Couto v. Kelley et al
| Jahira M Couto |
| James M Kelley, William Bradley, Department of Justice and Federal Bureau of Investigation |
| 9:2022cv80905 |
| June 21, 2022 |
| US District Court for the Southern District of Florida |
| Donald M Middlebrooks |
| Motor Vehicle |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 2671 Federal Tort Claims Act |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on June 21, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 3 Summons Issued as to William Bradley, Department of Justice, Federal Bureau of Investigation, and James M Kelley. (mab) |
| Filing 2 Clerks Notice of Judge Assignment to Judge Donald M. Middlebrooks. Pursuant to 28 USC 636(c), the parties are hereby notified that the U.S. Magistrate Judge William Matthewman is available to handle any or all proceedings in this case. If agreed, parties should complete and file the Consent form found on our website. It is not necessary to file a document indicating lack of consent. (mab) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against All Defendants. Filing fees $ 402.00 receipt number AFLSDC-15729673, filed by Jahira M Couto. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit SB 95 Form, #2 Docket Sheet Civil Cover Sheet, #3 Summon(s) Summons for Defendant Bradley, #4 Summon(s) Summons for Defendant DOJ, #5 Summon(s) Summons for Defendant FBI, #6 Summon(s) Summons for Defendant Kelley)(Karr, Lowell) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Florida Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
