Betancourt v. NOEL MARIE, INC.
| Rudolph Betancourt |
| NOEL MARIE, INC. doing business as YAMATO U-GAS |
| 9:2022cv81625 |
| October 21, 2022 |
| US District Court for the Southern District of Florida |
| Donald M Middlebrooks |
| Civil Rights: Americans with Disabilities - Other |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 12182 Americans with Disabilities Act |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on December 14, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 11 SUMMONS (Affidavit) Returned Executed on #8 Amended Complaint/Amended Notice of Removal with a 21 day response/answer filing deadline pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 12 by Rudolph Betancourt. NOEL MARIE, INC. served on 12/13/2022, response/answer due 1/3/2023. (Goldstein, Glenn) |
| Filing 10 Summons Issued as to NOEL MARIE, INC.. (pcs) |
| Filing 9 NOTICE of Filing Proposed Summons(es) by Rudolph Betancourt re #8 Amended Complaint/Amended Notice of Removal filed by Rudolph Betancourt (Goldstein, Glenn) |
| Filing 8 First AMENDED COMPLAINT against NOEL MARIE, INC., filed by Rudolph Betancourt.(Goldstein, Glenn) |
| Filing 7 Summons (Affidavit) Returned Unexecuted by Rudolph Betancourt as to NOEL MARIE, INC.. (Goldstein, Glenn) |
| Filing 6 NOTICE by Rudolph Betancourt re #4 Scheduling Order NOTICE OF FILING AND SERVICE OF PLAINTIFF'S WRITTEN REPORT OF VIOLATIONS IN COMPLIANCE WITH DE#4 (Goldstein, Glenn) |
| Filing 5 NOTICE by Rudolph Betancourt re #4 Scheduling Order Plaintiff's Notice of Filing Answers to Court's Interrogatories - ADA Title III (Goldstein, Glenn) |
Filing 4
ADA TITLE III SCHEDULING ORDER: Mediation Deadline 1/20/2023. Status Report due by 1/27/2023. Signed by Judge Donald M. Middlebrooks on 10/25/2022. See attached document for full details. (jas)
|
| Filing 3 Summons Issued as to NOEL MARIE, INC. (mab) |
| Filing 2 Clerks Notice of Judge Assignment to Judge Donald M. Middlebrooks. Pursuant to 28 USC 636(c), the parties are hereby notified that the U.S. Magistrate Judge William Matthewman is available to handle any or all proceedings in this case. If agreed, parties should complete and file the Consent form found on our website. It is not necessary to file a document indicating lack of consent. (mab) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against NOEL MARIE, INC.. Filing fees $ 402.00 receipt number AFLSDC-16044694, filed by Rudolph Betancourt. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Summon(s))(Goldstein, Glenn) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Florida Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: Betancourt v. NOEL MARIE, INC. | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff: Rudolph Betancourt | |
| Represented By: | Glenn R Goldstein |
| Represented By: | Lauren Nicole Wassenberg |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant: NOEL MARIE, INC. doing business as YAMATO U-GAS | |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
