Levine v. Costco Wholesale Corp
JOEL V LEVINE |
COSTCO WHOLESALE CORP and Costco Wholesale Corp. |
9:2022cv80896 |
June 17, 2022 |
US District Court for the Southern District of Florida |
William Matthewman |
Donald M Middlebrooks |
P.I.: Other |
28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 Diversity-Notice of Removal |
Both |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on August 2, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 15 NOTICE of Mediator Selection. Selected/Added JOEL V LEVINE, Gary S. Dickstein as Mediator. (Lasnier de Lavalette, Marc) |
Filing 14 Joint SCHEDULING REPORT - Rule 26(f) by Costco Wholesale Corp. (Bedard, Benjamin) |
![]() |
![]() |
Filing 11 PAPERLESS Minute Entryfor proceedings held before Magistrate Judge William Matthewman: The hearing was held via Zoom Video Teleconference. Scheduling Conference held on 07/19/2022. The Court discussed whether parties would be added, the trial period, pretrial deadlines, motions to continue, sealing of documents, consent to magistrate judge jurisdiction, mediation or settlement conferences, requirements if a settlement is reached, discovery and good faith conferral. The Court discussed the Defendant's Motion to Modify the Trial Date. The Court will grant in part and deny in part the motion. Plaintiff's counsel discussed filing a motion to expedite the trial date. Written scheduling order and order of referral to mediation will be issued. Total time in court: 27 minutes. Attorney Appearance(s): Marc Philippe Lasnier de Lavalette, John George. (Digital 10:00:51) (kza) |
Filing 9 Unopposed MOTION to Continue to Modify Trial Date by COSTCO WHOLESALE CORP. Responses due by 7/29/2022 (Bedard, Benjamin) |
![]() |
Filing 8 Clerk's Notice to Filer re #6 Notice of Attorney Appearance. Two or More Document Events Filed as One; ERROR - Only one event was selected by the Filer but more than one event was applicable to the document filed. The docket entry was corrected by the Clerk. It is not necessary to refile this document but in the future, the Filer must select all applicable events. (scn) |
Filing 7 MOTION to Withdraw as Attorney by Karl Labertew for / by JOEL V LEVINE. Responses due by 7/27/2022. (scn) |
Filing 6 NOTICE of Attorney Appearance by Marc Philippe Lasnier de Lavalette on behalf of JOEL V LEVINE. Attorney Marc Philippe Lasnier de Lavalette added to party JOEL V LEVINE(pty:pla). (Lasnier de Lavalette, Marc) |
![]() |
![]() |
Filing 3 Clerks Notice to Filer re: Electronic Case. Incorrect Party Role Selected. The Filer failed to select the correct party role. The correction was made. It is not necessary to re-file this document. (mab) |
Filing 2 Clerks Notice of Judge Assignment to Judge Donald M. Middlebrooks. Pursuant to 28 USC 636(c), the parties are hereby notified that the U.S. Magistrate Judge William Matthewman is available to handle any or all proceedings in this case. If agreed, parties should complete and file the Consent form found on our website. It is not necessary to file a document indicating lack of consent. (mab) Modified on 6/21/2022 (mab). |
Filing 1 NOTICE OF REMOVAL (STATE COURT COMPLAINT - COMPLAINT) Filing fee $ 402.00 receipt number AFLSDC-15726814, filed by COSTCO WHOLESALE CORP. Answer Filed/ No Motion to Dismiss Filed in State Court.(Attachments: #1 State Court Complaint, #2 Exhibit 2, #3 Exhibit 3, #4 Exhibit 4, #5 Civil Cover Sheet)(Bedard, Benjamin) Modified attachment description on 6/21/2022 (mab). |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Florida Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.