONER) to Receive Notices of Electronic Filing. The consent form is available under the forms section of our website. (mee) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against All Defendants. Filing fees $ 402.00 receipt number AFLSDC-15489136, filed by Howard Cohan. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Summon(s), #3 Summon(s), #4 Summon(s), #5 Summon(s))(Sconzo, Gregory) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Florida Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
