O.E. Wheel Distributors, LLC v. Mobile Hi-Tech Wheels, LLC et al
Plaintiff: O.E. Wheel Distributors, LLC
Defendant: Mobile Hi-Tech Wheels, LLC and Wheel Pros, LLC
Case Number: 9:2022mc80937
Filed: June 27, 2022
Court: US District Court for the Southern District of Florida
Presiding Judge: Raag Singhal
Nature of Suit: Patent
Jury Demanded By: None
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on July 6, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
July 6, 2022 Filing 12 ACKNOWLEDGMENT OF RECEIPT. Case transferred from Florida Southern has been opened in Middle District of Florida as case 8:22-mc-00024, filed 07/05/2022. (bb)
July 4, 2022 SYSTEM ENTRY - Case 9:22-mc-80937 electronically transferred out to Florida Middle. (mee)
July 1, 2022 Civil Case Terminated. Closing Case. Per d.e. #11 Order. (mee)
July 1, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 11 ORDER OF TRANSFER, granting #10 Motion Consent MOTION EXPEDITED MOTION TO TRANSFER NON-PARTY JORDAN MAX SWERDLOFFS MOTION TO QUASH. Signed by Judge Raag Singhal on 6/30/2022. See attached document for full details. (mee)
June 30, 2022 Filing 10 Consent MOTION EXPEDITED MOTION TO TRANSFER NON-PARTY JORDAN MAX SWERDLOFFS MOTION TO QUASH re #1 Petition/Motion (Complaint) RE: Subpoena from Another District, by Mobile Hi-Tech Wheels, LLC, Wheel Pros, LLC. Attorney Cameron Scott Frye added to party Mobile Hi-Tech Wheels, LLC(pty:dft), Attorney Cameron Scott Frye added to party Wheel Pros, LLC(pty:dft). (Attachments: #1 Exhibit Declaration of Neil Greenstein)(Frye, Cameron)
June 29, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 9 VACATED-ORDER OF REFERRAL. This matter is REFERRED to Magistrate Judge Ryon M. McCabe for disposition of all non-dispositive motions and report and recommendation on dispositive motions re #1 Petition/Motion (Complaint) RE: Subpoena from Another District, filed by Jordan Max Swerdloff Signed by Judge Raag Singhal on 6/29/2022. See attached document for full details. (mee) Modified on 7/1/2022 (mee).Per d.e. #11 Order.
June 29, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 8 PAPERLESS ORDER TO FILE CERTIFICATE OF INTERESTED PERSONSWithin SEVEN (7) DAYS of entry of an appearance, each party, including governmental parties, must file certificates of interested parties and corporate disclosure statements that contain a complete list of persons, associated persons, firms, partnerships, or corporations that have a financial interest in the outcome of this case, including subsidiaries, conglomerates, affiliates, parent corporations, and other identifiable legal entities related to a party. The parties shall not include Judge Singhal or the paired magistrate judges as interested parties unless they have an interest in the litigation. Throughout the pendency of the action, the parties are under a continuing obligation to amend, correct, and update the certificates. Signed by Judge Raag Singhal on 6/29/2022. (pls)
June 29, 2022 Filing 7 NOTICE OF COURT PRACTICEUnless otherwise specified by the Court, every motion, legal memorandum, brief, and otherwise shall: be double-spaced, in justified alignment, in 12-point font, using either Times New Roman or Arial typeface. This Notice does not supplant the requirements and provisions of Local Rule 7.1(c). The Court cautions parties against excessive use of footnotes.Multiple Plaintiffs or Defendants shall file joint motions with co-parties unless there are clear conflicts of position. If conflicts of position exist, parties shall explain the conflicts in their separate motions.Parties are encouraged to seek extensions of time in a timely fashion. "A motion for extension of time is not self-executing; no motion is, unless expressly provided for by the applicable rule. Yet, by filing these motions on or near the last day, and then sitting idle pending the Court's disposition of the motion, parties essentially grant their own motion. The Court will not condone this." Compere v. Nusret Miami, LLC, 2020 WL 2844888, at *2 (S.D. Fla. May 7, 2020) (internal citations omitted).Exhibits to pleadings and motions shall be docketed in accordance with the Courts CM/ECF procedures, Rule 3L.(2): (2) Describing an Attachment to a Docket EntryA party filing an attachment to a document shall select one of the prescribed attachment categories from the drop-down menu (e.g., affidavit, transcript), provide an alphabetical or numerical designation (e.g., Exhibit A, Exhibit 1), and descriptively name each attachment (e.g., Exhibit 1 - Affidavit of Boo Radley) in a manner that enables the Court to easily locate and distinguish attachments. (Emphasis added.) Local Rule 16.4, Local Rules for the United States District Court for the Southern District of Florida, requires that a Notice of Settlement "shall be filed and served jointly by counsel for all parties to the settlement." A unilateral notice of settlement will not stay pre-trial deadlines or hearings.Failure to comply with any of these procedures may result in the imposition of appropriate sanctions. Signed by Judge Raag Singhal on 6/29/2022. (pls)
June 28, 2022 Filing 6 NOTICE by Jordan Max Swerdloff re 4 Clerk's Notice to Filer re: Electronic Case (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet Civil Cover Sheet) (Richter, Mindi)
June 28, 2022 Filing 5 Bar Letter re: Admissions sent to attorney Samuel Alexander Long, Jr. and Tom BenGera, mailing date June 28, 2022, (pt)
June 28, 2022 Filing 4 Clerk's Notice to Filer re: Electronic Case. No Civil Cover Sheet. Filer is instructed to file a Notice (Other) with the Civil Cover Sheet attached within 24 hours of the notice. (swr)
June 28, 2022 Filing 3 Clerk's Notice to Filer re: Electronic Case. Incorrect case opening information. The Filer selected the incorrect Case Type when filing. The correction was made. It is not necessary to re-file this document. (swr)
June 27, 2022 Filing 2 Clerks Notice of Judge Assignment to Judge Raag Singhal. (swr)
June 27, 2022 Filing 1 Petition/Motion (Complaint) RE: Subpoena to Quash from Another District and Alternative Motion for Protective Order and Memorandum of Law in Support. Filing fee $49.00 receipt number AFLSDC-15746790, filed by Jordan Max Swerdloff. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit 1, #2 Exhibit 2)(Richter, Mindi)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Florida Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: O.E. Wheel Distributors, LLC v. Mobile Hi-Tech Wheels, LLC et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: O.E. Wheel Distributors, LLC
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Mobile Hi-Tech Wheels, LLC
Represented By: Cameron Scott Frye
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Wheel Pros, LLC
Represented By: Cameron Scott Frye
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?