Muccio v. USHealth Advisors, LLC
| Stephen Muccio |
| USHealth Advisors, LLC |
| 9:2022cv81436 |
| September 14, 2022 |
| US District Court for the Southern District of Florida |
| Donald M Middlebrooks |
| Personal Property: Other |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 Diversity-Notice of Removal |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on November 10, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 14 MOTION for Bill of Costs by USHealth Advisors, LLC. Responses due by 11/28/2022 (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A)(Taub, Roy) |
| Filing 13 MOTION for Leave to File Sur-Reply by Stephen Muccio. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A - Proposed Sur-Reply, #2 Text of Proposed Order)(Hiraldo, Manuel) |
| Filing 12 REPLY to Response to Motion re #10 MOTION for Attorney Fees (Award of Entitlement to Attorneys' Fees & Costs) filed by USHealth Advisors, LLC. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A)(Taub, Roy) |
| Filing 11 RESPONSE in Opposition re #10 MOTION for Attorney Fees (Award of Entitlement to Attorneys' Fees & Costs) filed by Stephen Muccio. Replies due by 11/4/2022. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A - Order Denying Motion for Fees, #2 Exhibit B - Abbott v. Advantage Travel, LLC, #3 Exhibit C - Proposed Bill Amendment)(Hiraldo, Manuel) |
| Filing 10 MOTION for Attorney Fees (Award of Entitlement to Attorneys' Fees & Costs) by USHealth Advisors, LLC. Responses due by 11/8/2022 (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A, #2 Exhibit B, #3 Exhibit C, #4 Exhibit D, #5 Exhibit E, #6 Exhibit F, #7 Exhibit G, #8 Exhibit H)(Taub, Roy) |
Filing 9
ORDER CLOSING CASE: The Clerk of Court shall CLOSE THIS CASE. All pending motions are DENIED AS MOOT. Closing Case. (Without Prejudice) Signed by Judge Donald M. Middlebrooks on 10/12/2022. See attached document for full details. (scn)
|
| Filing 8 NOTICE of Voluntary Dismissal Without Prejudice by Stephen Muccio. Attorney Jennifer Gomes Simil added to party Stephen Muccio(pty:pla). (Simil, Jennifer) |
| Filing 7 NOTICE by USHealth Advisors, LLC re #6 MOTION to Dismiss the State Court Complaint contained within the Notice of Removal with Prejudice #1 Notice of Removal (State Court Complaint), Notice of Constitutional Question (Backman, Jeffrey) |
| Filing 6 MOTION to Dismiss the State Court Complaint contained within the Notice of Removal with Prejudice #1 Notice of Removal (State Court Complaint), by USHealth Advisors, LLC. Responses due by 10/12/2022 (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A, #2 Exhibit B, #3 Exhibit C)(Backman, Jeffrey) |
|
Filing 5
PAPERLESS ORDER granting #3 Unopposed Motion for Extension of Time. Defendant seeks a 7-day extension of time to respond to Plaintiff's Complaint (DE #1 ), citing as grounds the press of other matters as reason to extend. Good cause having been shown, the motion is granted. Defendant shall respond to the Complaint no later than September 28, 2022. No other litigation deadlines are modified or extended as a result of this Order. Signed by Judge Donald M. Middlebrooks on 9/20/2022. (kal)
|
| Filing 4 Certificate of Other Affiliates/Corporate Disclosure Statement by USHealth Advisors, LLC identifying Corporate Parent USHealth Group, Inc., Corporate Parent Unitedhealth Group Incorporated for USHealth Advisors, LLC (Taub, Roy) |
| Filing 3 Unopposed MOTION for Extension of Time to File Response/Reply/Answer as to #1 Notice of Removal (State Court Complaint), by USHealth Advisors, LLC. (Attachments: #1 Text of Proposed Order)(Taub, Roy) |
| Filing 2 Clerks Notice of Judge Assignment to Judge Donald M. Middlebrooks. Pursuant to 28 USC 636(c), the parties are hereby notified that the U.S. Magistrate Judge William Matthewman is available to handle any or all proceedings in this case. If agreed, parties should complete and file the Consent form found on our website. It is not necessary to file a document indicating lack of consent. Pro se (NON-PRISONER) litigants may receive Notices of Electronic Filings (NEFS) via email after filing a Consent by Pro Se Litigant (NON-PRISONER) to Receive Notices of Electronic Filing. The consent form is available under the forms section of our website. (scn) |
| Filing 1 NOTICE OF REMOVAL (STATE COURT COMPLAINT - Class Action Complaint) Filing fee $ 402.00 receipt number AFLSDC-15948993, filed by USHealth Advisors, LLC. (No Answer filed/No Motion to Dismiss filed) (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A, #2 Exhibit B, #3 Exhibit C, #4 Affidavit, #5 Civil Cover Sheet)(Taub, Roy) Text Modified on 9/14/2022 (scn). |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Florida Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: Muccio v. USHealth Advisors, LLC | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff: Stephen Muccio | |
| Represented By: | Manuel Santiago Hiraldo |
| Represented By: | Jennifer Gomes Simil |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant: USHealth Advisors, LLC | |
| Represented By: | Jeffrey Aaron Backman |
| Represented By: | Roy Taub |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
