Affordable Aerial Photography, Inc. v. Str8 Real Estate Company et al
Affordable Aerial Photography, Inc. |
Str8 Real Estate Company and Anthony L. Pizzarelli |
9:2022cv80852 |
June 9, 2022 |
US District Court for the Southern District of Florida |
Aileen M Cannon |
Copyright |
17 U.S.C. ยง 0101 Copyright Infringement |
Plaintiff |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on August 5, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 13 ORDER STRIKING #9 Answer to Complaint filed by Anthony L. Pizzarelli, #10 Motion to Dismiss filed by Anthony L. Pizzarelli ; Denying #10 MOTION to Dismiss with Prejudice #1 Complaint, filed by Anthony L. Pizzarelli. ( Deadline to obtain new counsel 8/26/2022.), Anthony L. Pizzarelli response/answer due 9/12/2022; Str8 Real Estate Company response/answer due 9/12/2022. Signed by Judge Aileen M. Cannon on 8/5/2022. See attached document for full details. (ls) |
Filing 12 Certificate of Other Affiliates/Corporate Disclosure Statement - NONE disclosed by Affordable Aerial Photography, Inc. (DeSouza, Daniel) |
Filing 11 RESPONSE in Opposition re #10 MOTION to Dismiss with Prejudice #1 Complaint, filed by Affordable Aerial Photography, Inc.. Replies due by 8/1/2022. (DeSouza, Daniel) |
Filing 10 MOTION to Dismiss with Prejudice #1 Complaint, by Anthony L. Pizzarelli. Responses due by 8/5/2022 (ebz) |
Filing 9 ANSWER to Complaint by Anthony L. Pizzarelli. (Address Updated) (ebz) |
Filing 8 SUMMONS (Affidavit) Returned Executed on #1 Complaint, with a 21 day response/answer filing deadline pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 12 by Affordable Aerial Photography, Inc.. Anthony L. Pizzarelli served on 7/4/2022, response/answer due 7/25/2022. (DeSouza, Daniel) |
Filing 7 SUMMONS (Affidavit) Returned Executed on #1 Complaint, with a 21 day response/answer filing deadline pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 12 by Affordable Aerial Photography, Inc.. Str8 Real Estate Company served on 7/4/2022, response/answer due 7/25/2022. (DeSouza, Daniel) |
Filing 6 ORDER REQUIRING COMBINED RESPONSES. After all Defendants have been served, Defendants shall submit a single combined response or separate answers within the time allowed for the last-served Defendant to respond. Signed by Judge Aileen M. Cannon on 6/10/2022. See attached document for full details. (ebz) |
Filing 5 FORM AO 121 SENT TO DIRECTOR OF U.S. COPYRIGHT OFFICE (nan) |
Filing 4 Summons Issued as to Anthony L. Pizzarelli, Str8 Real Estate Company. (nan) |
Filing 3 Clerks Notice to Filer re: Electronic Case. Documents Improperly Arranged. The Filer did not properly attach the Exhibits. Future filings must comply with the CM/ECF Civil Case Opening Guide. It is not necessary to re-file this document. (nan) |
Filing 2 Clerks Notice of Judge Assignment to Judge Aileen M. Cannon. Pursuant to 28 USC 636(c), the parties are hereby notified that the U.S. Magistrate Judge Bruce E. Reinhart is available to handle any or all proceedings in this case. If agreed, parties should complete and file the Consent form found on our website. It is not necessary to file a document indicating lack of consent. (nan) |
Filing 1 COMPLAINT against All Defendants. Filing fees $ 402.00 receipt number AFLSDC-15704504, filed by Affordable Aerial Photography, Inc.. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Summons, #3 Summons)(DeSouza, Daniel) (Additional attachment(s) added on 6/9/2022: #4 Exhibits A-B) (nan). Modified Attachment Descriptions on 6/9/2022 (nan). |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Florida Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.