XLMedica, Inc. et al v. Accelerated Biologics, LLC
| XLMedica, Inc. and Anna Stahl |
| Accelerated Biologics, LLC |
| 9:2022mc80874 |
| June 13, 2022 |
| US District Court for the Southern District of Florida |
| Rodney Smith |
| Trademark |
| 15 U.S.C. ยง 1125 Trademark Infringement (Lanham Act) |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on June 13, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 3 Clerks Notice to Filer re: Summons cannot be issued. MC type cases do not require summons. (mab) |
| Filing 2 Judge Assignment to Judge Rodney Smith (mab) |
| Filing 1 Petition/Motion (Complaint) RE: Subpoena to Enforce from Another District . Filing fee $49.00 receipt number AFLSDC-15712100, filed by XLMedica, Inc., Anna Stahl. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Summon(s), #3 Exhibit A. Defendants Second Amended Affirmative Defenses and Second Amended Counterclaim, #4 Exhibit B. EmCyte Corp.'s Second Amended Complaint, #5 Exhibit C. Subpoena to Produce Documents Directed to Accelerated Biologics, LLC, #6 Exhibit D. Return of Service as to Subpoena to Produce Documents Directed to Accelerated Biologics, LLC, #7 Exhibit E. Email Communications with Counsel for Accelerated Biologics dated Jan. 31, 2022, #8 Exhibit F. Email Communications with Counsel for Accelerated Biologics dated Jan. 31, 2022 through April 15, 2022)(Flanagan, Patricia) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Florida Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
