Klayman v. Porter et al
| Larry Klayman |
| Julia Porter, Hamilton Fox, III and Matthew Kaiser |
| 9:2022cv80642 |
| April 25, 2022 |
| U.S. District Court for the Southern District of Florida |
| Raag Singhal |
| Civil Rights: Other |
| 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Notice of Removal |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on June 7, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 16 RESPONSE in Opposition re 13 MOTION for Sanctions filed by Hamilton Fox, III, Matthew Kaiser, Julia Porter. Replies due by 6/14/2022. (Attachments: #1 Text of Proposed Order)(Rafkin, Brian) |
| Filing 15 REPLY to Response to Motion re #11 MOTION to Strike #10 MOTION to Remand to State Court Defendants' Motion to Strike Plaintiff's Motion to Remand filed by Hamilton Fox, III, Matthew Kaiser, Julia Porter. (Attachments: #1 Text of Proposed Order)(Rafkin, Brian) |
| Filing 14 Clerks Notice to Filer re #12 Response in Opposition to Motion Two or More Document Events Filed as One; ERROR - Only one event was selected by the Filer but more than one event was applicable to the document filed. The docket entry was corrected by the Clerk. It is not necessary to refile this document but in the future, the Filer must select all applicable events. See 13 MOTION for Sanctions. (ebz) |
| Filing 13 Cross MOTION for Sanctions by Larry Klayman. See DE #12 for image. (ebz) |
| Filing 12 RESPONSE in Opposition re #11 MOTION to Strike #10 MOTION to Remand to State Court Defendants' Motion to Strike Plaintiff's Motion to Remand filed by Larry Klayman. Replies due by 6/7/2022. (Klayman, Larry) |
| Filing 11 MOTION to Strike #10 MOTION to Remand to State Court Defendants' Motion to Strike Plaintiff's Motion to Remand by Hamilton Fox, III, Matthew Kaiser, Julia Porter. Responses due by 6/14/2022 (Attachments: #1 Text of Proposed Order)(Rafkin, Brian) |
| Filing 10 MOTION to Remand to State Court by Larry Klayman. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit)(Klayman, Larry) |
| Filing 9 NOTICE by Larry Klayman Notice of Conflict of Interest (Klayman, Larry) |
| Filing 8 NOTICE OF COURT PRACTICEUnless otherwise specified by the Court, every motion, legal memorandum, brief, and otherwise shall: be double-spaced, in justified alignment, in 12-point font, using either Times New Roman or Arial typeface. This Notice does not supplant the requirements and provisions of Local Rule 7.1(c). The Court cautions parties against excessive use of footnotes.Multiple Plaintiffs or Defendants shall file joint motions with co-parties unless there are clear conflicts of position. If conflicts of position exist, parties shall explain the conflicts in their separate motions.Parties are encouraged to seek extensions of time in a timely fashion. "A motion for extension of time is not self-executing; no motion is, unless expressly provided for by the applicable rule. Yet, by filing these motions on or near the last day, and then sitting idle pending the Court's disposition of the motion, parties essentially grant their own motion. The Court will not condone this." Compere v. Nusret Miami, LLC, 2020 WL 2844888, at *2 (S.D. Fla. May 7, 2020) (internal citations omitted).Exhibits to pleadings and motions shall be docketed in accordance with the Courts CM/ECF procedures, Rule 3L.(2): (2) Describing an Attachment to a Docket EntryA party filing an attachment to a document shall select one of the prescribed attachment categories from the drop-down menu (e.g., affidavit, transcript), provide an alphabetical or numerical designation (e.g., Exhibit A, Exhibit 1), and descriptively name each attachment (e.g., Exhibit 1 - Affidavit of Boo Radley) in a manner that enables the Court to easily locate and distinguish attachments. (Emphasis added.) Local Rule 16.4, Local Rules for the United States District Court for the Southern District of Florida, requires that a Notice of Settlement "shall be filed and served jointly by counsel for all parties to the settlement." A unilateral notice of settlement will not stay pre-trial deadlines or hearings.Failure to comply with any of these procedures may result in the imposition of appropriate sanctions. Signed by Judge Raag Singhal on 5/14/2022. (pb00) |
