BERMAN v. RESERVEBAR EXPRESS CORP.
| BARRY BERMAN |
| RESERVEBAR EXPRESS CORP. d/b/a MINIBAR DELIVERY |
| 9:2022cv81282 |
| August 18, 2022 |
| US District Court for the Southern District of Florida |
| Raag Singhal |
| Other Statutory Actions |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1441 Notice of Removal |
| Both |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on September 30, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 14 CLERK'S NOTICE of Compliance mailed copies by certified mail, return receipt requested, to the Office of the Attorney General, State of Florida re #11 Defendant's MOTION to Dismiss with Prejudice #1 Notice of Removal (State Court Complaint), filed by RESERVEBAR EXPRESS CORP., #12 Notice (Other) filed by RESERVEBAR EXPRESS CORP., #13 Order. (ebz) |
| Filing 13 CERTIFICATION OF CONSTITUTIONAL CHALLENGE. The State of Florida shall, on or before October 31, 2022, notify the Court by appropriate filing of whether it intends to intervene. Signed by Judge Raag Singhal on 9/27/2022. See attached document for full details. (ebz) |
| Filing 12 NOTICE by RESERVEBAR EXPRESS CORP. of Constitutional Challenge (Hayden, Donald) |
| Filing 11 Defendant's MOTION to Dismiss with Prejudice #1 Notice of Removal (State Court Complaint), by RESERVEBAR EXPRESS CORP.. Attorney Donald John Hayden added to party RESERVEBAR EXPRESS CORP.(pty:dft). Responses due by 10/11/2022 (Hayden, Donald) |
| SYSTEM ENTRY - Docket Entry 10 [order] restricted/sealed until further notice. (ch1) |
| Filing 9 Defendant's Certificate of Other Affiliates/Corporate Disclosure Statement by RESERVEBAR EXPRESS CORP. (Adar, Yaniv) |
| Set/Reset Response/Answer Due Deadline: RESERVEBAR EXPRESS CORP. response/answer due 9/26/2022. Per DE 8 Order. (ebz) |
| Set/Reset Response/Answer Due Deadline: RESERVEBAR EXPRESS CORP. response/answer due 9/1/2022. Per DE 7 Order. (ebz) |
Filing 8
CORRECTED PAPERLESS ORDER granting #6 Unopposed Motion for Extension of Time to Respond to Complaint. Defendant shall file a Response/Answer to the Complaint on or before 9/26/2022. Signed by Judge Raag Singhal on 8/18/2022. (pb00)
|
|
Filing 7
PAPERLESS ORDER granting #6 Unopposed Motion for Extension of Time to Respond to Complaint. Defendant's Response/Answer shall be filed on or before 9/1/2022. Signed by Judge Raag Singhal on 8/18/2022. (pb00)
|
| Filing 6 Unopposed MOTION for Extension of Time TO RESPOND TO COMPLAINT by RESERVEBAR EXPRESS CORP.. Responses due by 9/1/2022 (Attachments: #1 Text of Proposed Order)(Adar, Yaniv) Brought back per chambers on 8/18/2022 (mf). |
|
Filing 5
Order Requiring Joint Scheduling Report. Joint Scheduling Report due by 9/8/2022. Signed by Judge Raag Singhal on 8/18/2022. See attached document for full details. (ar2)
|
|
Filing 4
PAPERLESS ORDER TO FILE CERTIFICATE OF INTERESTED PERSONSWithin SEVEN (7) DAYS of entry of an appearance, each party, including governmental parties, must file certificates of interested parties and corporate disclosure statements that contain a complete list of persons, associated persons, firms, partnerships, or corporations that have a financial interest in the outcome of this case, including subsidiaries, conglomerates, affiliates, parent corporations, and other identifiable legal entities related to a party. The parties shall not include Judge Singhal or the paired magistrate judges as interested parties unless they have an interest in the litigation. Throughout the pendency of the action, the parties are under a continuing obligation to amend, correct, and update the certificates. Signed by Judge Raag Singhal on 8/18/2022. (pb00)
|
| Filing 3 NOTICE OF COURT PRACTICEUnless otherwise specified by the Court, every motion, legal memorandum, brief, and otherwise shall: be double-spaced, in justified alignment, in 12-point font, using either Times New Roman or Arial typeface. This Notice does not supplant the requirements and provisions of Local Rule 7.1(c). The Court cautions parties against excessive use of footnotes.Multiple Plaintiffs or Defendants shall file joint motions with co-parties unless there are clear conflicts of position. If conflicts of position exist, parties shall explain the conflicts in their separate motions.Parties are encouraged to seek extensions of time in a timely fashion. "A motion for extension of time is not self-executing; no motion is, unless expressly provided for by the applicable rule. Yet, by filing these motions on or near the last day, and then sitting idle pending the Court's disposition of the motion, parties essentially grant their own motion. The Court will not condone this." Compere v. Nusret Miami, LLC, 2020 WL 2844888, at *2 (S.D. Fla. May 7, 2020) (internal citations omitted).Exhibits to pleadings and motions shall be docketed in accordance with the Courts CM/ECF procedures, Rule 3L.(2): (2) Describing an Attachment to a Docket EntryA party filing an attachment to a document shall select one of the prescribed attachment categories from the drop-down menu (e.g., affidavit, transcript), provide an alphabetical or numerical designation (e.g., Exhibit A, Exhibit 1), and descriptively name each attachment (e.g., Exhibit 1 - Affidavit of Boo Radley) in a manner that enables the Court to easily locate and distinguish attachments. (Emphasis added.) Local Rule 16.4, Local Rules for the United States District Court for the Southern District of Florida, requires that a Notice of Settlement "shall be filed and served jointly by counsel for all parties to the settlement." A unilateral notice of settlement will not stay pre-trial deadlines or hearings.Failure to comply with any of these procedures may result in the imposition of appropriate sanctions. Signed by Judge Raag Singhal on 8/18/2022. (pb00) |
| Filing 2 Clerks Notice of Judge Assignment to Judge Raag Singhal. Pursuant to 28 USC 636(c), the parties are hereby notified that the U.S. Magistrate Judge Ryon M. McCabe is available to handle any or all proceedings in this case. If agreed, parties should complete and file the Consent form found on our website. It is not necessary to file a document indicating lack of consent. (pc) |
| Filing 1 NOTICE OF REMOVAL (STATE COURT COMPLAINT - Class Action Complaint) Filing fee $ 402.00 receipt number AFLSDC-15879969, filed by RESERVEBAR EXPRESS CORP. d/b/a MINIBAR DELIVERY. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Exhibit A, #3 Exhibit B, #4 Exhibit C, #5 Exhibit D) (Adar, Yaniv) (No Answer/Motion to Dismiss filed) Modified text on 8/18/2022 (pc). |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Florida Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: BERMAN v. RESERVEBAR EXPRESS CORP. | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff: BARRY BERMAN | |
| Represented By: | Jeremy Phillip Dover |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant: RESERVEBAR EXPRESS CORP. d/b/a MINIBAR DELIVERY | |
| Represented By: | Joshua Adam Migdal |
| Represented By: | Yaniv Adar |
| Represented By: | Donald John Hayden |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
