Newell v. Perpay, Inc.
Plaintiff: Bradley Newell
Defendant: Perpay, Inc.
Case Number: 9:2022cv80792
Filed: May 27, 2022
Court: US District Court for the Southern District of Florida
Presiding Judge: Aileen M Cannon
Nature of Suit: Other Statutory Actions
Cause of Action: 28 U.S.C. ยง 1441 Notice of Removal
Jury Demanded By: Plaintiff
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on July 14, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
July 14, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 15 ORDER CLOSING CASE. The Clerk of Court shall CLOSE this case. Signed by Judge Aileen M. Cannon on 7/14/2022. See attached document for full details. (ebz)
July 13, 2022 Filing 14 NOTICE of Voluntary Dismissal Without Prejudice by Bradley Newell (Shamis, Andrew)
July 1, 2022 Filing 13 STATUS REPORT Defendant's Removal Status Report by Perpay, Inc. (Mena, Daniel)
July 1, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 12 PAPERLESS ORDER granting in part and denying in part #11 Defendant's Unopposed Motion for Extension of Time to Respond to the Complaint. Defendant shall answer or respond to the complaint [1-2] on or before July 18, 2022. Signed by Judge Aileen M. Cannon on 7/1/2022. (dsy)
July 1, 2022 Set/Reset Response/Answer Due Deadline: Perpay, Inc. response/answer due 7/18/2022. Per DE 12 Order. (ebz)
June 30, 2022 Filing 11 Unopposed MOTION for Extension of Time to File Response/Reply/Answer by Perpay, Inc.. (Attachments: #1 Text of Proposed Order)(Mena, Daniel)
June 2, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 10 PAPERLESS ORDER granting #6 Defendant's Unopposed Motion for Extension of Time to Respond to the Complaint. Defendant shall answer or respond to the complaint [1-2] on or before July 5, 2022. Moving forward, any requests for extension must be filed sufficiently in advance of the deadline at issue. Signed by Judge Aileen M. Cannon on 6/2/2022. (dsy)
June 2, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 9 PAPERLESS ORDER granting #5 #7 the Motions to Appear Pro Hac Vice, Consents to Designation, and Requests to Electronically Receive Notices of Electronic Filing for Attorneys Meredith C. Slawe and Mayra Aguilera. The Court reserves the power to withdraw permission for special appearance prior to and during the time of trial. Failure to abide by any Court order or failure to appear at any scheduled matter may result in immediate revocation of counsels' pro hac vice status. Local counsel must be ready to adequately represent the party at any time, including conducting the actual trial. Signed by Judge Aileen M. Cannon on 6/2/2022. (dsy)
June 2, 2022 Filing 8 NOTICE OF COURT PRACTICES IN REMOVAL CASES. (Status Report due by 7/5/2022) Signed by Judge Aileen M. Cannon on 6/2/2022. See attached document for full details. (ebz)
June 2, 2022 Set/Reset Response/Answer Due Deadline: Perpay, Inc. response/answer due 7/5/2022. Per DE 10 Order. (ebz)
June 1, 2022 Filing 7 MOTION to Appear Pro Hac Vice, Consent to Designation, and Request to Electronically Receive Notices of Electronic Filing for Mayra Aguilera, Esq. Filing Fee $ 200.00 Receipt # AFLSDC-15681659 by Perpay, Inc.. Responses due by 6/15/2022 (Attachments: #1 Text of Proposed Order)(Mena, Daniel)
June 1, 2022 Filing 6 Unopposed MOTION for Extension of Time to File Response/Reply/Answer to Plaintiff's Complaint by Perpay, Inc.. (Attachments: #1 Text of Proposed Order)(Mena, Daniel)
May 31, 2022 Filing 5 MOTION to Appear Pro Hac Vice, Consent to Designation, and Request to Electronically Receive Notices of Electronic Filing for Meredith C. Slawe, Esq.. Filing Fee $ 200.00 Receipt # AFLSDC-15679631 by Perpay, Inc.. Responses due by 6/14/2022 (Attachments: #1 Text of Proposed Order)(Mena, Daniel)
May 31, 2022 Filing 4 Defendant's Corporate Disclosure Statement by Perpay, Inc. (Mena, Daniel)
May 31, 2022 Filing 3 Bar Letter re: Admissions sent to attorneys Meredith C. Slawe, Michael W. McTigue, Jr. and Mayra Aguilera, mailing date May 31, 2022. (cw)
May 27, 2022 Filing 2 Clerks Notice of Judge Assignment to Judge Aileen M. Cannon. Pursuant to 28 USC 636(c), the parties are hereby notified that the U.S. Magistrate Judge Bruce E. Reinhart is available to handle any or all proceedings in this case. If agreed, parties should complete and file the Consent form found on our website. It is not necessary to file a document indicating lack of consent. (nan)
May 27, 2022 Filing 1 NOTICE OF REMOVAL (STATE COURT COMPLAINT - Class Action Complaint) Filing fee $ 402.00 receipt number AFLSDC-15673886, filed by Perpay, Inc.. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Exhibit State Court Pleadings, No Answer/Motion to Dismiss filed.)(Mena, Daniel) Modified Attachment Descriptions on 5/31/2022 (nan).

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Florida Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Newell v. Perpay, Inc.
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Perpay, Inc.
Represented By: Daniel Oswaldo Mena
Represented By: Martha Rosa Mora
Represented By: Mayra Aguilera
Represented By: Meredith C. Slawe
Represented By: Michael W. McTigue, Jr.
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Bradley Newell
Represented By: Andrew John Shamis
Represented By: Christopher Chagas Gold
Represented By: Garrett O. Berg
Represented By: Scott Adam Edelsberg
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?