Graff v. Village of Palm Springs et al
Plaintiff: Heather Graff
Defendant: Village of Palm Springs and Robert Hite
Case Number: 9:2022cv80688
Filed: May 3, 2022
Court: U.S. District Court for the Southern District of Florida
Presiding Judge: Aileen M Cannon
Nature of Suit: Civil Rights: Jobs
Cause of Action: 42 U.S.C. ยง 2000 Job Discrimination (Sex)
Jury Demanded By: Plaintiff
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on July 1, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
July 1, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 17 PAPERLESS ORDER granting #16 Defendants' Unopposed Motion for Extension of time to File Reply in Support of Motion to Dismiss Amended Complaint. Defendants shall file their reply on or before July 15, 2022. Signed by Judge Aileen M. Cannon on 7/1/2022. (jrt)
June 30, 2022 Filing 16 Unopposed MOTION for Extension of Time to File Response/Reply/Answer as to #15 Response in Opposition to Motion, by Robert Hite, Village of Palm Springs. (Railey, Jonathan)
June 28, 2022 Filing 15 RESPONSE in Opposition re #14 Joint MOTION TO DISMISS #12 Amended Complaint/Amended Notice of Removal FOR FAILURE TO STATE A CLAIM and to strike request for punitive damages and memorandum of law filed by Heather Graff. Replies due by 7/5/2022. (Copeland, Christopher)
June 16, 2022 Filing 14 Joint MOTION TO DISMISS #12 Amended Complaint/Amended Notice of Removal FOR FAILURE TO STATE A CLAIM and to strike request for punitive damages by Robert Hite, Village of Palm Springs. Responses due by 6/30/2022 (Railey, Jonathan)
June 4, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 13 PAPERLESS ORDER: In light of the filing of an Amended Complaint #12 , Defendant's Motion to Dismiss Plaintiff's Complaint #11 is DENIED AS MOOT. Signed by Judge Aileen M. Cannon on 6/4/2022. (jrt)
June 2, 2022 Filing 12 AMENDED COMPLAINT against All Defendants, filed by Heather Graff.(Copeland, Christopher)
May 31, 2022 Filing 11 Defendant's MOTION TO DISMISS #1 Complaint FOR FAILURE TO STATE A CLAIM by Robert Hite. Responses due by 6/14/2022 (Anderson, Kevin)
May 31, 2022 Filing 10 NOTICE of Attorney Appearance by Kevin Ramon Anderson on behalf of Robert Hite. Attorney Kevin Ramon Anderson added to party Robert Hite(pty:dft). (Anderson, Kevin)
May 26, 2022 Filing 9 NOTICE of Attorney Appearance by Jonathan Howard Railey on behalf of Village of Palm Springs. Attorney Jonathan Howard Railey added to party Village of Palm Springs(pty:dft). (Railey, Jonathan)
May 26, 2022 Filing 8 NOTICE of Attorney Appearance by Christopher J. Stearns, Jr on behalf of Village of Palm Springs. Attorney Christopher J. Stearns, Jr added to party Village of Palm Springs(pty:dft). (Stearns, Christopher)
May 20, 2022 Filing 7 NOTICE by Heather Graff of service of DE#4 on defendants (Copeland, Christopher)
May 20, 2022 Filing 6 SUMMONS (Affidavit) Returned Executed on #1 Complaint with a 21 day response/answer filing deadline pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 12 by Heather Graff. Robert Hite served on 5/10/2022, response/answer due 5/31/2022. (Copeland, Christopher)
May 20, 2022 Filing 5 SUMMONS (Affidavit) Returned Executed on #1 Complaint with a 21 day response/answer filing deadline pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 12 by Heather Graff. Village of Palm Springs served on 5/13/2022, response/answer due 6/3/2022. (Copeland, Christopher)
May 6, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 4 ORDER REQUIRING COMBINED RESPONSES. Signed by Judge Aileen M. Cannon on 5/6/2022. See attached document for full details. (cds)
May 3, 2022 Filing 3 Summons Issued as to Robert Hite, Village of Palm Springs. (cds)
May 3, 2022 Filing 2 Clerks Notice of Judge Assignment to Judge Aileen M. Cannon. Pursuant to 28 USC 636(c), the parties are hereby notified that the U.S. Magistrate Judge Bruce E. Reinhart is available to handle any or all proceedings in this case. If agreed, parties should complete and file the Consent form found on our website. It is not necessary to file a document indicating lack of consent. Pro se (NON-PRISONER) litigants may receive Notices of Electronic Filings (NEFS) via email after filing a Consent by Pro Se Litigant (NON-PRISONER) to Receive Notices of Electronic Filing. The consent form is available under the forms section of our website. (cds)
May 3, 2022 Filing 1 COMPLAINT and Demand for Jury Trial against All Defendants. Filing fees $ 402.00 receipt number AFLSDC-15608847, filed by Heather Graff. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Summon(s), #3 Summon(s))(Copeland, Christopher)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the U.S. Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Florida Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Graff v. Village of Palm Springs et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Heather Graff
Represented By: Christopher Charles Copeland
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Village of Palm Springs
Represented By: Christopher J. Stearns, Jr.
Represented By: Jonathan Howard Railey
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Robert Hite
Represented By: Kevin Ramon Anderson
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?