Campbell v. ECHOSPHERE L.L.C.
| Donald Campbell |
| ECHOSPHERE L.L.C. doing business as DISH NETWORK and ECHOSPHERE L.L.C. a Foreign Limited Liability Company doing business as DISH NETWORK |
| 9:2022cv80469 |
| March 24, 2022 |
| US District Court for the Southern District of Florida |
| West Palm Beach Office |
| Rodolfo A Ruiz |
| Labor: Family and Medical Leave Act |
| 29 U.S.C. ยง 2611 Family Medical Leave Act |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on April 29, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 12
ORDER GRANTING JOINT MOTION TO STAY CASE AND COMPEL ARBITRATION. Signed by Judge Rodolfo A. Ruiz, II on 4/29/2022. See attached document for full details. (ob)
|
| Filing 11 Clerks Notice to Filer re #10 Stipulation. Wrong Event Selected - Document is a Motion; ERROR - The Filer selected the wrong event. A motion event must always be selected when filing a motion. The correction was made by the Clerk. It is not necessary to refile this document. (cqs) |
| Filing 10 STIPULATED MOTION TO STAY CASE AND COMPEL ARBITRATION (JOINT) by ECHOSPHERE L.L.C. (Attachments: #1 Text of Proposed Order)(Schwartz, Jennifer)Event and Text Modified on 4/29/2022 (cqs). |
| Filing 9 NOTICE of Attorney Appearance by Jennifer A. Schwartz on behalf of ECHOSPHERE L.L.C.. Attorney Jennifer A. Schwartz added to party ECHOSPHERE L.L.C.(pty:dft). (Schwartz, Jennifer) |
| Reset Response/Answer Due Deadline: ECHOSPHERE L.L.C. response/answer due 5/2/2022. PER DE# 8 (cds) |
|
Filing 8
PAPERLESS ORDER Granting Defendant's Unopposed Motion for Extension of Time, ECF No. #7 . Defendant shall respond to Plaintiff's Complaint on or before May 2, 2022. Signed by Judge Rodolfo A. Ruiz, II on 4/18/2022. (jb)
|
| Filing 7 Unopposed MOTION for Extension of Time to File Response/Reply/Answer as to #1 Complaint by ECHOSPHERE L.L.C.. Attorney Leslie Lagomasino Baum added to party ECHOSPHERE L.L.C.(pty:dft). (Attachments: #1 Text of Proposed Order)(Baum, Leslie) |
| Filing 6 Notice of NO Pending, Refiled, Related or Similar Actions by Donald Campbell (Storch, Noah) |
| Filing 5 Certificate of Other Affiliates/Corporate Disclosure Statement - NONE disclosed by Donald Campbell (Storch, Noah) |
| Filing 4 SUMMONS (Affidavit) Returned Executed on #1 Complaint with a 21 day response/answer filing deadline pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 12 by Donald Campbell. ECHOSPHERE L.L.C. served on 3/28/2022, response/answer due 4/18/2022. (Storch, Noah) |
| Filing 3 Summons Issued as to ECHOSPHERE L.L.C.. (cds) |
| Filing 2 Clerks Notice of Judge Assignment to Judge Rodolfo A. Ruiz, II. Pursuant to 28 USC 636(c), the parties are hereby notified that the U.S. Magistrate Judge Shaniek M. Maynard is available to handle any or all proceedings in this case. If agreed, parties should complete and file the Consent form found on our website. It is not necessary to file a document indicating lack of consent. Pro se (NON-PRISONER) litigants may receive Notices of Electronic Filings (NEFS) via email after filing a Consent by Pro Se Litigant (NON-PRISONER) to Receive Notices of Electronic Filing. The consent form is available under the forms section of our website. (cds) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT and Demand for Jury Trial against ECHOSPHERE L.L.C.. Filing fees $ 402.00 receipt number AFLSDC-15504804, filed by Donald Campbell. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Summon(s))(Storch, Noah) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Florida Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
