Conder v. Sunbeam Products, Inc.
| Desiree Ann Conder |
| Sunbeam Products, Inc. |
| 9:2022cv81722 |
| November 3, 2022 |
| US District Court for the Southern District of Florida |
| Aileen M Cannon |
| Personal Inj. Prod. Liability |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 Diversity-Product Liability |
| Defendant |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on December 20, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 9
ORDER REQUIRING JOINT SCHEDULING REPORTAND CERTIFICATES OF INTERESTED PARTIES: Joint Scheduling Report due by 1/10/2023 Signed by Judge Aileen M. Cannon on 12/20/2022. See attached document for full details. (nan)
|
| Filing 8 Defendant's Certificate of Other Affiliates/Corporate Disclosure Statement by Sunbeam Products, Inc. identifying Corporate Parent Newell Brands, Inc., Corporate Parent BlackRock, Inc. (BLK), Corporate Parent Icahn Enterprises, L.P. for Sunbeam Products, Inc. (Janis, Rodney) |
| Filing 7 Defendant, Sunbeam's ANSWER and Affirmative Defenses to Amended Complaint with Jury Demand by Sunbeam Products, Inc.. Attorney Rodney Janis added to party Sunbeam Products, Inc.(pty:dft). (Janis, Rodney) |
| Filing 6 Summons Issued as to Sunbeam Products, Inc. (pes) |
| Filing 5 First AMENDED COMPLAINT against Sunbeam Products, Inc., filed by Desiree Ann Conder. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A, #2 Exhibit B, #3 Summon(s))(Gorshe, Lisa) |
|
Filing 4
ORDER DISMISSING COMPLAINT. The Complaint DE #1 is DISMISSED WITHOUT PREJUDICE. Plaintiff may file an amended pleading that is consistent with this Order on or before November 30, 2022. (Amended Complaint due by 11/30/2022.) Signed by Judge Aileen M. Cannon on 11/10/2022. See attached document for full details. (ebz)
|
| Filing 3 Summons Issued as to Sunbeam Products, Inc. (rbe) |
| Filing 2 Clerks Notice of Judge Assignment to Judge Aileen M. Cannon. Pursuant to 28 USC 636(c), the parties are hereby notified that the U.S. Magistrate Judge Bruce E. Reinhart is available to handle any or all proceedings in this case. If agreed, parties should complete and file the Consent form found on our website. It is not necessary to file a document indicating lack of consent. (rbe) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against Sunbeam Products, Inc.. Filing fees $ 402.00 receipt number AFLSDC-16075556, filed by Desiree Ann Conder. (Attachments: #1 Summon(s) Summons, #2 Civil Cover Sheet Civil Cover Sheet, #3 Exhibit A - Owner's Manual, #4 Exhibit B - Recall Notice)(Gorshe, Lisa) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Florida Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: Conder v. Sunbeam Products, Inc. | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff: Desiree Ann Conder | |
| Represented By: | Lisa Ann Gorshe |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant: Sunbeam Products, Inc. | |
| Represented By: | Rodney Janis |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
