Katz et al v. Monsanto Company
Plaintiff: David Katz and Marjorie Katz
Defendant: Monsanto Company
Case Number: 9:2022cv81455
Filed: September 20, 2022
Court: US District Court for the Southern District of Florida
Presiding Judge: Donald M Middlebrooks
Nature of Suit: Personal Inj. Prod. Liability
Cause of Action: 28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Jury Demanded By: Plaintiff
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on October 6, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
October 6, 2022 Filing 9 ACKNOWLEDGMENT OF RECEIPT. Case transferred from Florida Southern has been opened in California Northern District as case 3:22-cv-05732, filed 10/05/2022. (bb)
October 5, 2022 Filing 8 ACKNOWLEDGMENT OF RECEIPT. Case transferred from Florida Southern has been opened in California Northern District as case 3:22-cv-05759, filed 10/05/2022. (bb)
October 4, 2022 Filing 7 CONDITIONAL TRANSFER ORDER (CTO-355) transferring case to the Northern District of California re: MDL 2741 for consolidated pretrial proceedings pursuant to 28 USC 1407 and assigned to the Honorable Vince Chhabria. (Signed by John W. Nichols, Clerk of the Panel). (pes)
October 4, 2022 Civil Case Terminated Re: DE #7 . Closing Case. (pes)
October 4, 2022 SYSTEM ENTRY - Case 9:22-cv-81455 electronically transferred out to California Northern. (pes)
September 21, 2022 Filing 6 WAIVER OF SERVICE Returned Executed by David Katz, Marjorie Katz. Monsanto Company waiver sent on 9/21/2022, response/answer due 11/21/2022. (Roslansky, Eric)
September 21, 2022 Filing 5 Initial Disclosure(s) of Interested Persons and Corporate Disclosure Statement by David Katz, Marjorie Katz (Roslansky, Eric)
September 21, 2022 Filing 4 Notice of Pending, Refiled, Related or Similar Actions by David Katz, Marjorie Katz (Roslansky, Eric)
September 20, 2022 Filing 3 Summons Issued as to Monsanto Company. (mab)
September 20, 2022 Filing 2 Clerks Notice of Judge Assignment to Judge Donald M. Middlebrooks. Pursuant to 28 USC 636(c), the parties are hereby notified that the U.S. Magistrate Judge William Matthewman is available to handle any or all proceedings in this case. If agreed, parties should complete and file the Consent form found on our website. It is not necessary to file a document indicating lack of consent. (mab)
September 20, 2022 Filing 1 COMPLAINT against Monsanto Company. Filing fees $ 402.00 receipt number AFLSDC-15962381, filed by David Katz, Marjorie Katz. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Summon(s))(Roslansky, Eric)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Florida Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Katz et al v. Monsanto Company
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: David Katz
Represented By: Eric Daniel Roslansky
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Marjorie Katz
Represented By: Eric Daniel Roslansky
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Monsanto Company
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?