Filing 7
ORDER OF TRANSFER to Judge Raag Singhal for all further proceedings, accepted and signed on 5/13/2022. Judge Donald M. Middlebrooks no longer assigned to case. Signed by Judge Donald M. Middlebrooks on 5/10/2022. See attached document for full details. (ebz)
|
| Filing 6 NOTICE by Larry Klayman re #5 MOTION to Dismiss the State Court Complaint contained within the Notice of Removal with Prejudice #1 Notice of Removal (State Court Complaint),,,, , #4 MOTION to Consolidate Cases NOTICE OF INTENT TO FILE MOTION TO REMAND AND MOTION TO STAY DEFENDANTS MOTION TO DISMISS AND MOTION TO CONSOLIDATE. Attorney Larry Elliot Klayman added to party Larry Klayman(pty:pla). (Klayman, Larry) |
| Filing 5 MOTION to Dismiss the State Court Complaint contained within the Notice of Removal with Prejudice #1 Notice of Removal (State Court Complaint),,,, by Hamilton Fox, III, Matthew Kaiser, Julia Porter. Responses due by 5/10/2022 (Attachments: #1 Exhibit 1, #2 Exhibit 2, #3 Exhibit 3, #4 Exhibit 4, #5 Exhibit 5, #6 Exhibit 6, #7 Exhibit 7, #8 Exhibit 8, #9 Exhibit 9, #10 Exhibit 10, #11 Exhibit 11, #12 Exhibit 12)(Rafkin, Brian) |
| Filing 4 MOTION to Consolidate Cases by Hamilton Fox, III, Matthew Kaiser, Julia Porter. Responses due by 5/10/2022 (Attachments: #1 Text of Proposed Order, #2 Exhibit 1, #3 Exhibit 2, #4 Exhibit 3)(Rafkin, Brian) |
| Filing 3 Clerks Notice to Filer re: Electronic Case. Incorrect case opening information. The Filer selected the incorrect Jury demand when filing. The correction was made. It is not necessary to re-file this document. (nan) |
| Filing 2 Clerks Notice of Judge Assignment to Judge Donald M. Middlebrooks. Pursuant to 28 USC 636(c), the parties are hereby notified that the U.S. Magistrate Judge William Matthewman is available to handle any or all proceedings in this case. If agreed, parties should complete and file the Consent form found on our website. It is not necessary to file a document indicating lack of consent. (nan) |
| Filing 1 NOTICE OF REMOVAL (STATE COURT COMPLAINT - Larry Klayman v. Julia Porter, et al) Filing fee $ 402.00 receipt number AFLSDC-15588034, filed by Matthew Kaiser, Hamilton Fox, III, Julia Porter. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet, #2 State Court Complaint-Exhibit 1, #3 State Court Complaint-Exhibit 2, #4 U.S. District Court Order (Southern District of Florida)-Exhibit 3, #5 U.S. District Court Complaint (Northern District of California)-Exhibit 4, #6 U.S. District Court Complaint (Northern District of Texas)-Exhibit 5, #7 U.S. District Court Complaint (Western District of Texas)-Exhibit 6, #8 State Court Complaint & State Court Documents -Exhibit 7, #9 State Court Complaint & State Court Documents -Exhibit 8, #10 State Court Complaint & State Court Documents -Exhibit 9, #11 State Court Documents-Exhibit 10, #12 U.S. District Court Order (Southern District of Florida)-Exhibit 11, No Answer/Motion to Dismiss filed )(Rafkin, Brian) Modified Attachment Descriptions on 4/26/2022 (nan). |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the U.S. Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Florida Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
