McGilvra v. BOEHRINGER INGELHEIM PHARMACEUTCALS, INC. et al
| Ruby McGilvra |
| BOEHRINGER INGELHEIM PHARMACEUTCALS, INC., Boehringer Ingelheim Corporation, Boehringer Ingelheim USA Corporation, CHATTEM, INC., DSM Pharmaceuticals Inc., GlaxoSmithKline, LLC, GlaxoSmithKline (America) Inc., GlaxoSmithkline, PLC, Sanofi-Aventis U. S. LLC, Sanofi US Services Inc. and Patheon Manufacturing Serivces, LLC |
| 9:2022cv81135 |
| July 29, 2022 |
| US District Court for the Southern District of Florida |
| Personal Injury: Health Care/Pharmaceutical Personal Injury Product Liability |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on August 24, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 3 Clerk's Notice of Filing Fee refunded to Jeffrey Ostrow in the amount of $402.00 on 08/24/2022 re 2 Clerk's Notice to Filer re: Electronic Case, (Zacarias, Hozac) |
| Filing 2 Clerk's Notice to Filer re: Electronic Case. Case Administratively Closed - Case Opened in Error. Amended Complaint (re 9:20-CV-82120-RLR), THIS IS NOT A NEW CASE. Filing fees will be refunded. Amount $402.00, receipt #AFLSDC-15829675, case filed date: 07/29/2022. No further entries will be made on this case. (jc) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT Amended Short-Form Complaint against All Defendants. Filing fees $ 402.00 receipt number AFLSDC-15829675, filed by Ruby McGilvra. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet)(Tropin, Daniel) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Florida Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
